Local passion and national apathy: investigating the phenomenon of selective voting behaviour

References

• Azur, M. J., E. A. Stuart, C. Frangakis, and P. J. Leaf. 2011. “Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations: What is it and How Does it Work?” International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 20 (1): 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, M., C. Jensen, P. B. Mortensen, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Local News Media and Voter Turnout.” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.834253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balch, G. I. 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept Sense of Political Efficacy.” Political Methodology 1 (2): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. 2012. “Individuální charakteristiky kandidátů ve volbách do zastupitelstev obcí a jejich vliv na volební výsledky.” Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 48 (4): 613–640. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2012.48.4.05.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, J. 2018. “Rural Quality of Life–Poverty, Satisfaction and Opportunity Deprivation in Different Types of Rural Territories.” European Countryside 10 (2): 191–209. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., J. O. Dahlgaard, J. H. Hansen, and K. M. Hansen. 2019. “Core and Peripheral Voters: Predictors of Turnout Across Three Types of Elections.” Political Studies 67 (2): 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718766246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, USA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breux, S., J. Couture, and N. Goodman. 2017. “Fewer Voters, Higher Stakes? The Applicability of Rational Choice for Voter Turnout in Quebec Municipalities.” Environment & Planning C Politics & Space 35 (6): 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., G. Gurin, and W. E. Miller. 1954. The voter decides. New York: Row, Pererson & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42:264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. S. 2016. “All the Same? Examining the Link Between Three Kinds of Political Dissatisfaction and Protest.” Comparative European Politics 14 (6): 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., R. G. Niemi, and G. E. Silver. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992337.
   Google Scholar
• CVVM. 2023. “Czech Public Attitudes to Foreigners.” https://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/en/press-releases/political/politicians-political-institutions/5675-czech-publics-attitudes-to-foreigners-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dehdari, S. H., J. Meriläinen, and S. Oskarsson. 2021. “Selective Abstention in Simultaneous Elections: Understanding the Turnout Gap.” Electoral Studies 71:102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B. 2002. “Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 793–812. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dodeigne, J., M. Reuchamps, K. Steyvers, and F. Teuber. 2022. “Local Voters Have Their Reasons. Mapping Voting Motives in Local Elections in Belgium.” Swiss Political Science Review 28 (4): 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• François, A., and O. Gergaud. 2019. “Is Civic Duty the Solution to the Paradox of Voting?” Public Choice 180 (3–4): 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-018-00635-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine 27 (15): 2865–2873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendzwill, A. 2021. “Local Autonomy and National–Local Turnout Gap: Higher Stakes, Higher Turnout?” Regional & Federal Studies 31 (4): 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2019.1706496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendźwiłł, A., and U. Kjaer. 2021. “Mind the Gap, Please! Pinpointing the Influence of Municipal Size on Local Electoral Participation.” Local Government Studies 47 (1): 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1777107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurkink, B., A. Zaslove, R. Sluiter, and K. Jacobs. 2020. “Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles?” Political Studies 68 (1): 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719842768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Górecki, M. A., and A. Gendźwiłł. 2021. “Polity Size and Voter Turnout Revisited: Micro-Level Evidence from 14 Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Local Government Studies 47 (1): 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1787165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlepas, N., N. Kersting, S. Kuhlman, P. Swianiewicz, and F. Teles, ed. 2018. Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe: Decentralization Beyond the Municipal Tier. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. M., and A. C. Weinschenk. 2014. “Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913494018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersting, N., and A. Vetter, ed. 2003. Reforming Local Government in Europe. Wiesbaden, DE: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U. 2007. “The Decreasing Number of Candidates at Danish Local Elections: Local Democracy in Crisis?” Local Government Studies 33 (2): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701198599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U., and K. Steyvers. 2019. “Second Thoughts on Second-Order? Towards a Second-Tier Model of Local Government Elections and Voting.” In The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government, edited by R. Kerley, J. Liddle, and P. T. Dunning, 405–417. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D. 2022. “MIMRGNS: Stata Module to Run Margins after mi Estimate” Statistical Software Components S457795. Boston College Department of Economics. Accessed July 25, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelecký, T. 2007. “Political Parties and Their Role in Local Politics in the Post-Communist Czech Republic.” In Local Government Reforms in Countries in Transition, edited by F. Lazin, M. Evans, V. Hoffmann-Martinot, and H. Wollmann, 121–139. Lanham, USA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kouba, K., and J. Lysek. 2023. “The Return of Silent Elections: Democracy, Uncontested Elections, and Citizen Participation in Czechia.” Democratization 30 (8): 1527–1551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2246148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouba, K., J. Novák, and M. Strnad. 2021. “Explaining Voter Turnout in Local Elections: a Global Comparative Perspective.” Contemporary Politics 27 (1): 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1831764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappie, J., and M. Marschall. 2018. “Place and Participation in Local Elections.” Political Geography 64:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., and P. Van Aelst. 2014. “First-Order, Second-Order or Third-Rate? A Comparison of Turnout in European, Local and National Elections in the Netherlands.” Electoral Studies 35:159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. T., and A. Meng. 2024. “What We Do and Do Not Know About Democratic Backsliding.” PS: Political Science & Politics 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523001038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S., and J. Freese. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. Texas, USA: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lysek, J. 2018. “The “Little Town-Halls” in the Czech Republic: An Unexploited Potential of Functional Decentralization.” In Sub-Municipal Governance in Europe, edited by N. Hlepas, N. Kersting, S. Kuhlman, P. Swianiewicz, and F. Teles, 41–68. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maškarinec, P. 2022. “Mapping the Territorial Distribution of Voter Turnout in Czech Local Elections (1994–2018) Spatial Dimensions of Electoral Participation.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 55 (3): 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1525/cpcs.2022.1706946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal Vs. National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/2149943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. H., and T. S. Robertson. 1972. “Dimensions of Opinion Leadership.” Journal of Marketing Research 9 (1): 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377200900109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., C. Stephen, F. M. Craig, and F. Mattei. 1991. “Measuring Internal Political Efficiency in the 1988 National Election Study.” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1407–1413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietryka, M. T., and D. A. DeBats. 2017. “It’s Not Just What You Have, but Who You Know: Networks, Social Proximity to Elites, and Voting in State and Local Elections.” The American Political Science Review 111 (2): 360–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1992. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., M. Temple, and M. Thrasher. 1996. “Participation in Local Elections.” In Local Democracy and Local Government. Government Beyond the Centre, edited by L. Pratchett and D. Wilson, 62–83. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2005. “Not All ‘Second-Order’ Contests are the Same: Turnout and Party Choice at the Concurrent 2004 Local and European Parliament Elections in England.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (4): 584–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00207.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., and M. Thrasher. 2007. “The Turnout ‘Gap’ and the Costs of Voting – A Comparison of Participation at the 2001 General and 2002 Local Elections in England.” Public Choice 131 (3–4): 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9118-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H., and P. C. Ordeshook. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1953324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, S. J., and J. M. Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ryšavý, D., and J. Bernard. 2013. “Size and Local Democracy: The Case of Czech Municipal Representatives.” Local Government Studies 39 (6): 833–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2012.675329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šaradín, P., T. Lebeda, J. Lysek, M. Soukop, D. Ostrá, and E. Lebedová. 2021. “Post-Election Survey Data: Local Democracy and the 2018 Local Elections in the Czech Republic.” Data in Brief 36:107039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., and C. Jeffery. 2013. “Are Regional Elections Really ‘Second-Order’ Elections?” Regional Studies 47 (3): 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.690069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciarini, P., F. Cappelletti, A. C. Goldberg, and S. Lanz. 2015. “The Underexplored Species: Selective Participation in Direct Democratic Votes.” Swiss Political Science Review 22 (1): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selb, P., and S. Munzert. 2013. “Voter Overrepresentation, Vote Misreporting, and Turnout Bias in Postelection Surveys.” Electoral Studies 32 (1): 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Školník, M., and M. Haman. 2020. “Socioeconomic or Political Variables? The Determinants of Voter Turnout in Czech Municipalities.” Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review 52 (3): 222–244. https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2020.52.3.10.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, K., and C. van Ham. 2013. “The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout.” Electoral Studies 32 (2): 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P., ed. 2002. Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: LGI - Open Society Institute.
   Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voda, P., P. Svačinová, A. Smolková, and S. Balík. 2017. “Local and More Local: Impact of Size and Organization Type of Settlement Units on Candidacy.” Political Geography 59:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, R. E., and S. J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar