Scoping review of conceptions of literacy in middle school science

References

• Anthony, R. J., C. D. Tippett, and L. D. Yore. 2010. “Pacific CRYSTAL Project: Explicit Literacy Instruction Embedded in Middle School Science Classrooms.” Research in Science Education 40 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9156-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, and B. Wong. 2014. “Spheres of Influence: What Shapes Young People’s Aspirations at Age 12/13 and What are the Implications for Education Policy?” Journal of Education Policy 29 (1): 58–85. doi:10.1080/02680939.2013.790079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., and J. DeWitt. 2016. Understanding Young People’s Science Aspirations: How Students Form Ideas about ‘Becoming a Scientist’. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S. 2012. “Effects of inquiry-based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar.” The Journal of Educational Research 105 (2): 134–14. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.533717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Academy of Science. 2010. Primary Connections. Australian Academy of Science. https://www.science.org.au/education/academy-education/primary-connections.
   Google Scholar
• Ayra, D. J., and A. Maul. 2012. “The Role of the Scientific Discovery Narrative in Middle School Science Education: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (4): 1022–1032. doi:10.1037/a0028108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., H. Strømsø, and L. Salmeron. 2011. “Trust and Mistrust When Students Read Multiple Information Sources about Climate Change.” Learning and Instruction 21 (2): 180–192. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., K. Muis, and A. Reznitskaya. 2017. “Teachers’ Epistemic Cognition in the Context of Dialogic Practice: A Question of Calibration.” Educational Psychologist 52 (4): 253–269. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1341319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. L., and J. Concannon. 2016. “Student Perceptions of Vocabulary Knowledge and Learning in a Middle School Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (3): 391–408. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1143571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., H. Kang, E. Tan, T. B. O’Neill, J. Bautista-Guerra, and C. Brecklin. 2013. “Crafting a Future in Science: Tracing Middle School Girls’ Identity Work over Time and Space.” American Educational Research Journal 50 (1): 37–57. doi:10.3102/0002831212458142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R. 2010. “Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument Interventions in K–12 Science Contexts.” Review of Educational Research 80 (3): 336–371. doi:10.3102/0034654310376953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, and D. Leu. 2008. Handbook of Research on New Literacies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis, eds. 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, C., and S. Ollerhead. 2018. “But I’m Not an English Teacher!: Disciplinary Literacy in Australian Science Classrooms.” In Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, edited by K.-S. Tang and K. Danielsson, 29–43, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2006. “The Language Demands of Science Reading in Middle School.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (5): 491–520. doi:10.1080/09500690500339092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. 2012. “Language Correlates of Disciplinary Literacy.” Topics in Language Disorders 32 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e31824501de.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., B. Adams, V. T. Gresser, and C. Li. 2019. “Developing Critical Literacy in Science through an SFL-informed Pedagogical Heuristic.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 18 (1): 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feez, S., and F. Quinn. 2017. “Teaching the Distinctive Language of Science: An Integrated and Scaffolded Approach for pre-service Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65: 192–204. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P. J. 2007. “Interest in Science: Lessons and non-lessons from TIMSS and PISA.” In Contributions from Science Education Research, edited by R. Pintó and D. Couso, 3–10, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, D. 1995. ‘My Trouble in My English’: Asian Students and the American Dream. New Hampshire: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacy, Ideology in Discourses. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., M. A. Britt, W. Brown, G. Cribb, C. Shanahan, C. Shanahan, C. Shanahan, C. Shanahan, and P. READI. 2016. “Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding – A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy.” Educational Psychologist 51 (2): 219–246. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A., S. Kerkhoff, and H. Spires. 2017. “Disciplinary Literacy in the Middle School: Exploring Pedagogical Tensions.” Middle Grades Research Journal 11 (1): 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Hand, B., L. D. Yore, S. Jagger, and V. Prain. 2010. “Connecting Research in Science Literacy and Classroom Practice: A Review of Science Teaching Journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998–2008.” Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1080/03057260903562342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B., A. Cavagnetto, Y. C. Chen, and S. Park. 2016. “Moving past Curricula and Strategies: Language and the Development of Adaptive Pedagogy for Immersive Learning Environments.” Research in Science Education 46 (2): 223–241. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9499-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, B. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Writing in Science – A 25-year Journey.” Literacy Learning: the Middle Years 25 (3): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hannant, K., and A. Jetnikoff. 2017. “What Do Students Need to Know about Writing for Science in the Middle Years?” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 25 (1): 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K., and D. O’Brien. 2019. “Disciplinary Literacy: From Infusion to Hybridity.” Journal of Literacy Research 51 (4): 525–536. doi:10.1177/1086296X19876986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, B., I. Hay, and J. Dyment. 2017. “Students’ Reading Achievement during the Transition from Primary to Secondary School.” The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 40 (1): 46–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagger, S. L., and L. D. Yore. 2012. “Mind the Gap: Looking for evidence-based Practice of Science Literacy for All in Science Teaching Journals.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23 (6): 559–577. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9271-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., F. Quinn, and T. Lyons. 2018. “The Keys to STEM: Australian Year 7 Students’ Attitudes and Intentions Towards Science, Mathematics and Technology Courses.” Research in Science Education 50: 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 1997. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths of Literacy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, S. C. 2014. “Exploring the Roles of the Generative Vocabulary Matrix and Academic Literacy Engagement of Ninth Grade Biology Students.” Literacy Research and Instruction 53 (4): 287–325. doi:10.1080/19388071.2014.880974.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K., S. W. Brown, C. Rhoads, L. Lynn, S. Newton, K. Brodowiksa, J. Oren, J. Riel, S. Song, and M. Wang. 2018. “Promoting Students’ Science Literacy Skills through a Simulation of International Negotiations, the GlobalEd 2 Project.” Computers in Human Behaviour 78: 389–396. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. 2004. “The Literacies of Science.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction, edited by E. W. Saul, 33–47, Newark: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, M., and K. Skamp. 2008. “Engaging Students in Science across the Primary Secondary Interface: Listening to the Students’ Voice.” Research in Science Education 38: 501–527. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9063-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. 2004. “On the Material Consequences of Literacy.” Language and Education 18 (4): 331–335. doi:10.1080/09500780408666886.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., A. A. Junyent, and M. C. Tornatora. 2014. “Epistemic Evaluation and Comprehension of web-source Information on Controversial science-related Topics: Effects of a short-term Instructional Intervention.” Computers & Education 76: 143–157. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, M. A., and B. Hand. 2010. “A Secondary Reanalysis of Student Perceptions of non-traditional Writing Tasks over A ten Year Period.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (5): 518–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., K. Conradi, C. Lawrence, B. G. Jang, and J. P. Meyer. 2012. “Reading Attitudes of Middle School Students: Results of a US Survey.” Reading Research Quarterly 47 (3): 283–306. doi:10.1002/rrq.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillen, C. M., A. Graves-Demario, and D. Kieliszek. 2018. “Tackling Literacy: A Collaborative Approach to Developing Materials, for Assessing Science Literacy Skills in Content Classrooms through A STEM Perspective.” The Language and Literacy Spectrum 28 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, R., L. Scholes, G. Stahl, S. McDonald, B. Comber, and J. Lunn. 2021. “How Do Rural Australian Students’ Ethnogeographies Related to People and Place Influence Their STEM Career Aspirations?” International Journal of Science Education 43 (14): 2333–2350. doi:10.1080/09500693.2021.1961326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K., L. Unsworth, and L. Scholes. 2022. Literacy for Digital Futures: Mind, Body, Text. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2007. “Developing Socially Just subject-matter Instruction: A Review of the Literature on Disciplinary Literacy Teaching.” Review of Research in Education 31 (1): 1–44. doi:10.3102/0091732X07300046001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, L., C. Amanti, C. Neffe, and N. Gonzalez. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory into Practice 32 (2): 132–141. doi:10.1080/00405849209543534.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L., and N. Gonzalez. 1997. “Teachers as Social Scientists: Learning about Culture from Household Research.” In Race, Ethnicity and Multiculturalism: Missouri Symposium on Research and Educational Policy, Vol. 1, edited by P. M. Hall, 89–144. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. M. 2012. “‘Me as a Science Teacher’: Responding to a Small Network Survey to Assist Teachers with subject-specific Literacy Demands in the Middle Years of Schooling.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 37 (6): 73–95. doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n6.6.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K–12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group, T. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S. P., and L. M. Phillips. 2003. “How Literacy in Its Fundamental Sense Is Central to Scientific Literacy.” Science Education 87 (2): 224–240. doi:10.1002/sce.10066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., A. McConney, and A. Woods-McConney. 2019. “The Efficacy of inquiry-based Instruction in Science: A Comparative Analysis of Six Countries Using PISA 2015.” Research in Science Education 51: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2016. PISA 2015 results (volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. PISA, OECD Publishing. DOI:10.1787/9789264267510-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., W. Verlaan, and E. H. Cheek. 2013. “Fostering Proactive Reading Instruction within the Content Areas.” In School-based Interventions for Struggling Readers, K–8 (Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, Vol. 3, edited by E. Ortlieb and E. H. Cheek, 21–40. London, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G. 2017. “Making Sense of Citizen Science: Stories as a Hermeneutic Resource.” Energy Research and Social Science 31: 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., E. Moje, and C. Greenleaf. 2010. “Literacy and Science: Each in the Service of the Other.” Science 328 (5977): 459–463. doi:10.1126/science.1182595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., A. M. Knight, M. A. Cannady, J. B. Henderson, and K. L. McNeill. 2015. “Assessment at the Intersection of Science and Literacy.” Theory into Practice 54 (3): 228–237. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1044372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V. 2006. “Learning from Writing in Secondary Science: Some Theoretical and Practical Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 179–201. doi:10.1080/09500690500336643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S., L. Tomas, and M. Tones. 2011. “Writing Stories to Enhance Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (5): 685–707. doi:10.1080/09500691003728039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes, L. 2018. Boys, Masculinities and Reading: Gender Identity and Literacy as Social Practice. Critical Studies in Gender and Sexuality in Education Series. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, L., G. Stahl, B. Comber, S. McDonald, and J. Lunn Brownlee. 2021. “‘We Don’t Read in Science’: Student Perceptions of Literacy and Learning Science in Middle School.” Cambridge Journal of Education 51 (4): 451–466. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2020.1860192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes, L., and G. Stahl. 2022. “‘I’m Good at Science but I Don’t Want to Be a Scientist’: Australian Primary School Student Stereotypes of Science and Scientists.” International Journal of Inclusive Education 26 (9): 927–942. doi:10.1080/13603116.2020.1751316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., S. H. Broughton, I.-A. N. Diakidoy, P. Kendeou, and P. van den Broek. 2011. “Bridging Reading Comprehension and Conceptual Change in Science Education: The Promise of Refutation Text.” Reading Research Quarterly 46 (4): 374–393. doi:10.1002/RRQ.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., and D. Lombardi. 2020. “Evaluating Sources of Scientific Evidence and Claims in the post-truth Era May Require Plausibility Judgments.” Educational Psychologist 55 (3): 120–131. doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., L. Scholes, S. McDonald, and J. Lunn. 2021a. “Middle Years Students’ Engagement with Science in Rural and Urban Communities in Australia: Exploring Science Capital, place-based Knowledges and Familial Relationships.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 29 (1): 43–60. doi:10.1080/14681366.2019.1684351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G., L. Scholes, S. McDonald, R. Mills, and B. Comber. 2021b. “Boys, Science and Literacy: Place-based Masculinities, Reading Practices and the ‘Science Literate Boy’.” Research Papers in Education 1–29. doi:10.1080/02671522.2021.1964097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1995. Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography, and Education. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1997. “The Implications of ‘New Literacy Studies’ for Literacy Education.” English in Education 31 (3): 45–59. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.1997.tb00133.x.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s ‘New’ in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2008. “New Literacies, New Times: Development in Literacy Studies.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd ed., edited by N. Hornberger, 418–431. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K., and E. Moje. 2010. “Relating Multimodal Representations to the Literacies of Science.” Research in Science Education 40 (1): 81–85. doi:10.1007/s11165-009-9158-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, L., and S. M. Ritchie. 2015. “The Challenge of Evaluating Students’ Scientific Literacy in a writing-to-learn Context.” Research in Science Education 45: 41–58. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9412-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovani, C., and E. B. Moje. 2017. No More Telling as Teaching: Less Lecture, More Engaged Learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, D., C. Brock, and J. Morrison. 2018. “Engaging in Vocabulary Learning in Science: The Promise of Multimodal Instruction.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (3): 328–347. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1420267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zee, E. H., H. Janson, K. Winograd, M. Crowl, and A. Devitt. 2013. “Integrating Physics and Literacy Learning in a Physics Course for Prospective Elementary and Middle School Teachers.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 24: 665–691. doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9323-y.
   Google Scholar
• Villegas, A. M. 1991. Culturally Responsive Pedagogy for the 1990s and beyond. Clearinghouse on Teacher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, P., and D. Herro. 2016. “Lessons Learned: Collaborative Symbiosis and Responsive Disciplinary Literacy Teaching.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 59 (5): 539–549. doi:10.1002/jaal.476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. 2016. “Maths, Science Teachers Find It Hard, Principals Tell Australian Education Union Survey.” ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-04-01/lack-of-maths-and-science-teachers-queensland-principals/7292224
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., and R. Jesson. 2018. “A Case Study of Literacy Teaching in Six Middle- and high-school Science Classes in New Zealand.” In Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, edited by K.-S. Tang and K. Danielsson, 133–147, Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, B. 2015. “Careers ‘From’ but Not ‘In’ Science: Why are Aspirations to Be a Scientist Challenging for Minority Ethnic Students?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 979–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.21231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K., A. Franks, L. J. Kuo, E. McTigue, and J. Serrano. 2016. “Both Theory and Practice: Science Literacy Instruction and Theories of Reading.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (7): 1275–1292. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9661-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., G. L. Bisanz, and B. M. Hand. 2003. “Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 689–725. doi:10.1080/09500690305018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., and D. F. Treagust. 2006. “Current Realities and Future Possibilities: Language and Science Literacy – Empowering Research and Informing Instruction.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 291–314. doi:10.1080/09500690500336973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., D. Pimm, and H. L. Tuan. 2007. “The Literacy Component of Mathematical and Scientific Literacy.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 5: 559–589. doi:10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4.
   Google Scholar
• Zipin, L. 2009. “Dark Funds of Knowledge, Deep Funds of Pedagogy: Exploring Boundaries between Lifeworlds and Schools.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 30 (3): 317–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar