Requests to children by parents with aphasia

References

• Anglade, C., Le Dorze, G., & Croteau, C. (2018). Service encounter interactions of people living with moderate-to-severe post-stroke aphasia in their community. Aphasiology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1532068
   Google Scholar
• Anglade, C., Le Dorze, G., & Croteau, C. (2021). How clerks understand the requests of people living with aphasia in service encounters. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 35(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1745894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., & Kent, A. (2015). Offering alternatives as a way of issuing directives to children: Putting the worse option last. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronsson, K., & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse & Society, 22(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510392124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P., & Bauer, A. (2011). Multimodality in aphasic conversation: Why gestures sometimes do not help. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2(2), 215–243. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v2i2.215
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., Candlin, C. N., & Ferguson, A. (2013). Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: A case study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00186.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Cooper, F. (2011). Redesigning therapy for agrammatism: Initial findings from the ongoing evaluation of a conversation-based intervention study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, E., Ekker, M. S., Putaala, J., Kittner, S., De Leeuw, F.-E., & Tuladhar, A. M. (2020). Ischaemic stroke in young adults: A global perspective. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 91(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2001). Working with Spoken Discourse. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies, 30(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., & Auer, P. (2009). Aphasie im Alltag (L. Springer & D. Schrey-Dern, Eds.). Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. (2015). The Coordination of Talk and Touch in Adults’ Directives to Children: Touch and Social Control. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A. (2009). Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben—Partizipation in aphasischen Alltagsgesprächen. University of Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, C., Ferguson, S., Green, A., & Winter, D. (2018). ‘It’s nothing you could ever prepare anyone for’: The experiences of young people and their families following parental stroke. Brain Injury, 32(4), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1426879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven, A., & Potter, J. (2010). Directives: Entitlement and contingency in action. Discourse Studies, 12(4), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445610370126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and Action: A Comparison of Two Forms of Requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A. (2020). Imperative im Deutschen: Konstruktionen, Praktiken oder social action formats? In B. Weidner, K. König, W. Imo, & L. Wegner (Eds.), Verfestigungen in der Interaktion (pp. 195–230). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110637502-009
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2014). Requesting in Social Interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 26(4–5), 515–543.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2009). Producing Sense with Nonsense Syllables: Turn and Sequence in Conversations with a Man with Severe Aphasia*. In P. Griffiths, A. J. Merrison, & A. Bloomer (Eds.), Language in Use (1st ed., pp. 272–285). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060994-27
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2013). Calibration in directive/response sequences in family interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grawburg, M., Howe, T., Worrall, L., & Scarinci, N. (2019). Family-Centered Care in Aphasia: Assessment of Third-Party Disability in Family Members With the Family Aphasia Measure of Life Impact. Topics in Language Disorders, 39(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G. M., & Bettger, J. P. (2018). Parenting after stroke: A systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 25(5), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2018.1452366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2006). ‘Will you or can’t you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V. (2011). Die Herstellung kommunikativer Kontexte in familialen Tischgesprächen. In K. Birkner & D. Meer (Eds.), Institutionalisierter Alltag: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in unterschiedlichen Praxisfeldern (pp. 92–116). Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer, H., & Reineke, S. (2021). Instruktionen und Aufforderungen in Theorie und Praxis – Einparken im Fahrunterricht. Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 22, 114–150.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Der Aachner Aphasie Test (AAT). Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation Analysis (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. (1990). Spatial organization in social encounters: The F-formation system. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters (pp. 209–238). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P. (2016). Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A. (2011). Directing dinnertime: Practices and resources used by parents and children to deliver and respond to directive actions. Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A., & Kendrick, K. H. (2016). Imperative Directives: Orientations to Accountability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(3), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1201737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmer, H., Svennevig, J., & Beeke, S. (2022). Joint planning in conversations with a person with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmer, H. (in prep.). How parents with aphasia deal with children’s resistance to requests.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzmüller, G., Asplund, K., & Häggström, T. (2012). The Long-Term Experience of Family Life After Stroke. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 44(1), E1–E13. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0b013e31823ae4a1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, P., & Edmonds, A. (2017). How L2 learners of French and English express modality using verbal means: A crosslinguistic and developmental study. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0108
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, A. (2005). Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In A. Hakulinen & M. Selting (Eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in interaction (pp. 209–230). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Godt, S. (2016). Recipient participation in conversations involving participants with fluent or non-fluent aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(10), 770–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2016.1221997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2020). “By the Way” … How People With Aphasia and Their Communication Partners Initiate New Topics of Conversation. American Journal of Speech - Language Pathology (Online), 29(1S), 375–392. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uio.no/10.1044/2019_AJSLP375392. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uio.no/10.1044/2019_AJSLPCAC48180198180198
   Google Scholar
• Manning, M., MacFarlane, A., Hickey, A., Galvin, R., & Franklin, S. (2021). ‘I hated being ghosted’ – The relevance of social participation for living well with post‐stroke aphasia: Qualitative interviews with working aged adults. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1504–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2006). Video recording as the reflexive preservation and configuration of phenomenal features for analysis. In H. Knoblauch, J. Raab, H.-G. Soeffner, & B. Schnettler (Eds.), Video analysis (pp. 51–68). Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Family narrative as political activity. Discourse & Society, 3(3), 301–340.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2007). Conversation Analysis. In C. Seale (Ed.), Qualitative research practice (Concise pbk. ed, pp. 153–167). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (2011). Validity in research on naturally occurring social interaction. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research (pp. 365–382). Sage London.
   Google Scholar
• Pointon, K. D. (2018). Hand 5. https://openclipart.org/detail/293196/hand-5
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. (2015). The request system in Italian interaction. Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., & Pitt, R. (2018). “It took the spark from him for a little while”: A case study on the psychological impact of parental stroke and aphasia on a young boy. Aphasiology, 32(sup1), 189–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1485858
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2005). On Complainability. Social Problems, 52(4), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barden, B., Bergmann, J., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Günthner, S., Meier, C., Quasthoff, U., Schlobinski, P., Uhmann, S., & others. (1998). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte, 91–122.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J. R., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, Jörg, Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., … Uhmann, S. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 353–402.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., … Uhmann, S. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung - Online- Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion, 12, 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Shrubsole, K., Pitt, R., Till, K., Finch, E., & Ryan, B. (2020). Speech language pathologists’ practice with children of parents with an acquired communication disability: A preliminary study. Brain Impairment, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2020.11
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2012). Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Svennevig, J. (2015). Introduction: Epistemics and deontics in conversational directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. (2016). Gestische Praxis und sprachliche Form. In A. Deppermann, H. Feilke, & A. Linke (Eds.), Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110451542-004
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tiar, A. M. V., & Dumas, J. E. (2015). Impact of parental acquired brain injury on children: Review of the literature and conceptual model. Brain Injury, 29(9), 1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.976272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse Crepaldi, Y. (2017). Requests for actions and their responses in caregiver-child interactions: A conversation analytic approach [ Nanyang Technological University]. https://doi.org/10.32657/10356/72525
   Google Scholar
• Tsuitsui, T. (2006). Zur Funktion der Abtönungspartikel „mal“ Anhand eines Vergleichs mit der japanischen Gradpartikel „chotto“. Neue Beiträge Zur Germanistik, 131, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomenoksa, A., Beeke, S., & Klippi, A. (2021). People with non-fluent aphasia initiating actions in everyday conversation with familiar conversation partners: Resources for participation. Aphasiology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1852518
   Google Scholar
• Urbanik, P. (2021). Directives in the construction site: Grammatical design and work phases in second language interactions with crane operators. Journal of Pragmatics, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.016
   Google Scholar
• Visser-Meily, A., Post, M., Meijer, A. M., van de Port, I., Maas, C., & Lindeman, E. (2005). When a Parent Has a Stroke: Clinical Course and Prediction of Mood, Behavior Problems, and Health Status of Their Young Children. Stroke, 36(11), 2436–2440. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000185681.33790.0a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13(4), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar