Aphasia outcome measurement in clinical practice: An international survey

References

• Al-Muqiren, T., Al-Eisa, E., Alghadir, A. & Anwer, S. (2017). Implementation and use of standardised outcome measures by physical therapists in Saudi Arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions. BMC Health Services Research 17, Article 748. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2693-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, H., Wallace, S., Ryan, B., Finch, E. & Shrubsole, K. (2020). Current practice and barriers and facilitators to outcome measurement in aphasia rehabilitation: a cross-sectional study using the theoretical domains framework. Aphasiology 34(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1678090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., Robertson, N., Wensing, M., Fiander, M., Eccles, M., Godycki-Cwirko, M., van Lieshout, J. & Jager, C. (2015). Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015(4), CD005470. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S. & Robertson, N. (2010). Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, F., Atkins, L. & Lusignan, S. (2016). Applying the COM-B behaviour model and behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to improve hearing-aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation. International Journal of Audiology 55(3), S90–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1120894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, J. & Fisher, M.J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association 22(2), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.738299924514584
   Google Scholar
• Cane, J., O’Connor, D. & Michie, S. (2012). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science 37(7).
   Google Scholar
• Centeno, J.G. (2015). Assessing services with communicatively impaired bilingual adults in culturally and linguistically diverse neurorehabilitation programs. Journal of Communication Disorders 58(1), 59–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (n.d.). Field Listing Languages. World Factbook. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/languages/
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L., McMahon, N., Redfern, J., Watkins, C. & Eng, J. (2015). Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Implementation Science 10(34). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0223-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. & Clark, P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Botting, N., Boyle, M., Hersh, D., Pritchard, M. & Dipper, L. (2020). UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 55(3), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of African, Middle Eastern, and South Asian Languages and Literatures (AMESALL) (n.d.). Languages. Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. https://amesall.rutgers.edu/languages/128-akan-twi#:~:text=Asante%20Twi%20is%20the%20widely,a%20first%20and%20second%20language.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, E. & Murray, J. (2012). The barriers and facilitators to routine outcome measurement by allied health professionals in practice: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 12, 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. (2004). Improving the quality of web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). Journal of Medical Internet Research 6(3), e34. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, A., O’Halloran, R., Rose, M. & Worrall, L. (2014). “Communication is taking a back seat”: speech pathologists’ perceptions of aphasia management in acute hospital settings. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2014.985185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyndanis, V., Lind, M., Varlokosta, S., Kambanaros, M., Soroli, E., Ceder, K., Grohmann, K., Rofes, A., Simonsen, H., Bjekic, J., Gavarro, A., Kralijevic, J., Martinez-Ferreiro, S., Munarriz, A., Pourquie, M., Vuksanovic, J., Zakarias, L. & Howard, D. (2017). Cross-linguistic adaptations of The Comprehensive Aphasia Test: Challenges and solutions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 31(7–9), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1310299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grol, R. & Wensing, M. (2004). What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Medical Journal of Australia 180(6), S57. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBMCorp. (2017). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 25.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jette, D., Halbert, J., Iverson, C., Miceli, E. & Shah, P. (2009). Use of standardised outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Physical Therapy 89(2), 125–35. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Simmons-Mackie, S., Rowland, A., Huijbregts, M., Shumway, E., McEwen, S., Threats, T. & Sharp, S. (2008). Counting what counts: A framework for capturing real-life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology 22(3), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701282595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kall, I., Larsson, M. & Bernhardsson, S. (2016). Use of outcome measures improved after a tailored implementation in primary care physiotherapy: a prospective, controlled study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12513
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., Cherney, L.R., Kagan, A., Haley, K.L., Antonucci, S.M., Schwartz, M., Holland, A.L. & Simmons-Mackie, S. (2018). Aphasia assessments: a survey of clinical and research settings. Aphasiology 32(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/10.1080/02687038.2018.1487923
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. Sellman, J., Heikkinen, P. & Laine, M. (2012). Current clinical practices in aphasia therapy in Finland: Challenges in moving towards national best practice. Folio Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 64(4), 169–78. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. (2011). Family members’ report on speech-language pathology and community services for persons with aphasia in Hong Kong. Disability Rehabilitation 33(25–26), 2633–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.579220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., Huby, G., Irving, A. & Pringle, A. (2009). Reconciling the perspective of practitioner and service user: Findings from The Aphasia in Scotland study. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 45(5), 551–60. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820903308509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft, M., Martinsen, B., Esbensen, B. & Mathiesen, L. (2017). Strengthening the role and functions of nursing staff in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: developing a complex intervention using the Behaviour Change Wheel. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 12(2), 1392218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2017.1392218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. & Williams, M. (2005). Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physiotherapy management of lung transplant patients in Australia and New Zealand. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 21(4), 201–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593980500321093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCracken, A., O’Donoghue, A. & Peel, R. (2021). Utilisation of outcome measures by therapy teams in an NHS Trust. Morecambe Bay Medical Journal 8. https://doi.org/10.48037/mbmj.v8i9.1285
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, B., Stillwell, S., Hart, S. & Davis, R. (2018). Breaking down barriers to the utilisation of standardised tests and outcome measures in acute care physical therapist practice: An observational longitudinal study. Physical Therapy 98(6), 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Atkins, K. & West, R. (2014). The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. Silverback Publishing. https://www.behaviourchangewheel.com
   Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Stralen, M. & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 6(42). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norvik, M.I., Lind, M. & Jenson, B.U. (2022). Working with multilingual aphasia: attitudes and practices among speech and language pathologists in Norway. International Multilingual Research Journal 1(18). https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2021.2015935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. & Wallace, S. (2014). Speech language pathologists’ opinions of constraint-induced language therapy. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 21(4), 332–8. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr2104-332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, K., Brandal, R., Karlsson, F. & Johansson, M. (2021). Do best practice recommendations align with current aphasia practices in the Swedish care context: a national survey. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1917504
   Google Scholar
• Qualtrics (2021). Provo, Utah, USA. https://www.qualtrics.com
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians (RCP) Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party (2016). National Clinical Guideline for Stroke. Available at: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/stroke-guidelines. Accessed 15/06/2022).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M., Ferguson, A., Power, E., Togher, L. & Worrall, L. (2014). Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions. International Journal of Speech- Language Pathology 16(2), 160–80. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2013.794474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubsole, K., Worrall, L., Power, E. & O’Connor, D. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to meeting aphasia guideline recommendations: what factors influence speech pathologists’ practice? Disability and Rehabilitation 41(13), 1596–1607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1432706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Threats, T. & Kagan, A. (2005). Outcome measurement in aphasia: a survey. Journal of Communication Disorders 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 7, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation (2022). Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management. Retrieved October 16, 2021, from https://informme.org.au/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management
   Google Scholar
• Swinkels, R., Peppen, R., Wittink, H., Custers, J. & Beurskens, A. (2011). Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22(12), 106. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney-Hendricks, C., Schliep, M.E. & Vallila-Rohter, S. (2022). Using an implementation framework to survey outcome measurement and treatment practices in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 31(1), 1133–1162. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Dorze, G., Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., Babbitt, E., Bose, A., Brady, M., Cherney, L., Copland, D., Cruice, M., Enderby, P., Hersh, D., Howe, T., Kelly, H., Kiran, S., Laska, A., Marshall, J., Nicholas, M., Patterson, J., Pearl, G., Rochon, E., Rose, M., Sage, K., Small, S. & Webster, J. (2019). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke 14(2), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Sullivan, B., Rose, T. A., Worrall, L., Le Dorze, G., & Shrubsole, K. (2021). Core Outcome Set Use in Poststroke Aphasia Treatment Research: Examining Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation Using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR, 64(10), 3969–3982. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00683
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, K. (2017). Web-based survey methodology. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_18-1
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., Shrubsole, K., Worrall, L. & Power, E. (2018). Factors that influence Australian speech-language pathologists’ self-reported uptake of aphasia rehabilitation recommendations from clinical practice guidelines. Aphasiology 32(6), 646–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1443201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar