Fabrication of gelatin/silk fibroin/phage nanofiber scaffold effective against multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

References

• Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires DP, Vilas Boas D, Sillankorva S, et al. Phage therapy: a step forward in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Virol. 2015;89(15):7449–7456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajardo A, Martinez-Martin N, Mercadillo M, et al. The neglected intrinsic resistome of bacterial pathogens. PLOS One. 2008;3(2):e1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breidenstein EBM, de la Fuente-Núñez C, Hancock REW. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: all roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19(8):419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Solano L, Macia MD, Fajardo A, et al. Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(12):1526–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez L, Breidenstein EB, Hancock RE. Creeping baselines and adaptive resistance to antibiotics. Drug Resist Updat. 2011;14(1):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(5):634–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brussow H, Hendrix RW. Phage genomics: small is beautiful. Cell. 2002;108(1):13–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monk AB, Rees CD, Barrow P, et al. Bacteriophage applications: where are we now? Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;51(4):363–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HW, Huggins MB. Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics. J Gen Microbiol. 1982;128(2):307–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith HW, Huggins MB. Effectiveness of Phg in treating experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves, piglets and lambs. J Gen Microbiol. 1983;129:2659–2675.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith HW, Huggins MB, Shaw KM. Factors influencing the survival and multiplication of bacteriophages in calves and in their environment. J Gen Microbiol. 1987;133(5):1127–1135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soothill JS. Treatment of experimental infections of mice with bacterioPhg. J Med Microbiol. 1992;37(4):258–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibani-Chennoufi S, Sidoti J, Bruttin A, et al. In vitro and in vivo bacteriolytic activities of Escherichia coli phages: implications for phage therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(7):2558–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soothill JS. Phg prevents destruction of skin grafts by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Burns. 1994;20(3):209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodkumar CS, Kalsurmath S, Neelagund YF. Utility of lytic bacteriophage in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicemia in mice . Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2008;51(3):360–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furusawa T, Iwano H, Higuchi H, et al. Bacteriophage can lyse antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from canine diseases . J Vet Med Sci. 2016;78(6):1035–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu TK, Koeris MS. The next generation of Phg therapy. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14(5):524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korehei R, Kadla J. Incorporation of T4 bacteriophage in electrospun fibres. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114(5):1425–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salalha W, Kuhn J, Dror Y, et al. Encapsulation of bacteria and viruses in electrospun nanofibres. Nanotechnology. 2006;17(18):4675–4681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjum F, Agabalyan NA, Sparks HD, et al. Biocomposite nanofiber matrices to support ECM remodeling by human dermal progenitors and enhanced wound closure. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikkhah M, Akbari M, Paul A, et al. Gelatin‐based biomaterials for tissue engineering and stem cell bioengineering. Biomater Nature Adv Dev Ther. 2016;14:37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gaspar-Pintiliescu A, Stanciuc AM, Craciunescu O. Natural composite dressings based on collagen, gelatin and plant bioactive compounds for wound healing: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;138:854–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouhan D, Mandal BB. Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: from bench to bedside. Acta Biomater. 2020;103:24–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil ES, Panilaitis B, Bellas E, et al. Functionalized silk biomaterials for wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2013;2(1):206–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta A, Fambri L, Migliaresi C. Regenerated silk fibroin films: thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis. Macromol Chem Phys. 2002; 203(10–11):1658–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Wang B. Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10(4):1514–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiwei B, Youzhu Z, Guibo Y, et al. The structure and property of the electrospinning silk fibroin/gelatin blend nanofibers. e-Polymers. 2008;8(1):1131–1139.
   Google Scholar
• Gui-Bo Y, You-Zhu Z, Shu-Dong W, et al. Study of the electrospun PLA/silk fibroin-gelatin composite nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93(1):158–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang Z, Xu LS, Yin F, et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of silk fibroin/gelatin composite scaffolds for liver tissue engineering. J Dig Dis. 2012;13(3):168–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calamak S, Erdogdu C, Ozalp M, et al. Silk fibroin based antibacterial bionanotextiles as wound dressing materials. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014; 43:11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdari M, Shakiba E, Kiaie SH, et al. Preparation and characterization of ceftazidime loaded electrospun silk fibroin/gelatin mat for wound dressing. Fibers Polym. 2016;17(5):744–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrity GM. The proteobacteria. New York: Bergeys’s Manaul of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Willey J, Sherwood L, Woolverton C. Prescott’s microbiology. New York: McGraw Hill 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews JM. BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48:43–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey-Smith GV, Billington C, Cornelius AJ, et al. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting Salmonella spp. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;258(2):182–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenholm AR, Dalsgaard I, Middelboe M. Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(13):4070–4078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez V, Moineau S, Reinheimer J, et al. Lactococcuslactis bacterioPhg: genetic characterization and adsorption studies. J Appl Microbiol. 2008; 104(2):371–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackermann HW, Brochu G, Emadi Konjin HP. Classification of Acinetobacter phages. Arch Virol. 1994;135(3–4):345–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson T, Yuan XF, Bayat A. Electrospun silk fibroin fiber diameter influences in vitro dermal fibroblast behavior and promotes healing of ex vivo wound models. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:204173141455166. 2041731414551661.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth LA, Downes S. Acetone, a sustainable solvent for electrospinning poly (ε-caprolactone) fibres: effect of varying parameters and solution concentrations on fibre diameter. J Polym Environ. 2012;3:879–886.
   Google Scholar
• Jia Y-T, Gong J, Gu X-H, et al. Fabrication and characterization of poly (vinyl alcohol)/chitosan blend nanofibers produced by electrospinning method. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;67(3):403–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, et al. The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer. 2001;42(1):261–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong XH, Kim KS, Fang DF, et al. Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofber membranes. Polymer. 2;43(16):4403–4412.
   Google Scholar
• Erencia M, Cano F, Tornero JA, et al. Electrospinning of gelatin fibers using solutions with low acetic acid concentration: effect of solvent composition on both diameter of electrospun fibers and cytotoxicity. J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;132(25):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar