Margaret Archer’s theory of the human person: an assessment

References

• Al-Amoudi, I. (2017). Reflexivity in a just morphogenic society: A sociological contribution to political philosophy. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Morphogenesis and human flourishing (pp. 63–91). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Amoudi, I. (2022). Are post-human technologies dehumanizing? Human enhancement and artificial intelligence in contemporary societies. Journal of Critical Realism, 21(5), 516–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2022.2134618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human. The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2015). Foreword: Varieties of relational social theory. In P. Donati, A. Malo, & G. Maspero (Eds.), Social science, philosophy and theology in dialogue. A relational approach (pp. viii–xxvii). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2019a). Bodies, persons and human enhancement. Why these distinctions matter. In I. Al-Amoudi & J. Morgan (Eds.), Realist responses to post-human society: Ex machina (pp. 10–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2019b). Considering AI personhood. In I. Al-Amoudi & E. Lazega (Eds.), Post-human institutions and organisations: Confronting the matrix (pp. 28–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. (2021). Friendship between human beings and AI robots? In J. von Braun, M. Archer, G. M. Reichberg, & M. S. Sorondo (Eds.), Robotics, AI and humanity; science, ethics, and policy (pp. 177–190). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S., Collier, A., & Porpora, D. V. (Eds.). (2004). Transcendence. Critical realism and god. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S., & Maccarini, A. (2021). Introduction. In M. S. Archer & A. Maccarini (Eds.), What is essential to being human? Can AI robots not share it? (pp. 1–25). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M., Gibbs, M., Kohn, T., Meese, J., & Nansen, B. (2018). Death and digital media. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1989). The possibility of naturalism. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2010). Reflexivity after modernity: From the viewpoint of relational sociology. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about reflexivity (pp. 144–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology. A New paradigm for the social sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2014). Social capital and the added value of social relations. International Review of Sociology—Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 24(2), 291–308.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2016). The ‘relational subject’ according to a critical realist relational sociology. Journal of Critical Realism, 15(4), 352–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2016.1166728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2021). Transcending modernity with relational thinking. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2023). Alterità. Sul confine fra l’Io e l’Altro. Città Nuova.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2024). Being human in a virtual society: A relational approach. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P., & Archer, M. S. (2015). The relational subject. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, R. (2002). Immunitas. Protezione e negazione della vita. Einaudi.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrito, M., Needs, A., Jingree, T., & Pearson, D. (2020). Making sense of the dark: A study on the identity of men who committed homicide. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 20(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.1714399
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. (2023). The human person, the human social individual and community interactions. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 47(3), 475–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bead016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2021). Unpacking the black box of a mature student’s processes of social engagement: Focusing on reflexivity, structure and agency. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(6), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1927986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. (2018). Critical realism as relational sociology. In F. Dépelteau (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 395–411). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. (2010). What is a person? Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1985). The concept of a person. In C. Taylor, Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 97–114). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2006, July). A Nascent robotics culture: New complicities for companionship. AAAI Technical Report Series. doi:10.4324/9781003074991-12
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, K. (2013). The disappearing human–machine divide. Approaching Religion, 3(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.67511
   Google Scholar