Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 43, 2024 - Issue 3
570
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Unique… like everyone else: effects and mechanisms of personalization appeals in recruitment advertising

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 491-532 | Received 23 Sep 2021, Accepted 10 Apr 2023, Published online: 19 Apr 2023

References

  • Ahn, S.J, and J.N. Bailenson. 2011. Self-endorsing versus other-endorsing in virtual environments. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2: 93–106.
  • Ahn, S.J., J. (Grace), Phua, and Y. Shan. 2017. Self-endorsing in digital advertisements: Using virtual selves to persuade physical selves. Computers in Human Behavior 71: 110–21.
  • Allred, A.T., S. King, and C. Amos. 2022. Can recognizing students by name influence student evaluations of teaching? Journal of Education for Business 97, no. 2: 69–75.
  • Baek, T.H, and M. Morimoto. 2012. Stay away from me: Examining the determinants of consumer avoidance of personalized. Advertising. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 1: 59–76.
  • Bang, H., D. Choi, B.W. Wojdynski, and Y.-I. Lee. 2019. How the level of personalization affects the effectiveness of personalized ad messages: The moderating role of narcissism. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 8: 1116–38.
  • Bang, H., and B.W. Wojdynski. 2016. Tracking users’ visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand. Computers in Human Behavior 55: 867–76.
  • Bartsch, A., and A. Kloß. 2019. Personalized charity advertising. Can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 3: 345–63.
  • Bechwati, N.N, and M. Morrin. 2003. Outraged consumers: Getting even at the expense of getting a good deal. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, no. 4: 440–53.
  • Berscheid, E., and E. Walster. 1974. A little bit about love, in Huston, T.L. (Ed.) Foundations of interpersonal attraction. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 355–381.
  • Bleier, A., and M. Eisenbeiss. 2015. The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing 91, no. 3: 390–409.
  • Boerman, S.C, and S. Kruikemeier. 2016. Consumer responses to promoted tweets sent by brands and political parties. Computers in Human Behavior 65: 285–94.
  • Boerman, S.C., S. Kruikemeier, and F.J. Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2017. Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 3: 363–76.
  • Brehm, J.W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
  • Brewer, M.B. 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, no. 5: 475–82.
  • Brinson, N.H., M.S. Eastin, and V.J. Cicchirillo. 2018. Reactance to personalization: Understanding the drivers behind the growth of ad blocking. Journal of Interactive Advertising 18, no. 2: 136–47.
  • Buzeta, C., P. De Pelsmacker, and N. Dens. 2020. Motivations to use different social media types and their impact on consumers’ online brand-related activities (COBRAs). Journal of Interactive Marketing 52: 79–98.
  • Cable, D.M, and D.B. Turban. 2003. The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33, no. 11: 2244–66.
  • CareerBuilder 2018. Job seekers are now in the driver’s seat and expect next-gen recruiting and new hire experiences. Retrieved from https://press.careerbuilder.com/2018-10-30-Job-Seekers-Are-Now-in-the-Drivers-Seat-and-Expect-Next-Gen-Recruiting-and-New-Hire-Experiences-Survey-Finds/.
  • Chan, E., and J. Sengupta. 2013. Observing flattery: A social comparison perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 4: 740–58.
  • Chen, J.V., B.C. Su, and D.C. Yen. 2014. Location-based advertising in an emerging market: A study of mongolian mobile phone users. International Journal of Mobile Communications 12, no. 3: 291–310.
  • Childers, T.L, and M.J. Houston. 1984. Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research 11, no. 2: 643–54.
  • Cialdini, R.B. 2001. Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review 79, no. 9: 72–81.
  • Cucina, J.M., N.R. Martin, N.L. Vasilopoulos, and H.F. Thibodeuax. 2012. Self-serving bias effects on job analysis ratings. The Journal of Psychology 146, no. 5: 511–31.
  • Curtis, R.C, and K. Miller. 1986. Believing another likes or dislikes you: Behaviors making the beliefs come true. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, no. 2: 284–90.
  • Davenport, S.W., S.M. Bergman, J.Z. Bergman, and M.E. Fearrington. 2014. Twitter versus facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 212–20.
  • De Keyzer, F., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2022a. How and when personalized advertising leads to brand attitude, click, and WOM intention. Journal of Advertising 51, no. 1: 39–56.
  • De Keyzer, F., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2022b. Let’s get personal: Which elements elicit perceived personalization in social media advertising? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 55: 101183.
  • Demir, M., Ö.F. Şimşek, and A.D. Procsal. 2013. I am so happy ‘cause my best friend makes me feel unique: Friendship, personal sense of uniqueness and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies 14, no. 4: 1201–24.
  • Dijkstra, A. 2008. The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, no. 2: 765–84.
  • Dijkstra, A. 2005. Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: Evidence from smoking cessation. Health Education Research 20, no. 5: 527–39.
  • Fenigstein, A. 1984. Self-consciousness and the overperception of self as a target. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47, no. 4: 860–70.
  • Franke, N., and M. Schreier. 2008. Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters 19, no. 2: 93–107.
  • Fromkin, H.L, and C.R. Snyder. 1980. Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Gawande 2019. February 6). How to source passive candidates. Cvviz. https://cvviz.com/blog/how-to-source-passive-candidates/.
  • Geuens, M., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2017. Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 1: 83–100.
  • Gomes, D.R, and J. Neves. 2010. Employer branding constrains applicants’ job seeking behaviour? Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 26, no. 3: 223–34.
  • Guillot-Soulez, C., S. Saint-Onge, and S. Soulez. 2019. Linking employer labels in recruitment advertising, governance mode and organizational attractiveness. Recherche Et Applications En Marketing (English Edition) 34, no. 3: 5–26.
  • Ham, C. D. 2017. Exploring how consumers cope with online behavioral advertising. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 4: 632–58.
  • Hawkins, R.P., M. Kreuter, K. Resnicow, M. Fishbein, and A. Dijkstra. 2008. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Education Research 23, no. 3: 454–66.
  • Hayes, A.F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Howard, D.J., C. Gengler, and A. Jain. 1995. What’s in a name? A complimentary means of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 22, no. 2: 200–11.
  • Howard, D.J, and R.A. Kerin. 2004. The effects of personalized product recommendations on advertisement response rates: The “try this. It works!” technique. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14, no. 3: 271–9.
  • Hsu, C.W, and J.R. Fu. 2018. Enhancing the influence of pop-up advertisements on advertising effects from the perspective of personalization and placement. Proceedings of the 22nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Jayasinghe, L., and M. Ritson. 2013. Everyday advertising context: An ethnography of advertising response in the family living room. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 1: 104–21.
  • Jobvite 2021. 2021 Recruiter national report. Retrieved from https://www.jobvite.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Jobvite-RecruiterNation-Report-WEB-2.pdf.
  • Keusch, T., L.H. Bollen, and H.F. Hassink. 2012. Self-serving bias in annual report narratives: An empirical analysis of the impact of economic crises. European Accounting Review 21, no. 3: 1–26.
  • Kim, H., and J. Huh. 2017. Perceived relevance and privacy concern regarding online behavioral advertising (OBA) and their role in consumer responses. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 38, no. 1: 92–105.
  • Kim, J., and J.-E.R. Lee. 2011. The facebook paths to happiness: Effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14, no. 6: 359–64.
  • Koch, O.F, and A. Benlian. 2015. Promotional tactics for online viral marketing campaigns: How scarcity and personalization affect seed stage referrals. Journal of Interactive Marketing 32: 37–52.
  • Koslow, S., and D. W. Stewart. 2022. Message and media: The future of advertising research and practice in a digital environment. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 5: 827–49.
  • Krugman, D. M., G. T. Cameron, and C. M. White. 1995. Visual attention to programming and commercials: The use of in-home observations. Journal of Advertising 24, no. 1: 1–12.
  • Langer, E.J, and J. Roth. 1975. Heads I win, tails it’s chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32, no. 6: 951–5.
  • Li, C. 2016. When does web-based personalization really work? The distinction between actual personalization and perceived personalization. Computers in Human Behavior 54: 25–33.
  • Li, C., and J. Liu. 2017. A name alone is not enough: A reexamination of web-based personalization effect. Computers in Human Behavior 72: 132–9.
  • Liang, T.P., Y.W. Li, and E. Turban. 2009. Personalized services as empathic responses: The role of intimacy. Proceedings of the 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Hyderabad, India.
  • LinkedIn 2022. Dynamic Ads. Retrieved from https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/dynamic-ads.
  • Liu-Thompkins, Y. 2019. A decade of online advertising research: What we learned and what we need to know. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 1: 1–13.
  • Ma, J., N. Suntornpithug, and G. Karaatli. 2009. Mobile advertising: Does it work for everyone? International Journal of Mobile Marketing 4, no. 2: 28–35.
  • Malheiros, M., C. Jennett, S. Patel, S. Brostoff, and M.A. Sasse. 2012. Too close for comfort: A study of the effectiveness and acceptability of rich-media personalized advertising. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, TX.
  • Markos, E., L.I. Labrecque, and G.R. Milne. 2018. A new information lens: The self-concept and exchange context as a means to understand information sensitivity of anonymous and personal identifying information. Journal of Interactive Marketing 42: 46–62.
  • Maslach, C., J. Stapp, and R.T. Santee. 1985. Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, no. 3: 729–38.
  • Maslowska, E., B.V.D. Putte, and E.G. Smit. 2011. The effectiveness of personalized e-mail newsletters and the role of personal characteristics. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14, no. 12: 765–70.
  • Maslowska, E., E.G. Smit, and B. van den Putte. 2016. It is all in the name: A study of consumers’ responses to personalized communication. Journal of Interactive Advertising 16, no. 1: 74–85.
  • Meta 2021. Update on the jobs on Facebook product. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/help/982945655901961
  • Meta 2022a. Advertising policy on personal attributes. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/help/2557868957763449?id=434838534925385&helpref=uf_permalink.
  • Meta 2022b. Instant articles. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/formedia/tools/instant-articles.
  • Meta 2022c. Facebook ads guide. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/business/ads-guide/image.
  • Morwitz, V.G., E. Johnson, and D. Schmittlein. 1993. Does measuring intent change behavior? Journal of Consumer Research 20, no. 1: 46–61.
  • Myers, D. 1987. Social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • NIST 2023. National Institute of Standards and Technology - Glossary - PII. Retrieved from https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/PII.
  • Perez, D., and Y. Steinhart. 2014. Not so personal: The benefits of social identity ad appeals with activation in advertising. Social Influence 9, no. 3: 224–41.
  • Pfiffelmann, J., N. Dens, and S. Soulez. 2020. Personalized advertisements with integration of names and photographs: An eye-tracking experiment. Journal of Business Research 111: 196–207.
  • Pfiffelmann, J., and A. Pfeuffer. 2022. Understanding personalized recruitment ads’ effectiveness: The role of personalization type and message involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising 22, no. 3: 311–26.
  • Pfiffelmann, J., S. Soulez, and N. Dens. 2019. Personalization effects in recruitment advertising: The mediating role of considerateness. 2019 American Academy of Advertising Annual Conference, Dallas, TX.
  • Pfiffelmann, J., and S. Soulez. 2021. Persuasive effect of potential employees’ names and photographs in a recruitment advertisement. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L’Administration 38, no. 3: 303–17.
  • Pfiffelmann, J. 2020. Campagnes publicitaires de recrutement sur facebook et LinkedIn: À quel niveau de personnalisation vaut-il mieux recourir? Décisions Marketing 99: 17–36.
  • Porter, S.R, and M.E. Whitcomb. 2003. The impact of contact type on web survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly 67, no. 4: 579–88.
  • Pyszczynski, T., and J. Greenberg. 1987. Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 20: 297–340.
  • Ross, M., and F. Sicoly. 1979. Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, no. 3: 322–36.
  • Rossiter, J.R, and L. Percy. 1980. Attitude change through visual imagery in advertising. Journal of Advertising 9, no. 2: 10–6.
  • Sahni, N.S., S.C. Wheeler, and P. Chintagunta. 2018. Personalization in email marketing: The role of noninformative advertising content. Marketing Science 37, no. 2: 236–58.
  • Setyani, V., Y. Q. Zhu, A. N. Hidayanto, P. I. Sandhyaduhita, and B. Hsiao. 2019. Exploring the psychological mechanisms from personalized advertisements to urge to buy impulsively on social media. International Journal of Information Management 48: 96–107.
  • Shepperd, J., W. Malone, and K. Sweeny. 2008. Exploring causes of the self‐serving bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, no. 2: 895–908.
  • Şimşek, Ö.F, and B. Yalınçetin. 2010. I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences 49, no. 6: 576–81.
  • Smith, M. 2022. June 28). Introducing features to quickly find and connect with Facebook groups. Facebook. https://about.fb.com/news/2022/06/features-to-find-and-connect-with-facebook-groups/
  • Smutkupt, P., D. Krairit, and D.B. Khang. 2011. The impact of permission-based mobile advertising on consumer brand knowledge. International Journal of Mobile Marketing 6, no. 1: 94–108.
  • Snyder, C.R, and H.L. Fromkin. 1977. Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 86, no. 5: 518–27.
  • Soulez, S., and F. Poujol. 2020. Marketing et GRH: Un avenir commun? Décisions Marketing 99, no. 3: 5–16.
  • Statista 2022. Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of monthly active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
  • Steinmann, S., G. Mau, and H. Schramm‐Klein. 2015. Brand communication success in online consumption communities: An experimental analysis of the effects of communication style and brand pictorial representation. Psychology & Marketing 32, no. 3: 356–71.
  • Stiglbauer, B., and C. Kovacs. 2019. Need for uniqueness determines reactions to web-based personalized advertising. Psychological Reports 122, no. 1: 246–67.
  • Sung, Y., J.-A. Lee, E. Kim, and S.M. Choi. 2016. Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences 97: 260–5.
  • Thau, S., C. Tröster, K. Aquino, M. Pillutla, and D. De Cremer. 2013. Satisfying individual desires or moral standards? Preferential treatment and group members’ self-worth, affect, and behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 113, no. 1: 133–45.
  • Tsang, M.M., Ho, S. C. Liang, and T. P. 2004. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8, no. 3: 65–78.
  • Van Doorn, J., and J.C. Hoekstra. 2013. Customization of online advertising: The role of intrusiveness. Marketing Letters 24, no. 4: 339–51.
  • Veazie, P.J, and S. Cai. 2007. A connection between medication adherence, patient sense of uniqueness, and the personalization of information. Medical Hypotheses 68, no. 2: 335–42.
  • Vesanen, J. 2007. What is personalization? A conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing 41, no. 5/6: 409–18.
  • Viot, C., and L. Benraiss-Noailles. 2019. The link between benevolence and well-being in the context of human-resource marketing. Journal of Business Ethics 159, no. 3: 883–96.
  • Voorveld, H., A.M. van Noort, G. Muntinga, D.G, and Bronner, F. 2018. Engagement with social media and social media advertising: The differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 38–54.
  • Wattal, S., R. Telang, T. Mukhopadhyay, and P. Boatwright. 2012. “What’s in a “name”? impact of use of customer information in e-mail advertisements. Information Systems Research 23, no. 3-part-1: 679–97.
  • Webb, M.S., V.N. Simmons, and T.H. Brandon. 2005. Tailored interventions for motivating smoking cessation: Using placebo tailoring to examine the influence of expectancies and personalization. Health Psychology: official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 24, no. 2: 179–88.
  • Wei, Y.-C., C.-C. Chang, L.-Y. Lin, and S.-C. Liang. 2016. A fit perspective approach in linking corporate image and intention-to-apply. Journal of Business Research 69, no. 6: 2220–5.
  • White, T.B., D.L. Zahay, H. Thorbjørnsen, and S. Shavitt. 2008. Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters 19, no. 1: 39–50.
  • Winter, S., E. Maslowska, and A.L. Vos. 2021. The effects of trait-based personalization in social media advertising. Computers in Human Behavior 114: 106525. Published online 22 August 2020.
  • Wong, V.T.P, and C. Guan. 2018. Personalisation in location-based advertising: The moderating effect of brand familiarity. Proceedings of the 18th international conference on electronic business, Guilin, China.
  • Youn, S., and S. Kim. 2019. Understanding ad avoidance on facebook: Antecedents and outcomes of psychological reactance. Computers in Human Behavior 98: 232–44.
  • Yu, J., and B. Cude. 2009. ‘Hello, mrs. Sarah jones! We recommend this product!’ consumers’ perceptions about personalized advertising: Comparisons across advertisements delivered via three different types of media. International Journal of Consumer Studies 33, no. 4: 503–14.
  • Yu, S., L. Hudders, and V. Cauberghe. 2016. Luxury brands in the digital era: A cross-cultural comparison of the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of personalized advertising. Proceedings of the 2016 Asian Luxury Branding Research Conference, Singapore.
  • Zuckerman, M. 1979. Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality 47, no. 2: 245–87.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.