An examination of sample length and reliability of the Interactional Network Tool, a new measure of group interactions in acquired brain injury

References

• Adams, C., 2005, Social communication intervention for school-age children: Rationale and description. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-917123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlsen, A., and Saldert, C. (2018). Activity-based communication analysis – focusing on context in communication partner training. Aphasiology, 32:10, 1194–1214, DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1464645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the “current-speaker-selects-next” rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies, 23(2), pp. 117–140. doi: 10.1177/1461445620966922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, N., Togher, L., Power, E. and Heard, R. (2012). Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(13–14), pp. 1702–1715. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Maxim, J., Heilemann, C., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Edwards, S.I., Howard, D. and Beeke, S. (2016). Conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: a group and case series investigation of changes in interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(10), p. 562. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), pp. 284–290. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, A., van Steenbrugge, W. and Scholten, I. (2010). Judging conversation: how much is enough?. Aphasiology, 24(5), pp. 612–622. doi: 10.1080/02687030902732752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M. (1984). Conversation analysis and social skills training. In Trower, P. (ed.), Radical Approaches to Social Skills Training. The University of Michigan: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, C., Hawley, L., Morey, C., Newman, J., Cusick, C.P. and Harrison-Felix, C., 2006, Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: three perspectives. Brain Injury, 20(4), pp. 425–435. doi: 10.1080/02699050600664574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doedens, W.J. and Meteyard, L. (2020). Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: a critical review. Aphasiology, 34 (4), 492–514. doi:10.1080/02687038.2019.1702848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggins, S. and Slade, D. (2005). Analysing Casual Conversation. London, Equinox
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., Bergström, S., Carlsson, E., Hartelius, L., Johansson, C., Schwarz, A., & Saldert, C. (2014). Aspects of rating communicative interaction: Effects on reliability and agreement. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 5(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1558/jircd.v5i2.245
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R.G., Rigon, A. and Duff, M.C. (2015). Conversational synchrony in the communicative interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 29 (11), pp. 1300–1308. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1042408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. G., Tranel, D. and Duff, M. C. (2014). The physiological basis of synchronizing conversational rhythms: the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychology 28 (4), pp. 624–630. doi: 10.1037/neu0000073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, L.L. and Jensen, P.J., 1991, Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5(3), pp. 267–285. doi: 10.3109/02699059109008097.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horton S., Clark A., Barton G., Lane, K. and Pomeroy, V.M. (2016). Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster- controlled feasibility study. BMJ Open 6:e011207. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. (2018). Measuring outcomes from a peer-led social communication skills intervention for adults following acquired brain injury. Thesis (PhD), UCL (University College London). https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10059713
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S., Beeke, S., Pring, T. and Varley, R. (2020a). Measuring outcomes of a peer-led social communication skills intervention for adults with acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 31(7): 1069–1090. doi: 10.1080/09602011.176892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S., Varley, R., Sinnott, E. L., Pring, T., & Beeke, S. (2020b). Measuring group social interactions following acquired brain injury: an inter-rater reliability evaluation. Aphasiology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1836315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Black, S.E., Duchan, J.F., Simmons-Mackie N. and Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversation partners using ‘Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia’ (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 44 (3): 624–638. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Winckel, J., Black, S., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N. and Square, P. (2004). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 11 (1): 67–83. DOI:10.1310/CL3V-A94A-DE5C-CVBE.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keegan, L.C., Behn, N., Power, E., Howell, S., and Rietdijk, R. (2022). Assessing Conversation after Traumatic Brain Injury. In C. Coehlo, L.R. Cherney and B.B. Shadden (Eds.), Discourse Analysis in Adults With and Without Communication Disorders: A Resource for Clinicians and Researchers. Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K. and Li, M.Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15(2): 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.2307/2804509.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw K.O. and Wong SP (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods 1(1):30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L.B., Boers, M., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., Bouter, L.M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D.L., de Vet, H.C.W. and Terwee, C.B. (2020). COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 20 (293)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Off, C., Rogers, M. and Alarcon, N. (2006). Three Methods of Quantifying the Quality of Communication in Aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Ghent, Belgium, 29 May- 2nd June 2006. http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/1747/
   Google Scholar
• Post, M.W. (2016). What to do with “moderate” reliability and validity coefficients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(7), pp.1051–1052. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietdijk, R., Power, E., Brunner, M., & Togher, L. (2020). The reliability of evaluating conversations between people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners via videoconferencing. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(6) 1074–1091, https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2018.1554533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Backman, E., & Hartelius, L. (2013). Conversation partner training with spouses of persons with aphasia: A pilot study using a protocol to trace relevant characteristics. Aphasiology, 27(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.710317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C.,Jensen, L.R., Blom Johansson, M and Simmons-Mackie, N. (2018). Complexity in measuring outcomes after communication partner training: alignment between goals of intervention and methods of evaluation. Aphasiology, 32:10, 1167–1193. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1470317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. (2017). Social Network Analysis. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), pp. 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, P., Power, E. and Togher, L. (2013). Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: using exchange structure analysis. Brain Injury, 27(6), pp. 717–742. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.775485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg, M.M., MacDonald, S., Byom, L., Iwashita, H., Lemoncello, R., Meulenbroek, P., Ness, B. and O’Neil-Pirozzi, T.M. (2019). Social communication following traumatic brain injury part I: State-of-the-art review of assessment tools, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21:2, 115–127, DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2019.1583280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E. and Rietdijk, R. (2013). Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(7), pp. 637–645. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Power, E., Tate, R., McDonald, S. and Rietdijk, R. (2010). Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology, 24 (6–8), pp. 914–927. doi: 10.1080/02687030903422478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M. and Turkstra, L.S. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), pp. 353–368. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trower, P., Bryant, B. and Argyle, M. (1978). Social Skills and Mental Health. Hove, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L.E., Rose, T and Le Dorze, G. (2018). Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point? A core outcome set … or greater standardisation of discourse measures? Aphasiology, 32(4), pp. 479–482. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2017.1398811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R, 1999, Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13 (4–5), pp. 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar