The feeling of thinking: social annotation with emojis

References

• Anwaruddin, S. 2016. “Why Critical Literacy Should Turn to ‘The Affective Turn’: Making a Case for Critical Affective Literacy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (3): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1042429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., Q. Dan, Z. Mu, and M. Yang. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Emoji: Current Research and Future Perspectives.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2221). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C., and G. Merchant. 2021. “Returning to Text: Affect, Meaning Making, and Literacies.” Reading Research Quarterly 56 (2): 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Science and the Imagination. 2018. “Frankenbook.” Accessed June 9, 2023. https://www.frankenbook.org.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. W., and J. W. Pow. 2020. “The Role of Social Annotation in Facilitating Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning.” Computers & Education 147:103787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., M. DeCoursey, S. W. S. Lee, and K. Li. 2021. ““Something Fruitful for All of Us”: Social Annotation as a Signature Pedagogy for Literature Education.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 20 (3): 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220915128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. 2017. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, S. L. 1996. Reading with Feeling. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2011. “Context Stinks!” New Literary History 42 (4): 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2011.0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 2020. Hooked: Art and Attachment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F. 2013. “A Case Study of Using a Social Annotation Tool to Support Collaboratively Learning.” The Internet and Higher Education 17:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadirian, H., K. Salehi, and A. F. M. Ayub. 2018. “Social Annotation Tools in Higher Education: A Preliminary Systematic Review.” International Journal of Learning Technology 13 (2): 130–162. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2018.092096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillory, J. 1993. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. 2013. “Affect as Method: Feelings, Aesthetics, and Affective Pedagogy.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by R. Coleman and J. Ringrose, 79–95. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalir, J. H., E. Morales, A. Fleerackers, and J. P. Alperin. 2020. ““When I Saw My Peers annotating”: Student Perceptions of Social Annotation for Learning in Multiple Courses.” Information & Learning Sciences 121 (3/4): 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2019-0128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, S. 2014. “Making Interpretation Visible with an Affect‐Based Strategy.” Reading Research Quarterly 49 (3): 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S., K. Trepper, R. H. Chung, and R. Coelho. 2021. “How Feeling Supports students’ Interpretive Discussions About Literature.” Journal of Literacy Research 53 (4): 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2015. Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, C. A., and S. Jarvie. 2018. “The Limits of Resistant Reading in Critical Literacy Practices.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 17 (4): 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-01-2018-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miall, D. S. 2006. Literary Reading: Empirical & Theoretical Studies. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2007. “Chapter 1 Developing Socially Just Subject-Matter Instruction: A Review of the Literature on Disciplinary Literacy Teaching.” Review of Research in Education 31 (1): 1–44. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07300046001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2015. “Doing and Teaching Disciplinary Literacy with Adolescent Learners: A Social and Cultural Enterprise.” Harvard Educational Review 85 (2): 254–278. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, E., J. H. Kalir, A. Fleerackers, and J. P. Alperin. 2022. “Using Social Annotation to Construct Knowledge with Others: A Case Study Across Undergraduate Courses.” F1000research 11 (235): 235. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109525.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Novak, E., R. Razzouk, and T. E. Johnson. 2012. “The Educational Use of Social Annotation Tools in Higher Education: A Literature Review.” The Internet and Higher Education 15 (1): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dell, K. 2020. “Modern marginalia: using digital annotation in the composition classroom.” Computers and Composition 56 (102570): 102570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102570.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeirim, B. M. 2023. “Literary Attachment and the American Spoken-Word Song: An Interarts-Based Reading Pedagogy.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 23 (1): 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222231174607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, G. W. 2021. “Collaborative Online Annotation: Pedagogy, Assessment, and Platform Comparisons.” Frontiers in Education 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.852849.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, T., L. S. Rush, J. P. Holschuh, and J. P. Lampi 2022. “Generating, Weaving, and Curating: Disciplinary Processes for Reading Literary Text.” English Teaching: Practice & Critique. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0070/full/html.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan, M. A. 2017. “Emojis as Tools for Emotion Work: Communicating Affect in Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 36 (5): 549–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2005. Deeper Than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprouse, M. 2018. “Social Annotation and Layered Readings in Composition.” In: Proceedings of the 2018 Computers & Writing Conference. Denver: WAC Clearinghouse, 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, L., and K. Crawford. 2015. “The Conservatism of Emoji: Work, Affect, and Communication.” Social Media + Society 1 (2): 205630511560485. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., G. J. Hwang, Z. Yin, Z. Wang, and Z. Wang. 2023. “Trends and Issues of Social Annotation in Education: A Systematic Review from 2000 to 2020.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39 (2): 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traester, M., C. Kervina, and N. H. Brathwaite. 2021. “Pedagogy to Disrupt the Echo Chamber: Digital Annotation as Critical Community to Promote Active Reading.” Pedagogy 21 (2): 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-8811517.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, L. 2004. “What’s Love Got to Do with It? The Effect of Affect in the Academy.” Politikon 31 (1): 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340410001690837.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2016. “Making Sense of the Complex Entanglement Between Emotion and Pedagogy: Contributions of the Affective Turn.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 11 (3): 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9623-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., B. Chen, R. M. Avadhanam, H. Shui, and R. Z. Zhang. 2020. “Reading and Connecting: Using Social Annotation in Online Classes.” Information & Learning Sciences 121 (5/6): 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar