Principal job satisfaction, distributed leadership, teacher-student relationships, and student achievement in Turkey: a multilevel mediated-effect model

References

• Anderman, L. H. 2003. “Academic and Social Perceptions as Predictors of Change in Middle School Students’ Sense of School Belonging.” The Journal of Experimental Education 72 (1): 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., and S. Gümüş. 2021. “The Effect of Learning-Centred Leadership and Teacher Trust on Teacher Professional Learning: Evidence from a Centralised Education System.” Professional Development in Education. doi:10.1080/19415257.2021.1879234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., S. Gümüş, and Y. Liu. 2021. “Does School Leadership Matter for Teachers’ Classroom Practice? The Influence of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Instructional Quality.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 32 (3): 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellibas, M. Ş., and Y. Liu. 2018. “The Effects of Principals’ Perceived Instructional and Distributed Leadership Practices on their Perceptions of School Climate.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 21 (2): 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, R., H. Moore, R. A. Astor, and R. Benbenishty. 2017. “A Research Synthesis of the Associations Between Socio-Economic Background, Inequality, School Climate, and Academic Achievement.” Review of Educational Research 87 (2): 425–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. 1980. Attachment and Loss: Loss, Sadness, and Depression. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, I. H. 2011. “A Study of the Relationships between Distributed Leadership, Teacher Academic Optimism and Student Achievement in Taiwanese Elementary Schools.” School Leadership & Management 31 (5): 491–515.
   Google Scholar
• Çoban, Ö., N. Özdemir, and M. Ş. Bellibaş. 2020. “Trust in Principals, Leaders’ Focus on Instruction, Teacher Collaboration, and Teacher Self-efficacy: Testing a Multilevel Mediation Model.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 174114322096817. doi:10.1177/1741143220968170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu, F., and U. Yurek. 2018. “School Administrators’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Leadership Styles.” European Journal of Educational Research 7 (3): 555–565.
   Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., and E. Skinner. 2003. “Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children’s Academic Engagement and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (1): 148–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Izquierdo, M., and J. M. Cordero. 2017. Guidelines for Data Fusion with International Large Scale Assessments: Insights from the TALIS-PISA Link. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/79781/1/MPRA_paper_79781.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Y. L., R. D. Goddard, L. P. Bailes, and R. Nichols. 2019. “From School Leadership to Differentiated Instruction.” The Elementary School Journal 120 (2): 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. F., and K. S. Louis. 2009. “Linking Parent and Community Involvement with Student Achievement: Comparing Principal and Teacher Perceptions of Stakeholder Influence.” American Journal of Education 116 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., A. J. Egalite, and C. A. Lindsay. 2021. How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research. Research Report. New York: Wallace Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gruneberg, M. M. 1979. Understanding job Satisfaction. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, Q., P. Sammons, and J. Chen. 2018. “How Principals of Successful Schools Enact Education Policy: Perceptions and Accounts from Senior and Middle Leaders.” Leadership and Policy in Schools 17 (3): 373–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumus, S., M. S. Bellibaş, M. Esen, and E. Gumus. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Studies on Leadership Models in Educational Research from 1980 to 2014.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (1): 25–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., L. Bickman, and K. Davis. 1996. “School Context, Principal Leadership, and Student Reading Achievement.” The Elementary School Journal 96 (5): 527–549. doi:10.1086/461843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., S. Gümüş, and M. Bellibaş. 2020. “'Are Principals Instructional Leaders Yet?' A Science Map of the Knowledge Base on Instructional Leadership, 1940–2018.” Scientometrics 122: 1629–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., and R. H. Heck. 2010. “Collaborative Leadership and School Improvement: Understanding the Impact on School Capacity and Student Learning.” School Leadership & Management 30 (2): 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., and R. C. Pianta. 2005. “Can Instructional and Emotional Support in the First-Grade Classroom Make a Difference for Children at Risk of School Failure?” Child Development 76: 949–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. 2007. System re-Design – 1: The Road to Transformation. London: SSAT.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2003. “Teacher Leadership as Distributed Leadership: Heresy, Fantasy or Possibility?” School Leadership & Management 23 (3): 313–324.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2005. “OP-ED.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (3): 255–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. 2008. “Distributed Leadership: According to the Evidence.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (2): 172–188.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., K. Leithwood, C. Day, P. Sammons, and D. Hopkins. 2007. “Distributed Leadership and Organizational Change: Reviewing the Evidence.” Journal of Educational Change 8 (4): 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and D. Muijs. 2004. Improving Schools through Teacher Leadership. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., and J. Spillane. 2008. “Distributed Leadership through the Looking Glass.” Management in Education 22 (1): 31–34.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R., and P. Hallinger. 2009. “Assessing the Contribution of Distributed Leadership to School Improvement and Growth in Math Achievement.” American Educational Research Journal 46 (3): 659–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., and P. Hallinger. 2010. “Testing a Longitudinal Model of Distributed Leadership Effects on School Improvement.” The Leadership Quarterly 21 (5): 867–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., M. Moerbeek, and R. van de Schoot. 2018. Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus new Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Y. Tang, W. He, and Q. Li. 2019. “Singapore’s School Excellence Model and Student Learning: Evidence from PISA 2012 and TALIS 2013.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 39 (1): 96–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. N. 2011. “Longitudinal Effects of Teacher and Student Perceptions of Teacher-Student Relationship Qualities on Academic Adjustment.” The Elementary School Journal 112 (1): 38–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., and O. M. Kwok. 2007. “Influence of Student-Teacher and Parent-Teacher Relationships on Lower Achieving Readers’ Engagement and Achievement in the Primary Grades.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99: 39–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., and G. Devos. 2009. “Exploring the Link between Distributed Leadership and Job Satisfaction of School Leaders.” Educational Studies 35 (2): 153–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulpia, H., G. Devos, and H. Van Keer. 2011. “The Relation between School Leadership from a Distributed Perspective and Teachers’ Organizational Commitment.” Educational Administration Quarterly 47 (5): 728–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalman, M., and M. C. Arslan. 2016. “School Principals’ Evaluations of their Instructional Leadership Behaviours: Realities vs. Ideals.” School Leadership & Management 36 (5): 508–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılınç, A. Ç., E. Er, and K. Beycioğlu. 2021. “Mapping the Terrain of Training and Appointment of Educational Leaders in the Turkish Context: An Historical Perspective.” In Internationalisation of Educational Administration and Leadership Curriculum (Studies in Educational Administration), edited by E. A. Samier, E. S. Elkaleh, and W. Hammad, 139–157. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Fourth Edition). New York and London: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., and D. Jantzi. 2000. “The Effects of Different Sources of Leadership on Student Engagement in School.” In Leadership for Change and School Reform, edited by K. Riley, and K. Louis, 50–66. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., B. Mascall, and T. Strauss. 2009. “New Perspectives on an Old Idea: A Short History of the Old Idea.” In Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence, edited by K. Leithwood, B. Mascall, and T. Strauss, 1–14. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., J. Sun, and R. Schumacker. 2020. “How School Leadership Influences Student Learning: A Test of “The Four Paths Model”.” Educational Administration Quarterly 56 (4): 570–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. 2020. “Focusing on the Practice of Distributed Leadership: The International Evidence from the 2013 TALIS.” Educational Administration Quarterly 56 (5): 779–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and M. Ş. Bellibaş. 2018. “School Factors that are Related to School Principals’ Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment.” International Journal of Educational Research 90: 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., M. Ş. Bellibaş, and S. Gümüş. 2021. “The Effect of Instructional Leadership and Distributed Leadership on Teacher Self-Efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Mediating Roles of Supportive School Culture and Teacher Collaboration.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49 (3): 430–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and S. M. Printy. 2017. “Distributed Leadership and Educator Attitudes.” In Emerging Issues and Trends in Education, edited by T. S. Ransaw, and R. Majors, 143–180. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and J. Werblow. 2019. “The Operation of Distributed Leadership and the Relationship with Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction of Principals and Teachers: A Multilevel Model and Meta-Analysis using the 2013 TALIS Data.” International Journal of Educational Research 96: 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. 1976. “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction.” In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by M. D. Dunnette, 1297–1349. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, J., and K. A. Leithwood. 2017. “Effects of Distributed Leadership on School Academic Press and Student Achievement.” In How School Leaders Contribute to Student Success, edited by K. Leithwood, J. Sun, and K. Pollock, 69–91. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M., and S. M. Printy. 2003. “Principal Leadership and School Performance: An Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership.” Educational Administration Quarterly 39 (3): 370–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascall, B., K. A. Leithwood, T. Straus, and R. Sacks. 2008. “The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and Teachers’ Academic Optimism.” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (2): 214–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education [MoNE]. 2018. Turkey’s 2023 Education Vision. Retrieved from http://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_EGITIM_VIZYONU.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998–2017. Mplus User’s Guide (Eighth Edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Turkey – Country Note –Results from PISA 2012 Problem Solving. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-results-turkey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019a. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019b. Turkey-Country Note-PISA 2018 Results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_TUR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oldac, Y. I., and Y. Kondakci. 2020. “Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship between School-Level Variables and Student Achievement.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 48 (4): 762–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, N., F. Gün, and A. Yirmibeş. 2021. “Learning–Centred Leadership and Student Achievement: Understanding the Mediating Effect of the Teacher Professional Community and Parental Involvement.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 174114322110341. doi:10.1177/17411432211034167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. H., I. H. Lee, and N. Cooc. 2018. “The Role of School-Level Mechanisms: How Principal Support, Professional Learning Communities, Collective Responsibility, and Group-Level Teacher Expectations Affect Student Achievement.” Educational Administration Quarterly 55 (5): 742–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40 (3): 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Printy, S., and Y. Liu. 2021. “Distributed Leadership Globally: The Interactive Nature of Principal and Teacher Leadership in 32 Countries.” Educational Administration Quarterly 57 (2): 290–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. 2006. “Putting Education Back into Educational Leadership.” Leading and Managing 12: 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., C. Lloyd, and K. Rowe. 2008. “The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types.” Educational Administration Quarterly 44 (5): 635–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., and J. L. Fleiss. 1979. “Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability.” Psychological Bulletin 86 (2): 420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silins, H., and W. Mulford. 2002. “Leadership and School Results.” In Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration, edited by K. Leithwood, and P. Hallinger, 561–612. Kluwer, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P., R. Halverson, and J. B. Diamond. 2001. “Investigating School Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective.” Educational Researcher 30 (3): 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. Y. 2018. “Examining School Leadership Effects on Student Achievement: The Role of Contextual Challenges and Constraints.” Cambridge Journal of Education 48 (1): 21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoonen, E. E., P. J. Sleegers, F. J. Oort, T. T. Peetsma, and F. P. Geijsel. 2011. “How to Improve Teaching Practices.” Educational Administration Quarterly 47 (3): 496–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., and R. Adams. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model to Psycho-Social Measurement: A Practical Approach. Educational Measurement Solutions, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur8331/edur8331-content/15-irt/2007-Wu-Apply-Rasch-Measurement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., X. Gao, and J. Shen. 2020b. “Principal Leadership Effects on Student Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis using Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 Data.” Educational Studies 46 (3): 316–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., J. Shen, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zheng. 2020a. “Examining the Effect of Principal Leadership on Student Science Achievement.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (6): 1017–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., and C. Qi. 2019. “The Relationship between Teacher-Student Relationship and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15 (10): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., H. M. Chipuer, M. Hanisch, P. A. Creed, and L. McGregor. 2006. “Relationships at School and Stage-Environment Fit as Resources for Adolescent Engagement and Achievement.” Journal of Adolescence 29: 911–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar