Standing waves and global well-posedness for the 2d Hartree equation with a point interaction

References

• Pickl, P. (2011). A simple derivation of mean field limits for quantum systems. Lett. Math. Phys. 97:151–164. DOI: 10.1007/s11005-011-0470-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikter, N., Porta, M., Schlein, B. (2016). Effective Evolution Equations from Quantum Dynamics. Vol. 7 of Springer Briefs in Mathematical Physics. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, N., Pickl, P. (2020). Derivation of the Maxwell-Schrödinger equations from the Pauli-Fierz Hamiltonian. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52:4900–4936. DOI: 10.1137/19M1307639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coclite, G. M., Georgiev, V. (2004). Solitary waves for Maxwell-Schrödinger equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 94:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, M., Wada, T. (2007). Global existence and uniqueness of solutions to the Maxwell-Schrödinger equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 276:315–339. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-007-0337-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginibre, J., Velo, G. (2008). Uniqueness at infinity in time for the Maxwell-Schrödinger system with arbitrarily large asymptotic data. Port. Math. 65:509–534. DOI: 10.4171/pm/1824.
   Google Scholar
• Colin, M., Watanabe, T. (2019). A refined stability result for standing waves of the Schrödinger-Maxwell system. Nonlinearity 32:3695–3714. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab248c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, P., Marcati, P., Scandone, R. (2022). Global well-posedness for the non-linear Maxwell-Schrödinger system. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. 5:1293–1324. DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.202010_033.
   Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Sacchetti, A. (2005). The transition from diffusion to blow-up for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation in dimension 1. J. Phys. A 38:8379–8392. DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/38/39/006.
   Google Scholar
• Della Casa, F. F. G., Sacchetti, A. (2006). Stationary states for non linear one-dimensional Schrödinger equations with singular potential. Phys. D 219:60–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2006.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuizumi, R., Jeanjean, L. (2008). Stability of standing waves for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 21:121–136. DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2008.21.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuizumi, R., Ohta, M., Ozawa, T. (2008). Nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a point defect. Ann. Inst. H.Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 25:837–845. DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Coz, S., Fukuizumi, R., Fibich, G., Ksherim, B., Yonatan, S. (2008). Instability of bound states of a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a Dirac potential. Phys. D 237:1103–1128. DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2007.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Noja, D. (2009). Existence of dynamics for a 1D NLS equation perturbed with a generalized point defect. J. Phys. A 42:495302, 19. DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/49/495302.
   Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Noja, D., Visciglia, N. (2013). Constrained energy minimization and ground states for NLS with point defects. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 18:1155–1188. DOI: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Noja, D. (2014). Exactly solvable models and bifurcations: the case of the cubic NLS with a δ or a δ′ interaction in dimension one. Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 9:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo Pava, J., Ferreira, L. C. F. (2014). On the Schrödinger equation with singular potentials. Differ. Integral Equ. 27:767–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banica, V., Visciglia, N. (2016). Scattering for NLS with a delta potential. J. Differ. Equ. 260:4410–4439. DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M., Inui, T. (2017). Global dynamics below the standing waves for the focusing semilinear Schrödinger equation with a repulsive Dirac delta potential. Anal. PDE 10:481–512. DOI: 10.2140/apde.2017.10.481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianni, I., Le Coz, S., Royer, J. (2017). On the Cauchy problem and the black solitons of a singularly perturbed Gross-Pitaevskii equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 49:1060–1099. DOI: 10.1137/15M1029606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccagna, S., Maeda, M. (2019). On stability of small solitons of the 1-D NLS with a trapping delta potential. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 51:4311–4331. DOI: 10.1137/19M1258402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo Pava, J., Hernández Melo, C. A. (2019). On stability properties of the cubic-quintic Schrödinger equation with δ -point interaction. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 18:2093–2116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki, S., Murphy, J., Segata, J.-I. (2019). Modified scattering for the one-dimensional cubic NLS with a repulsive delta potential. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2019:7577–7603. DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rny011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki, S., Murphy, J., Segata, J.-I. (2020). Stability of small solitary waves for the one-dimensional NLS with an attractive delta potential. Anal. PDE 13:1099–1128. DOI: 10.2140/apde.2020.13.1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaki, S., Murphy, J., Segata, J.-I. (2021). A survey on asymptotic stability of ground states of nonlinear Schrödinger equations II. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 14:1693–1716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiev, V., Michelangeli, A., Scandone, R. (2018). On fractional powers of singular perturbations of the Laplacian. J. Funct. Anal. 275:1551–1602. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelangeli, A., Olgiati, A., Scandone, R. (2018). Singular Hartree equation in fractional perturbed Sobolev spaces. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 25:558–588. DOI: 10.1080/14029251.2018.1503423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciapuoti, C., Finco, D., Noja, D. (2021). Well posedness of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with isolated singularities. J. Differ. Equ. 305:288–318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2021.10.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Boni, F., Carlone, R., Tentarelli, L. (2022). Ground states for the planar NLSE with a point defect as minimizers of the constrained energy. Calc. Var. 61:195. DOI: 10.1007/s00526-022-02310-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami, R., Boni, F., Carlone, R., Tentarelli, L. (2022). Existence, structure, and robustness of ground states of a NLSE in 3D with a point defect. J. Math. Phys. 63:071501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukaya, N., Georgiev, V., Ikeda, M. (2022). On stability and instability of standing waves for 2d-nonlinear Schrödinger equations with point interaction. J. Differ. Equ. 321:258–295. DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2022.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boni, F., Gallone, M. (2023). Two dimensional NLS ground states with attractive Coulomb potential and point interaction. arXiv:2304.13629.
   Google Scholar
• Boni, F., Gallone, M. (2020). Erratum: Two-dimensional Schrödinger operators with point interactions: threshold expansions, zero modes and Lp -boundedness of wave operators. Rev. Math. Phys. 32:2092001, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornean, H. D., Michelangeli, A., Yajima, K. (2019). Two-dimensional Schrödinger operators with point interactions: threshold expansions, zero modes and Lp -boundedness of wave operators. Rev. Math. Phys. 31:1950012, 32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yajima, K. (2021). Lp -boundedness of wave operators for 2D Schrödinger operators with point interactions. Ann. Henri Poincaré 22:2065–2101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yajima, K. (2005). Solvable Models in Quantum Mechanics. 2nd ed. Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing. With an appendix by Pavel Exner.
   Google Scholar
• Albeverio, S., Gesztesy, F., Hø egh-Krohn, R., Holden, H. (1987). Point interactions in two dimensions: basic properties, approximations and applications to solid state physics. J. Reine Angew. Math. 380:87–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelangeli, A., Scandone, R. (2019). Point-like perturbed fractional Laplacians through shrinking potentials of finite range. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 13:3717–3752. DOI: 10.1007/s11785-019-00927-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallone, M., Michelangeli, A., Ottolini, A. (2020). Kreĭn-Višik-Birman self-adjoint extension theory revisited. In: Michelangeli, A., ed. Mathematical Challenges of Zero Range Physics. INdAM-Springer Series, Vol. 42. Cham: Springer, pp. 239–304.
   Google Scholar
• (2023). Self-Adjoint Extension Schemes and Modern Applications to Quantum Hamiltonians. Cham: Springer. Foreword by Sergio Albeverio.
   Google Scholar
• Kesavan, S. (2006). Symmetrization & Applications. Vol. 3 of Series in Analysis. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cazenave, T. (2003). Semilinear Schrödinger equations. Vol. 10 of Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics. New York: New York University Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Michelangeli, A. (2015). Global well-posedness of the magnetic Hartree equation with non-Strichartz external fields. Nonlinearity 28:2743–2765. DOI: 10.1088/0951-7715/28/8/2743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, P., Michelangeli, A., Scandone, R. (2018). Global, finite energy, weak solutions for the NLS with rough, time-dependent magnetic potentials. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 69:46. DOI: 10.1007/s00033-018-0938-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okazawa, N., Suzuki, T., Yokota, T. (2012). Energy methods for abstract nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Evol. Equ. Control Theory 1:337–354. DOI: 10.3934/eect.2012.1.337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Vol. 55 of National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, W. A. (1977). Existence of solitary waves in higher dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. 55:149–162. DOI: 10.1007/BF01626517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergh, J., Löfström, J. (1976). Interpolation Spaces. An Introduction. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. Berlin-New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ancona, P., Pierfelice, V., Teta, A. (2006). Dispersive estimate for the Schrödinger equation with point interactions. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 29:309–323. DOI: 10.1002/mma.682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchêne, V., Marzuola, J. L., Weinstein, M. I. (2011). Wave operator bounds for one-dimensional Schrödinger operators with singular potentials and applications. J. Math. Phys. 52:013505, 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iandoli, F., Scandone, R. (2017). Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators with point interactions in R3 . In: Michelangeli, A., Dell’Antonio, G., eds. Advances in Quantum Mechanics: Contemporary Trends and Open Problems. Springer INdAM Series, Vol. 18. Cham: Springer, pp. 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Dell’Antonio, G., Michelangeli, A., Scandone, R., Yajima, K. (2018). Lp -Boundedness of Wave Operators for the Three-Dimensional Multi-Centre Point Interaction. Ann. Henri Poincaré 19:283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, M., Kiselev, A. (2001). Maximal functions associated to filtrations. J. Funct. Anal. 179:409–425. DOI: 10.1006/jfan.2000.3687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttinger, J. M., Friedberg, R. (1976). A new rearrangement inequality for multiple integrals. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 61:45–64. DOI: 10.1007/BF00251862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brascamp, H. J., Lieb, E. H., Luttinger, J. M. (1974). A general rearrangement inequality for multiple integrals. J. Funct. Anal. 17:227–237. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1236(74)90013-5.
   Google Scholar
• Burchard, A., Ferone, A. (2015). On the extremals of the Pólya-Szegő inequality. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 64:1447–1463. DOI: 10.1512/iumj.2015.64.5652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brothers, J. E., Ziemer, W. P. (1988). Minimal rearrangements of Sobolev functions. J. Reine Angew. Math. 384:153–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronszajn, N., Smith, K. T. (1961). Theory of Bessel potentials. I. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 11:385–475. DOI: 10.5802/aif.116.
   Google Scholar