68
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Sending motivational emails in text–picture personalised form can be feasible in e-learning: An asynchronous course case

&
Received 30 Sep 2022, Accepted 11 Dec 2023, Published online: 11 Mar 2024

References

  • Akhter, T. (2020). Problems and challenges faced by EFL students of Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 pandemic. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s23n5
  • Alexander, M. W., Zhao, J. J., & Underwood, R. A. (2002). An analysis of e-mail technologies used by business educators at the secondary and postsecondary levels. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 44 (2), 110–124. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95718/
  • Barton, E. E., & Wolery, M. (2007). Evaluation of e-mail feedback on the verbal behaviors of pre-service teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510703000105
  • Bismala, L., & Manurung, Y. H. (2021). Student satisfaction in e-learning along the COVID-19 pandemic with importance performance analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(3), 753–759. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21467
  • Borrella, I., Caballero-Caballero, S., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2019). Predict and intervene: Addressing the dropout problem in a MOOC-based program. Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale. https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333634
  • Casey, A. M., & McWilliam, R. A. (2008). Graphical feedback to increase teachers’ use of incidental teaching. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(3), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815108319038
  • Chang, C.-W., Hurst, B., & McLean, A. (2015). You’ve got mail: Student preferences of instructor communication in online courses in an age of advancing technologies. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 8(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0801.03
  • Dagman, A., & Wärmefjord, K. (2022). An evidence-based study on teaching computer aided design in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010029
  • D’Aniello, G., de Falco, M., Gaeta, M., & Lepore, M. (2020). Feedback generation using fuzzy cognitive maps to reduce dropout in situation-aware e-learning systems. 2020 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) (pp. 195–199). https://doi.org/10.1109/CogSIMA49017.2020.9216177
  • Denton, P., Madden, J., Roberts, M., & Rowe, P. (2008). Students’ response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x
  • Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002
  • Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
  • Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of p. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/2340521
  • Gyselinck, V., & Tardieu, H. (1999). The role of illustrations in text comprehension: What, when, for whom, and why? In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 195–218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., Luiselli, J. K., & Handler, M. W. (2007). Effects of verbal and graphic performance feedback on behavior support plan implementation in a public elementary school. Behavior Modification, 31(4), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445506297583
  • Hone, K. S., & Said, G. R. E. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016
  • Huett, J. B., Kalinowski, K. E., Moller, L., & Huett, K. C. (2008). Improving the motivation and retention of online students through the use of ARCS-based e-mails. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802224451
  • Inkelaar, T., & Simpson, O. (2015). Challenging the ‘distance education deficit’ through ‘motivational emails. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 30(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2015.1055718
  • Janke, R. (2014). Effects of mentioning the incentive prize in the email subject-line on survey response. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8VW27
  • Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1651
  • Jordan, K. (2015). Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112
  • Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
  • King, S. (2014). Graduate student perceptions of the use of online course tools to support engagement. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080105
  • Kurtz, G., Kopolovich, O., Segev, E., Sahar-Inbar, L., Gal, L., & Hammer, R. (2022). Impact of an instructor’s personalized email intervention on completion rates in a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.3.2376
  • Lambert, N. M., Stillman, T. F., Hicks, J. A., Kamble, S., Baumeister, R. F., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499186
  • Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
  • Lear, J. L., Ansorge, C., & Steckelberg, A. L. (2010). Interactivity/Community process model for the online education environment. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 71–77.
  • Legg, A. M., & Wilson, J. H. (2009). E-mail from professor enhances student motivation and attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902960034
  • Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 289–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_3
  • Lim, K. H., Lim, E.-P., Jiang, B., & Achananuparp, P. (2016). Using online controlled experiments to examine authority effects on user behavior in email campaigns. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 255–260). https://doi.org/10.1145/2914586.2914619
  • Li, L., & Pitts, J. (2009). Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 175–185. https://jise.org/
  • Malone, K. (2004). Holding environments”: Creating spaces to support children’s environmental learning in the 21st century. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 20(2), 53–66. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0814062600002202.
  • Margolis, A., López-Arredondo, A., García, S., Rubido, N., Caminada, C., González, D., & Tansini, L. (2019). Social learning in large online audiences of health professionals: Improving dialogue with automated tools. MedEdpublish, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2019.000055.1
  • Marler, E. K., Bruce, M. J., Abaoud, A., Henrichsen, C., Suksatan, W., Homvisetvongsa, S., & Matsuo, H. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000294
  • Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  • Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–49). Cambridge University Press.
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
  • Parte, L., & Mellado, L. (2021). Motivational emails in distance university. Journal of Educators Online, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2021.18.3.5
  • Reich, J. (2014). MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-completion-and-retention-in-the-context-of-student-intent
  • Reich, J., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2019). The MOOC pivot. Science, 363(6423), 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7958
  • Robb, C. A., & Sutton, J. (2014). The importance of social presence and motivation in distance learning. Journal of Technology, Management and Applied Engineering, 31, 1–10. https://www.iastatedigitalpress.com/jtmae/article/14144/galley/12908/view/
  • Rubin, K. (2021). The ultimate list of 394 email spam trigger words to avoid in 2021. HubSpot. https://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/30684/the-ultimate-list-of-email-spam-trigger-words.aspx
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  • Sappleton, N., & Lourenço, F. (2016). Email subject lines and response rates to invitations to participate in a web survey and a face-to-face interview: The sound of silence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(5), 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1078596
  • Schnotz, W. (2014). Integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 72–103). Cambridge University Press.
  • Simpson, O. (2013). Supporting students for success in online and distance education. Routledge.
  • Tinto, V. (1997). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Visser, L. (1998). The development of motivational communication in distance education support. University of Twente.
  • Visser, L., Plomp, T., Amirault, R. J., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students at a distance: The case of an international audience. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504998
  • Visser, L., Plomp, T., & Kuiper, W. (1999). Development research applied to improve motivation in distance education. The National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  • Voghoei, S., Hashemi Tonekaboni, N., Yazdansepas, D., Soleymani, S., Farahani, A., & Arabnia, H. (2020). Personalized feedback emails: A case study on online introductory computer science courses. ACM SE ’20 Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Southeast Conference, April 2020 (pp. 18–25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3374135.3385274
  • Winnicott, D. W. (1982). Playing and reality. Routledge Classics.
  • Xu, D., Solanki, S., McPartlan, P., & Sato, B. (2018). Easeing students into college: The impact of multidimensional support for underprepared students. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18778559
  • Yeager, D., Walton, G., & Cohen, G. L. (2013). Addressing achievement gaps with psychological interventions. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(5), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309400514
  • Zhao, F. (2021). Interviewer presence can affect learning with interview videos. E-Learning & Digital Media, 18(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753021995312
  • Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2021). Best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, dot, and tally. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 775721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775721
  • Zhao, F., & Gaschler, R. (2022). Graph schema and best graph type to compare discrete groups: Bar, line, and pie. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(991420). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991420
  • Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Kneschke, A., Radler, S., Haider, C., Duttine, H., & Haider, H. (2020). Origami folding: Taxing resources necessary for the acquisition of sequential skills. Public Library of Science ONE, 15(10), e0240226. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240226
  • Zhao, F., Gaschler, R., Schnotz, W., & Wagner, I. (2020). Regulating distance to the screen while engaging in difficult tasks. Frontline Learning Research, 8(6), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i6.663
  • Zhao, F., & Mahrt, N. (2018). Influences of comics expertise and comics types in comics reading. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 5(2), 2349–5219.
  • Zhao, F., Schnotz, W., Wagner, I., & Gaschler, R. (2014). Eye tracking indicators of reading approaches in text-picture comprehension. Frontline Learning Research, 2(5), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.98
  • Zhao, F., Schnotz, W., Wagner, I., & Gaschler, R. (2020). Texts and pictures serve different functions in conjoint mental model construction and adaptation. Memory & Cognition, 48(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00962-0
  • Zhao, F., Schützler, L., Christ, O., & Gaschler, R. (2023). Learning statistics with interactive data graphs using R shiny: Generally preferred, but not generally advantageous. Teaching Statistics, 45(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12324
  • Zhu, J., Bruhn, A., Yuan, C., & Wang, L. (2021). Comparing the effects of videoconference and email feedback on treatment integrity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 54(2), 618–635. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.810

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.