Understanding subject choices from report card grades: gender and educational level disparities

References

• Bakens, J., I. Bijlsma, S. Dijksman, D. Fouarge, and G. de Lombaerde 2019. De arbeidsmarkt naar opleiding en beroep tot 2024 [The labour market by education and occupation until 2024] (ROA Report No. 007). ROA. https://doi.org/10.26481/umarep.2019007.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, L., and M. Gordon. 2017. “Establishing a STEM Pipeline: Trends in Male and Female Enrollment and Performance in Higher Level Secondary STEM Courses.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (3): 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9693-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekema, A. F., and A. M. J. Habraken 2012. “Wat zal ik kiezen? Een onderzoek naar de overwegingen die een rol spelen bij het kiezen van een profiel in de derde klas” [What shall I choose? An investigation into the considerations that play a role in choosing a study profile in the ninth grade]. Master’s thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht University Student Theses Repository. https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/9981.
   Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2010). Leerlingen in het vwo kiezen steeds vaker natuurprofiel [Pupils in pre-university education are increasingly opting for a science study profile]. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2010/36/leerlingen-in-het-vwo-kiezen-steeds-vaker-natuurprofiel.
   Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. n.d. Vo; Leerlingen, Onderwijssoort in Detail, Leerjaar, Herkomst [Secondary Education; Students, Educational Level in Detail, Grade, Origin]. Accessed March 10, 2023. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/85379NED/table?ts=1678441261052.
   Google Scholar
• Denissen, J. J. A., N. R. Zarrett, and J. S. Eccles. 2007. “I Like to Do It, I’m Able, and I Know I Am: Longitudinal Couplings Between Domain-Specific Achievement, Self-Concept, and Interest.” Child Development 78 (2): 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. J. 2009. “An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40 (5): 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. 2013. “Notes on Women and the Economics Undergraduate Major.” CSWEP Newsletter 2013 ( Summer): 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. Li, M. J. Page, and V. A. Welch, Eds. 2021. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. Accessed February, 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins, R., and K. Vaughan 2019. “Subject Choice for the Future of Work: Insights from Research Literature”. New Zealand Council for Educational Research. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/NZC_NZCP%20-%20Research%20Literature%20Report.FINAL_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., J. Zhang, and L. Hudson. 2019. “Impact of Math Self-Efficacy, Math Anxiety, and Growth Mindset on Math and Science Career Interest for Middle School Students: The Gender Moderating Effect.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 34 (3): 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., E. A. Canning, C. S. Rozek, E. Clarke, C. S. Hulleman, and J. M. Harackiewicz. 2017. “The Role of mothers’ Communication in Promoting Motivation for Math and Science Course-Taking in High School.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 27 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannelli, C., and A. Duta. 2018. “Inequalities in School leavers’ Labour Market Outcomes: Do School Subject Choices Matter?” Oxford Review of Education 44 (1): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1409970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, D., D. D. Curtis, and L. N. Conner. 2020. “Student Factors Influencing STEM Subject Choice in Year 12: A Structural Equation Model Using PISA/LSAY Data.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (3): 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09972-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., D. L. Stone, and T. N. Phillips. 2008. “Relations Among Ethnicity, Gender, Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intention to Pursue a Career in Information Technology.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38 (4): 999–1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00336.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson, J. O. 1999. “Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice; an Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model.” European Sociological Review 15 (4): 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H. 2011. “Search for Science Talent in The Netherlands.” Doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/search-for-science-talent-in-the-netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., S. Guntern, and G. van der Werf. 2014. “The Impact of Significant Others on Gender-Atypical, Gender-Typical and Gender-Neutral Study Choices.” Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 45 (4): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-014-0263-1.
   Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., H. Kuyper, R. Bosker, and G. van der Werf. 2013. “Students Leaving the STEM Pipeline: An Investigation of Their Attitudes and the Influence of Significant Others on Their Study Choice.” Research Papers in Education 28 (4): 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2012.698299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., H. Kuyper, R. J. Bosker, and M. P. C. van der Werf. 2011. “Onderbenut bètatalent in Nederland [Underutilized science talent in the Netherlands].” Pedagogische Studiën 88 (6): 400–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpershoek, H., H. Kuyper, and G. van der Werf. 2008. “Zijn bèta’s nerds? Verschillen in persoonlijkheid, sociale contacten en vrijetijdsbesteding tussen jongens met natuur & techniek en jongens met andere profielen” [Are beta students nerds? Differences in personality, social contacts and leisure activities between boys with science & technology and boys with other study profiles]. Pedagogische Studiën 85 (3): 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Larose, S., C. F. Ratelle, F. Guay, C. Senécal, and M. Harvey. 2006. “Trajectories of Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs During the College Transition and Academic and Vocational Adjustment in Science and Technology Programs.” Educational Research & Evaluation 12 (4): 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765836.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., and D. Schröppel. 2014. “Prediction of Academic Performance Prior to Intersections within a Multi-Tiered School System.” Educational Research & Evaluation 20 (6): 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2014.975136.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K.-H., X.-L. Meng, T. E. Raghunathan, and D. B. Rubin. 1991. “Significance Levels from Repeated P-Values with Multiply-Imputed Data.” Statistica Sinica 1 (1): 65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., and F. L. Smyth. 2011. “Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (5): 1125–1156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211410683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost, B. 2010. “The Role of Peers and Grades in Determining Major Persistence in the Sciences.” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastergiou, M. 2008. “Are Computer Science and Information Technology Still Masculine Fields? High School students’ Perceptions and Career Choices.” Computers & Education 51 (2): 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Päßler, K., and B. Hell. 2012. “Do Interests and Cognitive Abilities Help Explain College Major Choice Equally Well for Women and Men?” Journal of Career Assessment 20 (4): 359–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712450009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peetsma, T., T. Hascher, I. van der Veen, and E. Roede. 2005. “Relations Between adolescents’ Self-Evaluations, Time Perspectives, Motivation for School and Their Achievement in Different Countries and at Different Ages.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 20 (3): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, S. R., and P. D. Umbach. 2006. “College Major Choice: An Analysis of Person–Environment Fit.” Research in Higher Education 47 (4): 429–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9002-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raabe, I. J., Z. Boda, and C. Stadtfeld. 2019. “The Social Pipeline.” Sociology of Education 92 (2): 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718824095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask, K., and J. Tiefenthaler. 2008. “The Role of Grade Sensitivity in Explaining the Gender Imbalance in Undergraduate Economics.” Economics of Education Review 27 (6): 676–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekers-Mombarg, L., H. Korpershoek, H. Kuyper, and M. van der Werf. 2010. Van studiehuis naar studentenhuis, de studeer-, werk- en persoonlijke situatie van havo- en vwo-eindexamen leerlingen [From study house to student house, the study, work and personal situation of senior general and pre-university final exam students]. Groningen, the Netherlands: GION, Gronings Instituut voor Onderzoek van Onderwijs, Opvoeding en Ontwikkeling, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Robitzsch, A., S. Grund, and T. Hencke. 2020. Package ‘Miceadds’. CRAN repository. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/miceadds/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., and M. López-Sáez. 2010. “Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and the Choice of Technology-Related Occupations in a Sample of Secondary Students in Spain.” Computers & Education 54 (2): 578–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanabria, T., and A. Penner. 2017. “Weeded Out? Gendered Responses to Failing Calculus.” Social Sciences 6 (2): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6020047.
   Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., M. Johns, and M. Barquissau. 2004. “The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women’s Experience in the Math Domain.” Sex Roles 50 (11–12): 835–850. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, D. L., D. Lubinski, and C. P. Benbow. 2001. “Importance of Assessing Spatial Ability in Intellectually Talented Young Adolescents: A 20-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (3): 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B., and R. J. Bosker. 2012. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Studiekeuze123. n.d. “Van Profiel Naar Studie” [From Study Profile to Study]. Accessed June 2, 2021. https://www.studiekeuze123.nl/van-profiel-naar-studie.
   Google Scholar
• Uerz, D., H. Dekkers, and A. Beguin. 2004. “Mathematics and Language Skills and the Choice of Science Subjects in Secondary Education.” Educational Research & Evaluation 10 (2): 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1076/edre.10.2.163.27908.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., and K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn. 2011. “Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 45 (3): 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, M., E. Jaspers, I. Maas, and T. van der Lippe. 2016. “Boys’ and girls’ Educational Choices in Secondary Education. The Role of Gender Ideology.” Educational Studies 42 (2): 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1160821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Langen, A., L. Rekers-Mombarg, and H. Dekkers. 2006. “Exact kiezen na de invoering van profielen in havo en vwo” [Choosing beta after the introduction of study profiles in senior general education and pre-university education]. Pedagogische Studiën 83 (2): 122–138.
   Google Scholar
• van Langen, A., and H. Vierke. 2009. Wat Bepaalt de Keuze Voor Een Natuurprofiel? De Invloed van de Leerling, de School, de Ouders En de Peergroup [What Determines the Choice of a Nature Study Profile? The Influence of the Student, the School, the Parents and the Peer Group]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Platform Bèta Techniek.
   Google Scholar
• Volodina, A., and G. Nagy. 2016. “Vocational Choices in Adolescence: The Role of Gender, School Achievement, Self-Concepts, and Vocational Interests.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 95-96:58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wai, J., D. Lubinski, and C. Benbow. 2009. “Spatial Ability for STEM Domains: Aligning Over 50 Years of Cumulative Psychological Knowledge Solidifies its Importance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (4): 817–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichgers, I., H. Korpershoek, M. J. Warrens, M. A. Dijks, and R. J. Bosker. 2019 June 26–28. “Profieladviezen van decanen en mentoren aan fictieve leerlingen” [Study profile recommendations from students counsellors and mentors to fictional students]. [Paper presentation]. Onderwijs Research Dagen 2019, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Wichgers, I. J. M., H. Korpershoek, M. J. Warrens, M. A. Dijks, and R. J. Bosker. 2022. “Study Profile Choices in Secondary Education: Searching for Factors Underlying the Recommendations Made by School Guidance Counsellors and Tutors to Vignette Students.” British Journal of Guidance & Counselling 51 (6): 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2022.2068504.
   Google Scholar
• Wijsman, L. A., M. J. Warrens, N. Saab, J. H. van Driel, and P. M. Westenberg. 2016. “Declining Trends in Student Performance in Lower Secondary Education.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 31 (4): 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0277-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander, L., E. Höhne, S. Harms, M. Pfost, and M. J. Hornsey. 2020. “When Grades are High but Self-Efficacy is Low: Unpacking the Confidence Gap Between Girls and Boys in Mathematics.” Frontiers in Psychology 11. Article 552355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar