Will stumps from forest thinning and other standing deadwood provide habitat for saproxylic beetles if felling stumps on clearcuts are harvested?

References

• Abrahamsson M, Lindbladh M. 2006. A comparison of saproxylic beetle occurrence between man-made high- and low-stumps of spruce (Picea abies). For Ecol Manag. 226(1–3):230–237. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous 2016. Bioenergi från skog och skogsindustri [Bioenergy from forests and forest industry]. Report from Pöyry Management Consulting. https://www.skogsindustrierna.se/siteassets/dokument/rapporter/bioenergi-fran-skog-och-skogsindustri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Lassauce A, Jonsell M. 2012. Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity— a review focused on the situation in Europe1 this article is one of a selection of papers from the international symposium on dynamics and ecological services of deadwood in forest ecosystems. Can J For Res. 42(8):1421–1432. doi:10.1139/x2012-078.
   Google Scholar
• Burner RC, et al. 2021. Choosy beetles: how host trees and southern boreal forest naturalness may determine dead wood beetle communities. For Ecol Manag. 487:119023. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruso A, Rudolphi J, Thor G. 2008. Lichen species diversity and substrate amounts in young planted boreal forests: a comparison between slash and stumps of Picea abies. Biol Conserv. 141(1):47–55. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg A, et al. 2011. Modelled impact of Norway spruce logging residue extraction on biodiversity in Sweden. Can J For Res. 41(6):1220–1232. doi:10.1139/x11-034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg A, Stokland JN. 2004. Vedlevande arters krav på substrat - sammentällning och analys av 3600 arter’, Skogsstyrelsen Rapport, pp. 1–75.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong J, Dahlberg A. 2017. Impact on species of conservation interest of forest harvesting for bioenergy purposes. Forest Ecology and Management. 383:37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnell G, et al. 2007. Miljökonsekvenser av stubbskörd – en sammanställning av kunskap och kunskapsbehov’.
   Google Scholar
• Egnell, G. (2013) ‘Skogsbränsle’, Skogsskötselserien, (17), pp. 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ekholm A, et al. 2023. Long-term yield and biodiversity in stands managed with the selection system and the rotation forestry system: a qualitative review. For Ecol Manag. 537:120920. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esseen P. -A., Ehnström B., Ericsson L., Sjöberg K. 1997. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins. 46:16–47.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman J, Walheim M. 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. For Ecol Manag. 131(1–3):23–36. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00208-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf M, et al. 2022. Saproxylic beetles trace deadwood and differentiate between deadwood niches before their arrival on potential hosts. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 15(1):48–60. doi:10.1111/icad.12534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Perhans K. 2010. Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach. Ambio. 39(8):546–554. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0071-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen V. 1964. Fortegnelse over Danmarks biller 1. og 2. del’. Ent Meddr. 33:1–507.
   Google Scholar
• Hautala H, et al. 2004. Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland. Biodivers Conserv. 13(8):1541–1554. doi:10.1023/B:BIOC.0000021327.43783.a9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiron M, et al. 2017. Consequences of bioenergy wood extraction for landscape-level availability of habitat for dead wood-dependent organisms. J Environ Manag. 198:33–42. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjältén J, Stenbacka F, Andersson J. 2010. Saproxylic beetle assemblages on low stumps, high stumps and logs: implications for environmental effects of stump harvesting. For Ecol Manag. 260(7):1149–1155. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P. 2009. Prescribed fires and retention trees help to conserve beetle diversity in managed boreal forests despite their transient negative effects on some beetle groups. Insect Conserv Divers. 2(2):93–105. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00048.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson T, et al. 2007. Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: implications for conservation strategies. For Ecol Manag. 242(2–3):496–510. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Hansson J. 2011. Logs and stumps in clearcuts support similar saproxylic beetle diversity: implications for bioenergy harvest. Silva Fenn. 45(5):1053–1064. doi:10.14214/sf.86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Nittérus K, Stighäll K. 2004. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biol Conserv. 118(2):163–173. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Schroeder M. 2014. Proportions of saproxylic beetle populations that utilise clear-cut stumps in a boreal landscape – biodiversity implications for stump harvest. For Ecol Manag. 334:313–320. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Weslien J. 2003. Felled or standing retained wood—it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For Ecol Manag. 175(1–3):425–435. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00143-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Weslien J, Ehnström B. 1998. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers Conserv. 7(6):749–764. doi:10.1023/A:1008888319031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein J, Low M, Sjögren J, Eggers S. 2022. Short-term experimental support for bird diversity retention measures during thinning in European boreal forests. For Ecol Manag. 509:120084. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch K. 1992. Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Ökologie. Band 1-3. Krefeld: Goecke & Evers.
   Google Scholar
• Kouki J, et al. 2001. Forest fragmentation in Fennoscandia: linking habitat requirements of wood-associated threatened species to landscape and habitat changes. Scand J For Res. 16(sup003):27–37. doi:10.1080/028275801300090564.
   Google Scholar
• Lassauce A, Lieutier F, Bouget C. 2012. Woodfuel harvesting and biodiversity conservation in temperate forests: effects of logging residue characteristics on saproxylic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv. 147(1):204–212. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekander B., Bejer-Petersen B., Kangas E., Bakke A. 1977. The distribution of bark beetles in the Nordic countries. Acta Entomologica Fennica. 32:1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lettenmaier L, et al. 2022. Beetle diversity is higher in sunny forests due to higher microclimatic heterogeneity in deadwood. Oecologia. 198(3):825–834. doi:10.1007/s00442-022-05141-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhe A, Lindelöw Å, Åsenblad N. 2005. Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers Conserv. 14(12):3033–3053. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0314-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbl I, Smetana A. 2003–2012. Catalogue of palearctic coleoptera, Vol 1-8. Stenstrup, Denmark: Apollo Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mason WL, et al. 2022. Continuous cover forestry in Europe: usage and the knowledge gaps and challenges to wider adoption. For: Int J For Res. 95(1):1–12. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpab038.
   Google Scholar
• McGeoch MA, et al. 2007. Saproxylic beetle diversity in a managed boreal forest: importance of stand characteristics and forestry conservation measures. Divers Distrib. 13(4):418–429. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00350.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mönkkönen M, et al. 2014. Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. J Environ Manag. 134:80–89. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.12.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller J, et al. 2020. Primary determinants of communities in deadwood vary among taxa but are regionally consistent. Oikos. 129(10):1579–1588. doi:10.1111/oik.07335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklasson M, Drakenberg B. 2001. A 600-year tree-ring fire history from Norra Kvills National Park, southern Sweden: implications for conservation strategies in the hemiboreal zone. Biol Conserv. 101(1):63–71. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00050-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklasson M, Granström A. 2000. Numbers and sizes of fires: long-term spatially explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology. 81(6):1484–1499. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1484:NASOFL]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J. 2017. ‘Vegan: ecological diversity’, R Package Version 2.4-4, p. 11. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan.
   Google Scholar
• Östlund L, Zackrisson O, Axelsson AL. 1997. The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Can J For Res. 27(8):1198–1206. doi:10.1139/x97-070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm T. 1959. Die Holz- und Rindenkäfer der süd- und mittelschwedischen Laubbäume. Opusc Ent Suppl 16:1–374.
   Google Scholar
• Peura M, et al. 2018. Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia. Biol Conserv. 217:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranius T., Hämälainen A., Egnell G., Olsson B., Eklöf K., Stendahl J., Rudolphi J., Stens A., Felton A. 2018. The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystemservices and biodiversity: A synthesis. Journal of Environmental Management. 209:409–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolphi J, Gustafsson L. 2005. Effects of forest-fuel harvesting on the amount of deadwood on clear-cuts. Scand J For Res. 20(3):235–242. doi:10.1080/02827580510036201.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder LM, et al. 2006. Recruitment of saproxylic beetles in high stumps created for maintaining biodiversity in a boreal forest landscape. Can J For Res. 36(9):2168–2178. doi:10.1139/x06-119.
   Google Scholar
• Seibold S, et al. 2023. Drivers of community assembly change during succession in wood-decomposing beetle communities. J Anim Ecol. 92(5):965–978. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen J, et al. 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. For Ecol Manag. 128(3):211–225. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00148-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen J. 2001. Oikos editorial forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull. 49:11–41.
   Google Scholar
• Siitonen J, Saaristo L. 2000. Habitat requirements and conservation of Pytho kolwensis, a beetle species of old-growth boreal forest. Biol Conserv. 94(2):211–220. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00174-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson B. 2013. Biodiversity in dead wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2009. Handbok - Stubbskörd, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2023. Hyggesfritt skogsbruk, Swedish Forest Agency. Available at: https://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/bruka-skog/olika-satt-att-skota-din-skog/hyggesfritt-skogsbruk/ (Accessed: 12 June 2023).
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. 2015. Forests and Forestry in Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Toivanen T, et al. 2012. The effect of forest fuel harvesting on the fungal diversity of clear-cuts. Biomass Bioenergy. 39:84–93. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen T, Kotiaho JS. 2010. The preferences of saproxylic beetle species for different dead wood types created in forest restoration treatments. Can J For Res. 40(3):445–464. doi:10.1139/X09-205.
   Google Scholar
• Uhl B, et al. 2022. Snags, logs, stumps, and microclimate as tools optimizing deadwood enrichment for forest biodiversity. Biol Conserv. 270:109569. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorsson J, Jonsell M. 2013. Effects of stump extraction on saproxylic beetle diversity in Swedish clear-cuts. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 6(4):483–493. doi:10.1111/icad.12005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel S, et al. 2020. Optimizing enrichment of deadwood for biodiversity by varying sun exposure and tree species: An experimental approach. J Appl Ecol. 57(10):2075–2085. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley JD, Godbold DL. 2010. Stump harvesting for bioenergy – a review of the environmental impacts. Forestry. 83(1):17–38. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpp028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikars LO, Sahlin E, Ranius T. 2005. A comparison of three methods to estimate species richness of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in logs and high stumps of Norway spruce. Can Entomol. 137(3):304–324. doi:10.4039/n04-104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolotarjova V, Kraut A, Lõhmus A. 2016. Slash harvesting does not undermine beetle diversity on small clear-cuts containing sufficient legacies. J Insect Conserv. 20(2):285–294. doi:10.1007/s10841-016-9865-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar