776
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher professional autonomy in an atypical government school: matters of relationality and context

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1‐2), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1562.2005.00611.x
  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
  • Biesta, G. (2017). Education, measurement and the professions: Reclaiming a space for democratic professionality in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665
  • Braun, A., Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Taking context seriously: Towards explaining policy enactments in the secondary school. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601555
  • Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544
  • Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Towards a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480902998421
  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
  • Day, C. (2020). How teachers’ individual autonomy may hinder students’ academic progress and attainment: Professionalism in practice. British Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3577
  • Day, C., & Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well‐being and effectiveness: The emotional contexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 16(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360701877743
  • Fitzgerald, S., McGrath-Champ, S., Stacey, M., Wilson, R., & Gavin, M. (2019). Intensification of teachers’ work under devolution: A ‘tsunami’of paperwork. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(5), 613–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618801396
  • Forsey, M. (2010). Teachers and the re-production of middle‐class culture in Australian schools. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 20(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620211003655671
  • Frostenson, M. (2015). Three forms of professional autonomy: De-professionalisation of teachers in a new light. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 28464. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28464
  • Gewirtz, S. (2002). The managerial school: Post-welfarism and social justice in education. Routledge.
  • Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., & Cribb, A., Gewirtz, S., Mahony, P., Hextall, I., Cribb, A. (2009). Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887264
  • Gunter, H. M. (2011). The state and education policy: The academies programme. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Heffernan, A., Bright, D., Kim, M., Longmuir, F., & Magyar, B. (2022). ‘I cannot sustain the workload and the emotional toll’: Reasons behind Australian teachers’ intentions to leave the profession. Australian Journal of Education, 66(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441221086654
  • Hextall, I., & Mahony, P. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. Routledge.
  • Holloway, J., & Brass, J. (2018). Making accountable teachers: The terrors and pleasures of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 33(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work. Power and accountability in America’s schools. Harvard University Press.
  • Keddie, A. (2013). Thriving amid the performative demands of the contemporary audit culture: A matter of school context. Journal of Education Policy, 28(6), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.768706
  • Keddie, A. (2017). Primary school leadership in England: Performativity and matters of professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1273758
  • Keddie, A., Blackmore, J., & MacDonald, K. (2022). ‘It’s like we’re in two different schools’: Contrasting stories of teacher and leader autonomy within a distributed approach to leadership. Educational Management & Leadership, 174114322211260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221126001
  • Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0041-9
  • National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007. (2018). The national health and medical research council, the Australian research council and universities Australia. Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Paradis, A., Lutovac, S., Jokikokko, K., & Kaasila, R. (2019). Towards a relational understanding of teacher autonomy: The role of trust for Canadian and Finnish teachers. Research in Comparative & International Education, 14(3), 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919864252
  • Parding, K., McGrath-Champ, S., & Stacey, M. (2017). Teachers, school choice and competition: Lock-in effects within and between sectors. Policy Futures in Education, 15(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316688355
  • Riley, P., See, S. M., Marsh, H., & Dicke, T. (2021). The Australian principal occupational health, safety and wellbeing survey 2020 data. Australian Catholic University.
  • Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930116819
  • Salokangas, M., & Wermke, W. (2016). What do we know about teacher autonomy? A review of international literature [Paper presented at the ECER 2016 leading education]. The Distinct Contributions of Educational Research and Researchers.
  • Smyth, J. (2011). The disaster of the ‘self‐managing school’ – Genesis, trajectory, undisclosed agenda, and effects. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(2), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2011.560253
  • Wermke, W., & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
  • Wermke, W., Olason Rick, S., & Salokangas, M. (2019). Decision-making and control: Perceived autonomy of teachers in Germany and Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482960