Agrammatic output in non-fluent, including Broca’s, aphasia as a rational behavior

References

• Ansell, B. J., & Flowers, C. R. (1982). Aphasic adults' understanding of complex adverbial sentences. Brain and Language, 15(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90048-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1985). On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatism. Cognition, 20(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90049-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2014). Modeling Human Plan Recognition Using Bayesian Theory of Mind. In Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition (pp. 177–204). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398532-3.00007-5
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Friederici, A., & Wulfeck, B. (1987). Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 32(1), 19–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the Inseparability of Grammar and the Lexicon: Evidence from Acquisition, Aphasia and Real-time Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(5–6), 507–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386628
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & Wulfeck, B. (1989). Comparative aphasiology: A cross-linguistic approach to language breakdown. Aphasiology, 3(2), 111–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038908248981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bautista, A., & Wilson, S. M. (2016). Neural responses to grammatically and lexically degraded speech. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 567–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1123281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, J., De Bleser, R., Dronsek, C. (1987). Form und Funktion von Kasus bei Agrammatismus. , and J. Bayer (Ed.), Grammatik und Kognition: Psycholinguistische Untersuchungen, 1 Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte , pp. 81–117 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85659-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Beeke, S. (2003). ‘I suppose’ as a resource for the construction of turns at talk in agrammatic aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17, 291–298 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0269920031000080055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S. (2013). Aphasia: the pragmatics of everyday conversation. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg (ed.), Cognitive Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, Vol. 4], Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (pp. 345–371 https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214215.345).
   Google Scholar
• Bek, J., Blades, M., Siegal, M., Varley, R. (2010). Language and spatial reorientation: evidence from severe aphasia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 36 (3), 646–658. doi:10.1037/a001828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R.S. (1987). Symptom Co-occurrence and Dissociation in the Interpretation of Agrammatism In M. Coltheart, M. Sartori, R. Job (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuropsychology of Language, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale ( 1987), pp. 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, R.S. (1991). Sentence processing in aphasia. In M.T. Sarno (Ed.), Acquired aphasia (2nd ed.) (pp. 223–270). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, R.S. (1997). Patterns of sentence comprehension in aphasia: A consideration of three hypotheses. Brain and Language, 60, 197–221 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., & Caramazza, A. (1980). Semantic operations deficits in sentence comprehension. Psychological Research, 41(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56, 107–137 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berube, S., & Hillis, A. E. (2019). Advances and innovations in aphasia treatment trials. Stroke, 50(10), 2977–2984 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, A., & Bates, E. (1995). Inducing Agrammatic Profiles in Normals: Evidence for the Selective Vulnerability of Morphology under Cognitive Resource Limitation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(2), 228–257. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, I., Balewski, Z., Mahowald, K., & Fedorenko, E. (2016). Syntactic processing is distributed across the language system. Neuroimage, 127, 307–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonhoeffer, K. 1902. Zur Kenntnis der Ruckbildung motorischer Aphasien. Miteilungenaus den Grensgebieten der Medizin und Chirurgie, 10, 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F. (1998). Semantic factors in verb retrieval: An effect of complexity. Brain and Language. 63, 1–31 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broca, P. P. (1861). Perte de la parole, ramollissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau. Bulletin de la Société Anthropologique, 2, 235–238.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, C., Varley, R., Zimmerer, V.C., Carragher, M., Brekelmans, G., & Beeke, S. (2019). “I don’t know”: a usage-based approach to familiar collocations in non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(2), 140–162. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1535692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical Man: Information, Entropy, Language, and Life. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., DeDe, G., & Michaud, J. (2006). Task-independent and task-specific syntactic deficits in aphasic comprehension. Aphasiology, 20(9), 893–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600739273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Futter, C. (1986). Assignment of thematic roles to nouns in sentence comprehension by an agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 27(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90008-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan D, Hildebrandt N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Hildebrandt, N., & Makris, N. (1996). Locations of lesions in stroke patients with deficits in syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Brain, 119 (3), 933–949 https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.3.933.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caplan, D., Michaud, J., & Hufford, R. (2013). Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain and language, 127(1), 21–33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Berndt, R. S., Basili, A. G., & Koller, J. J. (1981). Syntactic Processing Deficits in Aphasia. Cortex, 17(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(81)80021-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1989). The disruption of sentence production: Some dissociations. Brain and Language, 36(4), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)90091-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3(4), 572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A. & Just, M. A. (1994) Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In: Handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. M. Gernsbacher. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., Oaksford, M., Hahn, U., & Heit, E. (2010). Bayesian models of cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 1(6), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornell, T., Fromkin, V., & Mauner, G. (1993). A Linguistic Approach to Language Processing in Broca's Aphasia: A Paradox Resolved. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(2), 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cupples, L., & Inglis, A. L. (1993). When task demands induce “asyntactic” comprehension: A study of sentence interpretation in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(3), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299308253461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. & Wilcox, M. J. (1985). Adult Aphasia Rehabilitation: Applied Pragmatics. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R. D. (1987). From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4(2), 187–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298708252039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, J.-P.-F. (1819). Introduction pratique sur le magnétisme animal, suivie d’une lettre écrite à l’auteur par un médecin étranger, reprinted in 1836. J.-G. Dentu (Paris), in-8°, ii + 472 p.
   Google Scholar
• Devescovi, A., Bates, E., D’amico, S., Hernandez, A., Marangolo, P., Pizzamiglio, L., & Razzano, C. (1997). An on-line study of grammaticality judgements in normal and aphasic speakers of Italian. Aphasiology, 11(6), 543–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039708248490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, F., Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., Utman, J. A., Dronkers, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2001). Language deficits, localization, and grammar: Evidence for a distributive model of language breakdown in aphasic patients and neurologically intact individuals. Psychological Review, 108(4), 759–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, F., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. (2000). The relationship of discourse skills and literacy to syntactic processing ability in students working under normal and stressful conditions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Doedens, W. J., & Meteyard, L. (2020). Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: A critical review. Aphasiology, 34(4), 492–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1702848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, C. J. (2016). Frequency, activation, and the production of verb inflection in agrammatic aphasia. Aphasiology 30(11 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1105357).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. (2010). The Multiple Demand (MD) system of the primate brain: Mental programs for intelligence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14 (4), 172–179 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J., Assem, M., & Shashidara S. (2020). Integrated intelligence from distributed brain activity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.06.012,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A. (2016). A review of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment: Theory, methods, results, and clinical implications. Topics in Language Disorders, 36(2), 123–135 https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Functional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16428–16433 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112937108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Blank, I. A., Siegelman, M., & Mineroff, Z. (2020). Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network. Cognition, 203, 104348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Hsieh, P.-J., Nieto-Castañón, A., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. & Kanwisher, N. (2010). New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 104, 1177–1194 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00032.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E. & Shain, C. (2021). Similarity of computations across domains does not imply shared implementation: The case of language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 30(6), 526–534 https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211046955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C. A., & DeBose, C. E. (1977). Simplified registers, broken language, and pidginization. In Valdman, Albert, ed. Pidgin and Creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana UP. pp. 99–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Ambiguity, Accessibility, and a Division of Labor for Communicative Success. Learning and Motivation, 49, 209–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00006-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., & Hillis, A. E. (2021). Current approaches to the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Stroke, 23(2), 183–201 https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2020.05015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., & Frazier, L. (1992). Thematic analysis in agrammatic comprehension: Syntactic structures and task demands. Brain and Language, 42(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90053-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2006). Speech production in Broca’s agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning. In Y. Grodzinsky, K. Amunts (Eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 63–82 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177640.003.0005). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and Agreement in Agrammatic Production: Pruning the Syntactic Tree. Brain and Language, 56(3), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Greenhouse, J., Pudil, M., Shi, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2021): Enhancing the classification of aphasia: a statistical analysis using connected speech, Aphasiology. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1975636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2000). A usage -based model of aphasic sentence comprehension. University of California, Berkeley ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 9979627.
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2008). “Time” and “thyme” are not homophones: Word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84, 474–496 https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl. S. & Menn, L. (2016). Usage-based approaches to aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1361–1377 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1140120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of memory and language, 66(4), 789–806 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallée, J., Cordella, C., Fedorenko, E., Hochberg, D., Touroutoglou, A., Quimby, M., & Dickerson, B. C. (2021). Breakdowns in Informativeness of Naturalistic Speech Production in Primary Progressive Aphasia. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershman, S. J., Horvitz, E. J., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines. Science, 349(6245), 273–278 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Bergen, L., & Piantadosi, S. T. (2013). Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(20), 8051–8056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216438110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. P., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019). How Efficiency Shapes Human Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Sandberg, C., Fedorenko, E., Bergen, L., & Kiran, S. (2015). A rational inference approach to aphasic language comprehension. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1111994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E., Tan, C., Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B. & Fedorenko, E. (2017). Don’t underestimate the benefits of being misunderstood. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617690277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., & Ferreira, F. (2022). Good-enough language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(4), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and language disturbances. Grune & Stratton, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H. (1976). Agrammatism. In H. A. Whitaker (Ed.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H. (1997). Agrammatism in aphasiology. Clinical Neuroscience (New York, N.Y.), 4(2), 51–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Blumstein, S. E., Gleason, J. B., Hyde, M. R., Green, E., & Statlender. S. (1979) The effect of syntactic encoding on sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 7, 201–269 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(79)90017-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Gleason, J. B., Bernholtz, N. A., & Hyde, M. R. (1972). Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca’s aphasic. Cortex, 8(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(72)80018-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Gleason, J. B., & Hyde, M. R. (1970). Some Dimensions of Auditory Language Comprehension in Aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(3), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1303.595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Menn, L. (1985). Is Agrammatism a Unitary Phenomenon?**The writing of this chapter and the authors’ cited research were supported in part by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration, and in part by USPHS Grants NS06209 and NS07615. In M.-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 1–26). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50005-5
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Bonawitz, E. (2015). Bayesian models of child development. WIREs Cognitive Science, 6(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. & Dell, G. S. (2003). Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science, 27, 1–40 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2701_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004). Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 55(3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G. (1984). Communication in aphasia therapy: some of the procedures and issues involved. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 19, 35–46 https://doi.org/10.3109/13682828409019834.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010). Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2009). Theory-based causal induction induction. Psychological Review, 116(4), 661–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27, 135–159 . doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90009-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995a). Trace Deletion, theta-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469–497. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995b). A restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50, 26–51 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, F. G. (2009). A New Look at the Classical Entropy of Written English. ArXiv:0911.2284 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2284
   Google Scholar
• Haith, A.M., & Krakauer, J.W. (2013). Richardson, Michael, Riley, Michael, Shockley, Kevin (eds) Progress in Motor Control. 782 Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology , 1–21 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5465-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2001). A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model. Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. NAACL 2001. https://doi.org/10.3115/1073336.1073357
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. (1969). Options and functions in the English clause. Brno Studies in English, 8, 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language, 62(2), 221–254. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1905
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C. (1985). Agrammatism versus Paragrammatism: A Fictitious Opposition. In M.-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50012-2
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C. (1985). Agrammatism versus Paragrammatism: A Fictitious Opposition. In M.-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50012-2
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, K. (1906). Isolierte apraktische agraphia. Munchen Med. Wchnschr., 39.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1976). The Nature of Comprehension Errors in Broca’s, Conduction and Wernicke’s Aphasics. Cortex, 12(3), 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80007-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Avrutin, S. (1995). Representation, Referentiality, and Processing in Agrammatic Comprehension: Two Case Studies. Brain and Language, 50(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, N. (1986). A linguistically-based parsing analysis of aphasics’ comprehension of referential dependencies. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, N., Caplan, D., & Evans, K. (1987). The mani left ti without a trace: A case study of aphasic processing of empty categories. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4(3), 257–302 https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298708252040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., Heidler-Gary, J., Newhart, M., Chang, S., Ken, L., and Bak, T. H. (2006). Naming and comprehension in primary progressive aphasia: the influence of grammatical word class. Aphasiology 20, 246–256. doi: 10.1080/02687030500473262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, B. T. M. (1992). Agrammatic Speech in Broca’s Aphasia: Strategic Choice for the Elliptical Register. Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University of Nijmegen [available as NICI Technical Report 92-07].
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1980). Communicative Abilities of Daily Living (CADL). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1991). Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6(2), 197–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(91)90007-6.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (2021). The value of “communication strategies” in the treatment of aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(7), 984–994 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1752908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Patterson, K., Franklin, S., Orchard-lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985). The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298508252861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isserlin, M. (1922). Ueber Agrammatismus. Zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Neurologic Und Psychiatric, 75, 332–410.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1956). Fundamentals of Language. Mouton, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1964). Disorders of Language. Churchill, London.
   Google Scholar
• Josephy-Hernandez, S., Rezaii, N., Jones, A., Hochberg, D., Quimby, M., Wong, B., & Dickerson, B. (2022). Automated analysis of written language in the three variants of primary progressive aphasia. medRxiv 2022.07.24.22277977; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.24.22277977
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science, 20, 137–194 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2002_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12, 816–830 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean, M.-L. (1977). The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca’s aphasia, an example. Cognition, 5(1), 9–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(77)90015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean, M.-L. (1979). Agrammatism: A Phonological Deficit? Cognition, 7(1), 69–83 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(79)90012-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean, M. L. (1985). Agrammatism. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kean, M.-L. (2013). Agrammatism. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keshev, M., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2021). Noisy is better than rare: Comprehenders compromise subject-verb agreement to form more probable linguistic structures. Cognitive Psychology, 124, 101359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killmer, H., Svennevig, J., & Beeke, S. (2022). Joint planning in conversations with a person with aphasia. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 72–89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleist, K. (1916). Die leitungsaphasie und grammatische Störungen. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 40, 118–199.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, D., & Richards, W. (1996). Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge University Press :https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511984037.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., Lorch, M. P., Pearson, D. M. (1989), Verb finding in aphasia. Cortex 25, 57–69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(89)80006-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. (1987). A Theory of Grammatical Impairment in Aphasia. In G. Kempen (Ed.), Natural Language Generation: New Results in Artificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics (pp. 377–391). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3645-4_24
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. (2001) “Does agrammatic speech constitute a regression to child language? A three-way comparison between agrammatic, child and normal ellipsis”. Brain and Language, 77(3), 340–351 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J. (2006). How language adapts to the brain. In L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E Casielles, & en E. Barton (Eds.), The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 229–258).
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., Grunsven, J. F. van & Keyser, A. (1985). On parallelism between production and comprehension in agrammatism. In M.-L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism (pp. 207–248). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402830-2.50011-0
   Google Scholar
• Kolk, H., & Heeschen, C. (1990). Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 4(3), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039008249075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H., & Heeschen, C. (1992). Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7(2), 89–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969208409381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., & Van Grunsven, M. M. F. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(4), 347–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298508252666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körding, K.P., Beierholm, U., Ma, W.J., Quartz, S., Tenenbaum, J.B., & Shams, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2(9), e943. doi:9 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowski, K. (1981). A contrastive analysis of the comprehension deficit in posterior and anterior aphasia. Brown University. Unpublished Master’s Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. The Chicago University Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008a). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008b). A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 234–243.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086–21090. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907664106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, P. (1963). Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Lang Speech, 6, 172–187 https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096300600306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieder, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2020). Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900061X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger, M. C., Schwarz, M., & Saffran, E. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics. Cognition, 13, 361–392 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(83)90015-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ryskin, R., Futrell, R. & Gibson, E. (2020). Structural Frequency Effects in Noisy-channel Comprehension. Presentation at the Penn Linguistics Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A.R. (1964). Factors and forms of aphasia. De Reuck, M O’Connor (Eds.), Disorders of Language, CIBA Foundation Symposium, Churchill, London.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A.R. (1970). Traumatic Aphasia. The Hague, Mouton https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816297.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Osmán-Sági, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1991). Sentence comprehension in aphasia in two clear case-marking languages. Brain and Language, 41, 234–249. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90154-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahowald, K., Diachek, E., Gibson, E., Fedorenko, E., & Futrell, R. (2022). Grammatical cues are largely, but not completely, redundant with word meanings in natural language. ArXiv:2201.12911 [ Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.12911
   Google Scholar
• Manochiopinig, S., C. Sheard and V. Reed 1992 Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia: a clinical review. Aphasiology, 6, 519–533 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039208249489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mårdh, I. (1980). Headlinese: On the grammar of English front-page headlines. Volume 58 of Lund studies in English, ISSN 0076-1451. Liberläromedel/Gleerup.
   Google Scholar
• Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. A., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45(3), 340–370. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L. (2009). Child Language, Aphasia, and General Psycholinguistics. In Guo, J. & Lieven, E., Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 375–388 https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837887.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, L. & Bastiaanse, R. 2016. Beyond Chomsky versus Skinner: Frequency, Language Processing, and Aphasia. Aphasiology 30:11, 1361–1377 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1168920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., Obler, L. K., & Miceli, M. (1990). Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-language Narrative Sourcebook. John Benjamins Publishing https://doi.org/10.1075/z.39.
   Google Scholar
• Mesulam, M. &., & Marsel. (2001). Primary progressive aphasia. Ann Neurol., 49(4), 425–432 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.91 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L., & Goodglass, H. (1983). Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language, 19(1), 65–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90056-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20(2), 207–220 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(84)80038-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., & Berndt, R. S. (1995). Treatment of thematic mapping in sentence comprehension: Implications for normal processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 503–547 https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299508252006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(6), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monakow, C. von (1914). Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn. Verlag von J.F. Bergmann.
   Google Scholar
• Nathaniel, S., Ryskin, R., & Gibson, E. (2018 March). The Effect of Context on Noisy-Channel Sentence Comprehension. 31st Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J.-L., Dordain, M., Perron, C., Ska, B., Bub, D., Caplan, D., Mehler, J., & Lecours, A. R. (1988). Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: Reduced availability of syntactic structures and/or of grammatical morphemes? A case study. Brain and Language, 33(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(88)90069-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E. B., &., and Waugh, N. C. (1960). The redundancy of texts in three languages. Information and control, 3, 141–153 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(60)90731-2.
   Google Scholar
• Nubold, P., & Turner, M. (1987). Death is the mother of beauty: Mind, metaphor, criticism. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, D. (1987). Grammatical disturbances of speech production. In M. Coltheart, R. Job, & G. Sartori (Eds.), The cognitive neuropsychology of language. London: Erlbaum https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832807.
   Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2011). Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012551108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick A. (1898). Beiträge zur pathologie und pathologischen anatomie des centralnervensystems. Mit bemerkungen zur normalen. Berlin: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• Pick, A. (1931/1973). Aphasia. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Pitres, A. (1898). L’aphasie amnésique et ses variétés cliniques. Paris: Alcar.
   Google Scholar
• Poliak, M., Ryskin, R., Braginsky, M. & Gibson, E. (2022) Properties of the noise model during language comprehension: evidence from Russian. Poster presented at the 35th annual Human Sentence Processing conference, UC Santa Cruz.
   Google Scholar
• Poppels, T., & Levy, R. P. (2016). Structure-sensitive Noise Inference: Comprehenders Expect Exchange Errors. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rescorla M. (2021). Bayesian modeling of the mind: From norms to neurons. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. Jan;12(1):e1540. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1540. Epub 2020 Aug 15. PMID: 33237603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaii, N., Mahowald, K., Ryskin, R., Dickerson, D. & Gibson, E. (2022). A syntax–lexicon trade-off in language production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(25), e2120203119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2120203119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochon, E., Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Quantitative analysis of aphasic sentence production: Further development and new data. Brain and Language, 72, 193–218 https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryskin, R., Futrell, R., Kiran, S., & Gibson, E. (2018). Comprehenders model the nature of noise in the environment. Cognition, 181, 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryskin, R., Gibson, E., & Kiran, S. (2019). Noisy-channel sentence comprehension in aphasia: The role of noise in the context. Poster presented at the 32nd annual Human Sentence Processing conference.
   Google Scholar
• Ryskin, R., Stearns, L., Bergen, L., Eddy, M., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2021). An ERP index of real-time error correction within a noisy-channel framework of human communication. Neuropsychologia, 158, 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., & Martin, N. (1990). Effects of syntactic priming on sentence production in an agrammatic aphasic. In 28th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., & Linebarger, M. C. (1998). Semantic Influences on Thematic Role Assignment: Evidence from Normals and Aphasics. Brain and Language, 62(2), 255–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1918
   Google Scholar
• Saffran EM, Schwartz MF, Marin OSM. The word order problem in agrammatism: II. Production. Brain and Language. 1980;10:263–280 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90056-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, E. (1914). Motorische Aphasie mit Agrammatismus und sensorich-agrammatischen Störungen. Monatschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie, 35, 181–275.
   Google Scholar
• Sarno, M.T. (1969). Functional Communication Profile: A manual of directions. ( Rehabilitation Monograph 42). New York: NYU Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism, I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shain, C., Blank, I., van Schijndel, M., Schuler, W., & Fedorenko, E. (2020). FMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307
   Google Scholar
• Shain, C., Blank, I. A., Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Schuler, W. (2022). Robust effects of working memory demand during naturalistic language comprehension in language-selective cortex (p. 2021.09.18.460917). Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.18.460917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Gorrell, P., & Tuller, B. (1989). Reception of language in Broca’s aphasia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406355
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1951). Prediction and Entropy of Printed English. Bell System Technical Journal, 30(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1951.tb01366.x
   Google Scholar
• Steinthal, H. (1871). Abriss der Sprachwissenschaft: Einleitung in die Psychologie und Sprachwissenschaft. Dümmler.
   Google Scholar
• Tal, S., & Arnon, I. (2022). Redundancy can benefit learning: Evidence from word order and case marking. Cognition, 224, 105055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissot R.J., Mounin G., Lhermitte F. (1973). L’agrammatisme. Dessart; Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J. (2014). Trends in syntactic parsing: Anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 605–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetkova, L. S., & Glozman, J. M. (1975). A Neurolinguistic Analysis of Expressive Agrammatism in Different Forms of Aphasia. Linguistics, 154/155, 60–76 https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1975.13.154-155.61.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062784.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, D. (2001). Is your syntactic component really necessary. Aphasiology, 15(4), 343–406 https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040042000287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R. A., Klessinger, N. J., Romanowski, C. A., & Siegal, M. (2005). Agrammatic but numerate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(9), 3519–3524.
   Google Scholar
• Volkmer, A., Spector, A., Meitanis, V., Warren, J. D., & Beeke, S. (2020). Effects of functional communication interventions for people with primary progressive aphasia and their caregivers: A systematic review. Aging & Mental Health, 24(9), 1381–1393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1617246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, T., Dickey, M. W., & Liburd, T. L. (2017). A rational inference approach to group and individual-level sentence comprehension performance in aphasia. Cortex, 92, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience, 5 (6), 598–604 https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0602-858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., Entrup, J. L., Schneck, S. M., Onuscheck, C. F., Levy, D. F., Rahman, M., … & Kirshner, H. S. (2022). Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. Brain https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac129.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M., & Saygın, A. P. (2004). Grammaticality Judgment in Aphasia: Deficits Are Not Specific to Syntactic Structures, Aphasic Syndromes, or Lesion Sites. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904322984535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, D. M. (2007). Probabilistic models in human sensorimotor control. Human Movement Science, 26(4), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B. B. (1988). Grammaticality Judgments and Sentence Comprehension in Agrammatic Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 31(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3101.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., & Bates, E. (1991). Differential Sensitivity to Errors of Agreement and Word Order in Broca’s Aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(3), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1991.3.3.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, M., Levy, R., & Gibson, E. (2017March). Rational inference and sentence interpretation in Mandarin Chinese. 30th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Hardy, C. J., Eastman, J., Dutta, S., Varnet, L., Bond, R. L., … & Varley, R. A. (2020). Automated profiling of spontaneous speech in primary progressive aphasia and behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia: an approach based on usage-frequency. Cortex, 133, 103–119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingeser LB, Berndt RS. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language. 1990;39:14–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90002-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurif, E. B., Caramazza, A., & Myerson, R. (1972). Grammatical judgments of agrammatic aphasics. Neuropsychologia, 10(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(72)90003-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An On-Line Analysis of Syntactic Processing in Broca′s and Wernicke′s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 45(3), 448–464. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1993.1054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar