215
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Impact of Flavor Factorized by Alcohol Level and Flavor Type on ‘Beer Refreshing Perception’ in a Model Study and the Exploration of Sensory Drivers for ‘Refreshing’

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 78-91 | Received 08 Nov 2022, Accepted 18 Mar 2023, Published online: 21 Apr 2023

Literature cited

  • Ramirez, J. L.; Hampton, A.; Du, X. Examining the Consumer View of Refreshing Perception, Relevant Fruits, Vegetables, Soft Drinks, and Beers, and Consumer Age and Gender Segmentations. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 2516–2531. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2857.
  • Labbe, D.; Almiron-Roig, E.; Hudry, J.; Leathwood, P.; Schifferstein, H. N. J.; Martin, N. Sensory Basis of Refreshing Perception: Role of Psychophysiological Factors and Food Experience. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 98, 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.007.
  • Zellner, D. A.; Durlach, P. Effect of Color on Expected and Experienced Refreshment, Intensity, and Liking of Beverages. Am. J. Psychol. 2003, 116, 633–647. DOI: 10.2307/1423663.
  • Labbe, D.; Gilbert, F.; Antille, N.; Martin, N. Sensory Determinants of Refreshing. Food Qual Preference 2009, 20, 100–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.09.001.
  • Ortal, P.; Edahiro, M. Similarity Measure for Product Attribute Estimation. Access 2020, 8, 179073–179082. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3027023.
  • Betancur, M. I.; Motoki, K.; Spence, C.; Velasco, C. Factors Influencing the Choice of Beer: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, e109367. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109367.
  • Guinard, J. X.; Souchard, A.; Picot, M.; Rogeaux, M.; Sieffermann, J. M. Determinants of the Thirst-Quenching Character of Beer. Appetite 1998, 31, 101–115. DOI: 10.1006/appe.1998.0165.
  • Gains, N.; Thomson, D. M. H. Contextual Evaluation of Canned Lagers Using Repertory Grid Method. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 25, 699–705. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01131.x.
  • Scriven, F. M.; Gains, N.; Green, S. R.; Thomson, D. M. H. A Contextual Evaluation of Alcoholic Beverages Using the Repertory Grid Method. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 24, 173–182. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1989.tb00631.x.
  • Bettenhausen, H. M.; Benson, A.; Fisk, S.; Herb, D.; Hernandez, J.; Lim, J.; Queisser, S. H.; Shellhammer, T. H.; Vega, V.; Yao, L.; et al. Variation in Sensory Attributes and Volatile Compounds in Beers Brewed from Genetically Distinct Malts: An Integrated Sensory and Non-Targeted Metabolomics Approach. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2020, 78, 136–152. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2019.1706037.
  • Giacalone, D.; Bredie, W. L. P.; Frøst, M. B. All-in-One Test"(AI1): a Rapid and Easily Applicable Approach to Consumer Product Testing. Food Qual. Preference 2013, 27, 108–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.09.011.
  • Aquilani, B.; Laureti, T.; Poponi, S.; Secondi, L. Beer Choice and Consumption Determinants When Craft Beers Are Tasted: An Exploratory Study of Consumer Preferences. Food Qual. Preference 2015, 41, 214–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.12.005.
  • Blackmore, H.; Hidrio, C.; Godineau, P.; Yeomans, M. R. The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Extrinsic Cues on Hedonic and Sensory Expectations in the Context of Beer. Food Qual. Preference 2020, 81, e103855. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103855.
  • Giacalone, D.; Frøst, M. B.; Bredie, W. L.; Pineau, B.; Hunter, D. C.; Paisley, A. G.; Beresford, M. K.; Jaeger, S. R. Situational Appropriateness of Beer is Influenced by Product Familiarity. Food Qual. Preference 2015, 39, 16–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.012.
  • Worch, T.; Sinesio, F.; Moneta, E.; Abbà, S.; Dreyfuss, L.; McEwan, J. A.; Porcherot-Lassallette, C. Influence of Different Test Conditions on the Emotional Responses Elicited by Beers. Food Qual. Preference 2020, 83, e103895. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103895.
  • Silva, A. P.; Jager, G.; Van Bommel, R.; Van Zyl, H.; Voss, H. P.; Hogg, T.; Pintado, M.; De Graaf, C. Functional or Emotional? How Dutch and Portuguese Conceptualise Beer, Wine and Non-Alcoholic Beer Consumption. Food Qual. Preference 2016, 49, 54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.007.
  • Des Gachons, C. P.; Avrillier, J.; Gleason, M.; Algarra, L.; Zhang, S.; Mura, E.; Nagai, H.; Breslin, P. A. Oral Cooling and Carbonation Increase the Perception of Drinking and Thirst Quenching in Thirsty Adults. PLoS One. 2016, 11, e0162261. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162261.
  • Barker, A. B.; Britton, J.; Grant-Braham, B.; Murray, R. L. Alcohol Audio-Visual Content in Formula 1 Television Broadcasting. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 1155–1161. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6068-3.
  • Linhares, B. V.; Barth, M.; Sanfelice, G. R.; Pinheiro, C. M. P.; Lucena, L. A Heineken 0.0 E O Marketing NA Campanha Now You can - Heineken 0.0 and Marketing in the "Now You Can" Campaign. Caderno Profissional de Marketing 2021, 9, 128–149.
  • Ramirez, J. L.; Juma, S.; Du, X. Consumer Acceptance of Watermelon Flesh-Rind Blends and the Effect of Rind on Refreshing Perception. J. Food Sci. 2021, 86, 1384–1392. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15648.
  • Du, X.; Davila, M.; Williams, C.; Weng, Y. Fresh Cucumber Fruit Physicochemical Properties, Consumer Acceptance, and Impact of Variety and Harvest Date. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 616–629. DOI: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00433.
  • Vasiljevic, M.; Couturier, D.; Marteau, T. M. Impact on Product Appeal of Labeling Wine and Beer with (a) Lower Strength Alcohol Verbal Descriptors and (b) Percent Alcohol by Volume (%ABV): An Experimental Study. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 2018, 32, 779–791. DOI: 10.1037/adb0000376.
  • Missbach, B.; Majchrzak, D.; Sulzner, R.; Wansink, B.; Reichel, M.; Koenig, J. Exploring the Flavor Life Cycle of Beers with Varying Alcohol Content. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 5, 889–895. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.472.
  • Thibodeau, M.; Pickering, G. J. The Role of Taste in Alcohol Preference, Consumption and Risk Behavior. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 676–692. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1387759.
  • Kausar, H.; Saeed, S.; Ahmad, M. M.; Salam, A. Studies on the Development and Storage Stability of Cucumber-Melon Functional Drink. Agric. Res 2012, 50, 239–248. DOI: 10.13140/rg.2.2.35674.18886.
  • Lafontaine, S.; Senn, K.; Dennenlöhr, J.; Schubert, C.; Knoke, L.; Maxminer, J.; Cantu, A.; Rettberg, N.; Heymann, H. Characterizing Volatile and Nonvolatile Factors Influencing Flavor and American Consumer Preference toward Nonalcoholic Beer. ACS Omega. 2020, 5, 23308–23321. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03168.
  • Zellner, D. A.; Durlach, P. What is Refreshing? An Investigation of the Color and Other Sensory Attributes of Refreshing Foods and Beverages. Appetite 2002, 39, 185–186. DOI: 10.1006/appe.2002.0502.
  • Higgins, M. J.; Bakke, A. J.; Hayes, J. E. Personality Traits and Bitterness Perception Influence the Liking and Intake of Pale Ale Style Beers. Food Qual. Preference 2020, 86, e103944. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103994.
  • Fox, D.; Sahin, A. W.; De Schutter, D. P.; Arendt, E. K. Mouthfeel of Beer: Development of Tribology Method and Correlation with Sensory Data from an Online Database. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2022, 80, 112–127. DOI: 10.1080/03610470.2021.1938430.
  • Clark, R.; Linforth, R.; Bealin-Kelly, F.; Hort, J. Effects of Ethanol, Carbonation and Hop Acids on Volatile Delivery in a Model Beer System. J. Inst. Brew. 2011, 117, 74–81. DOI: 10.1002/j.2050-0416.2011.tb00446.x.
  • Ickes, C. M.; Cadwallader, K. R. Effects of Ethanol on Flavor Perception in Alcoholic Beverages. Chem. Percept. 2017, 10, 119–134. DOI: 10.1007/s12078-017-9238-2.
  • Zenit, R.; Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. The Fluid Mechanics of Bubbly Drinks. Phys. Today 2018, 71, 44–50. DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.4069.
  • Wise, P. M.; Wolf, M.; Thom, S. R.; Bryant, B. The Influence of Bubbles on the Perception Carbonation Bite. PLoS One. 2013, 8, e0071488. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071488.
  • McEwan, J. A.; Colwill, J. S. The Sensory Assessment of the Thirst-Quenching Characteristics of Drinks. Food Qual Preference 1996, 7, 101–111. DOI: 10.1016/0950-3293(95)00042-9.
  • Rankin, K. M.; Marks, L. E. Effects of Context on Sweet and Bitter Tastes: Unrelated to Sensitivity to PROP (6-Npropylthiouracil). Percept. Psychophys. 1992, 52, 479–486. DOI: 10.3758/BF03206709.
  • Tuorila, H. Hedonic Responses to Flavor and Their Implications for Food Acceptance. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1996, 7, 453–456. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2244(96)10048-0.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.