Case Report: Neural correlates of orthographic congruency effects in auditory rhyme judgment in two stroke survivors

References

• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (release 2). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania. https://doi.org/10.35111/gs6s-gm48
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T., & Dronkers, N. F. (2003). Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience, 6(5), 448–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitan, T., Burman, D. D., Chou, T. L., Lu, D., Cone, N. E., Cao, F., et al. (2007). The interaction between orthographic and phonological information in children: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping. 28, 880–891. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, V., Van Atteveldt, N., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2008). Task‐irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex. European journal of neuroscience, 28(3), 500–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, V., Reithler, J., Van Atteveldt, N., Seitz, J., Gerretsen, P., Goebel, R., et al. (2010). Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. Brain 133, 868–879. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David (2021). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6. 2.19. http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bonte, M., Correia, J. M., Keetels, M., Vroomen, J., & Formisano, E. (2017). Reading-induced shifts of perceptual speech representations in auditory cortex. Scientific Reports, 7(1),1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan, C., Cao, F., Pedroarena, Leal, N., McNorgan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2013). Reading acquisition reorganizes the phonological awareness network only in alphabetic writing systems. Human Brain Mapping, 34(12),3354–3368. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Holmes, V. M., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(3),445–467. DOI:10.1080/02724980244000486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang, C. T., Lee, C. Y., Chou, C. J., Fuh, J. L., & Wu, H. C. (2016). Predictability effect on N400 reflects the severity of reading comprehension deficits in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 81, 117–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenausky, K., Paquette, S., Norton, A., & Schlaug, G. (2020). Apraxia of speech involves lesions of dorsal arcuate fasciculus and insula in patients with aphasia. In Neurology: Clinical Practice (Vol. 10, Issue 2, pp. 162–169). https://doi.org/10.1212/cpj.0000000000000699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coch, D. (2018). A picture is worth … both spelling and sound. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2006). Acquired dyslexias and the computational modelling of reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(1), 96–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults, Second edition. Pro-Ed, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open-source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien, J., Beal, D. J., & Berg, P. (2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical neurophysiology, 116(8), 1808–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien, J. (2010). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1),138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1(4),371–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1999). Phases of development in learning to read words. In J. Oakhill, & R. Bard (Eds.), Reading development and the teaching of reading: A psychological perspective (pp.79–108). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, M. E., Henderson, M. P., Snider, S. F., Hayward, W., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2019). Self-reported inner speech relates to phonological retrieval ability in people with aphasia. Consciousness and cognition, 71, 18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, M. E., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2020). Inner speech in aphasia: current evidence, clinical implications, and future directions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1S), 560–573.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinberg, T. E., Rothi, L. J. G., & Heilman, K. M. (1986). ‘Inner speech’in conduction aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 43(6), 591–593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geva, S., Jones, P. S., Crinion, J. T., Price, C. J., Baron, J. C., & Warburton, E. A. (2011). The neural correlates of inner speech defined by voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping. Brain, 134(10), 3071–3082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geva, S., & Warburton, E. A. (2019). A test battery for inner speech functions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(1),97–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acy018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., & Richardson, U. (2005). The effects of spelling consistency on phonological awareness: a comparison of English and German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Swaab, T. Y. (1996). Lexical—semantic event–related potential effects in patients with left hemisphere lesions and aphasia, and patients with right hemisphere lesions without aphasia. Brain, 119(2), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.627
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kallionpää, R. E., Pesonen, H., Scheinin, A., Sandman, N., Laitio, R., Scheinin, H., … & Valli, K. (2019). Single-subject analysis of N400 event-related potential component with five different methods. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 144, 14–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA : Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (English edition.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kronschnabel, J., Brem, S., Maurer, U., & Brandeis, D. (2014). The level of audiovisual print–speech integration deficits in dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 62, 245–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP). Annual review of psychology, 62, 621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, E. H., Skipper-Kallal, L. M., Xing, S., Fama, M. E., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017). Mapping Common Aphasia Assessments to Underlying Cognitive Processes and Their Neural Substrates. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31(5), 442–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316688797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langland-Hassan, P., Faries, F. R., Richardson, M. J., & Dietz, A. (2015). Inner speech deficits in people with aphasia. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(1),1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., & Nickels, L. (2007). Orthographic cueing in anomic aphasia: How does it work? Aphasiology, 21(6–8), 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701192182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Lytle, M. N., McNorgan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2019). A longitudinal neuroimaging dataset on multisensory lexical processing in school-aged children. Scientific Data, 6(1), 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, E. B., Conway, T., Henry, M. L., Spencer, K. A., Yorkston, K. M., & Kendall, D. L. (2018). The relationship between non-orthographic language abilities and reading performance in chronic aphasia: An exploration of the primary systems hypothesis. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 61(12), 3038–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB. (2019a). Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, P., & Coch, D. (2019). An ERP study of cross‐modal rhyming: Influences of phonology and orthography. Psychophysiology, 56(4), e13311. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montant, M., Schön, D., Anton, J. L., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). Orthographic contamination of Broca’s area. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulton, E., Bouhali, F., Monzalvo, K., Poupon, C., Zhang, H., Dehaene, S., … & Dubois, J. (2019). Connectivity between the visual word form area and the parietal lobe improves after the first year of reading instruction: a longitudinal MRI study in children. Brain Structure and Function, 224(4), 1519–1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(2),155–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 935–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillay, S. B., Stengel, B. C., Humphries, C., Book, D. S., & Binder, J. R. (2014). Cerebral localization of impaired phonological retrieval during rhyme judgment. Annals of neurology, 76(5), 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perre, L., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). On-line activation of orthography in spoken word recognition. Brain Research, 1188, 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perre, L., Midgley, K., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009). When beef primes reef more than leaf: Orthographic information affects phonological priming in spoken word recognition. Psychophysiology, 46(4),739–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00813.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polich, J., McCarthy, G., Wang, W. S., & Donchin, E. (1983). When words collide: Orthographic and phonological interference during word processing. Biological Psychology, 16(3–4), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(83)900224)900224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praamstra, P., & Stegeman, D. F. (1993). Phonological effects on the auditory N400 event-related brain potential. Cognitive Brain Research, 1(2),73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(93)90013U)90013U
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime Go]. (2012). Retrieved from https://support.pstnet.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Richlan, F. (2019). The functional neuroanatomy of letter-speech sound integration and its relation to brain abnormalities in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanovska, L., & Bonte, M. (2021). How Learning to Read Changes the Listening Brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. (1984). Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words. Neuropsychologia, 22(4),435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(84)900381)900381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saletta, M., Goffman, L., & Brentari, D. (2016). Reading skill and exposure to orthography influence speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 411. doi: 10.1017/S0142716415000053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard, J., Nerantzini, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2017). Implicit learning and implicit treatment outcomes in individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1147526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silkes, J. P., & Anjum, J. (2021). The role and use of event-related potentials in aphasia: A scoping review. Brain and Language, 219, 104966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov, A. N. (1972) Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, B. C., Geva, S., & Warburton, E. A. (2017). Inner speech’s relationship with overt speech in poststroke aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(9), 2406–2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, T., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1997). Spoken sentence comprehension in aphasia: Event-related potential evidence for a lexical integration deficit. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 9(1), 39–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985). The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(3),320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)900312)900312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2013). The effect of imagination on stimulation: the functional specificity of efference copies in speech processing. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 25(7), 1020–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2014). Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). TOWRE-2 examiner’s manual. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Van Atteveldt, N., Roebroeck, A., and Goebel, R. (2009). Interaction of speech and script in human auditory cortex: insights from neuro-imaging and effective connectivity. Hear Res. 258, 152–164. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Pines, J., Joanisse, M., & Booth, J. R. (2021). Reciprocal relations between reading skill and the neural basis of phonological awareness in 7- to 9-year-old children. NeuroImage, 236, 118083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, G. S., Rochon, E., & Caplan, D. (1992). The role of high-level speech planning in rehearsal: Evidence from patients with apraxia of speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90005I)90005I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber-Fox, C., Spencer, R. M., SpruillIII, J. E., & Smith, A. (2004). Phonologic processing in adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1244–1258. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/094)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. (1995). Monitoring the time course of phonological encoding. Journal of memory and language, 34(3), 311–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., Schröger, E., & Maess, B. (2015). Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach. In Journal of Neuroscience Methods (Vol. 250, pp. 34–46). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, M., DeMarco, A. T., & Wilson, S. M. (2019). Adaptive paradigms for mapping phonological regions in individual participants. NeuroImage, 189, 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 683–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar