Stakeholder perceptions of what industry wants from doctoral students: a systematic literature review

References

• Acosta, S., Garza, T., Hsu, H., & Goodson, P. (2020). Assessing quality in systematic literature reviews: A study of novice rater training. SAGE Open, 10(3), Article 2158244020939530. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020939530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen Consulting Group. (2010). Employer demand for researchers in Australia (Report to Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research: Canberra, A.C.T.). https://webarchive.nla.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Andalib, M.A., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Larson, R.C. (2018). The postdoc queue: A labour force in waiting. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auriol, L. (2010). Careers of doctorate holders: Employment and mobility patterns. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, Article 201004. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmh8phxvvf5-en
   Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L., Brown, T., Dearing, A., Font, J., Hagen, S., Metcalfe, J., & Smith, J. (2010). Collaborative doctoral education: University-industry partnerships for enhancing knowledge exchange. Higher Education Policy, 23(4), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Mountford-Zimdars, A. (2017). Exploring academic hiring and life in humanities and social sciences at an English research university through a PhD students-as-partners project. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-02-2016-0001
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J.F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.A., Mewburn, I., & Suonimen, H. (2020). A machine-learning based model to identify PhD-level skills in job ads. The 18th Annual Workshop of the Australasian Language Technology Association, 72–80. https://aclanthology.org/2020.alta-1.8.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, G. (2007). Deconstructing the skills training debate in doctoral education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701658591
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Q., & Harshman, J. (2020). Qualitative investigation to identify the knowledge and skills that US-trained doctoral chemists require in typical chemistry positions. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, D.M. (2018). Extending the user fee approach to pharmaceuticals. JAMA, 320(15), 1525–1526. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). The PhD factory: The world is producing more PhDs than ever before. Is it time to stop? Nature, 472(7343), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grande, H., De Boyser, K., Vandevelde, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2014). From academia to industry: Are doctorate holders ready? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 538–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0192-9
   Google Scholar
• Dufty-Jones, R. (2018). The career aspirations and expectations of geography doctoral students: Establishing academic subjectivities within a shifting landscape. Geographical Research, 56(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R.G., Jakubson, G.H., Groen, J.A., So, E., & Price, J. (2007). Inside the black box of doctoral education: What program characteristics influence doctoral students’ attrition and graduation probabilities? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707301707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Martínez, C., Ho, P., Cunha, L., Schlüter, O., & Pittia, P. (2015). Identifying the most important skills for PhD students in food science and technology: A comparison between industry and academic stakeholders. International Journal of Food Studies, 4(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a5
   Google Scholar
• Group of Eight. (2013). The changing PhD: Demand and supply. Chemistry in Australia, Dec 2013, 16–19. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.731514374174888
   Google Scholar
• Haapakorpi, A. (2017). Doctorate holders outside the academy in Finland: Academic engagement and industry-specific competence. Journal of Education and Work, 30(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1119257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe, R. (2007). Can generic skills training change academic culture? In R. Hinchcliffe, T. Bromley, & S. Hutchinson (Eds.), Skills training in research degree programmes: Politics and practice (pp. 3–14). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C., Milos, D., & Kerr, M. (2019). Mentoring for employability: A state-level impact study. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 10(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-04-2019-0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., & Michelson, G. (2016). PhD-educated employees and the development of generic skills. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 42(1), 108–134. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.213553
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, E. (1995). Too many scientists, too few academic jobs. Nature Medicine, 1(1), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0195-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2014). Coursework in Australian PhD programs: What’s happening, why, and future directions. The Australian National University. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/ID12_2223_Kiley_%20report_2014_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., & Olsen, T.B. (2012). The relevance of doctoral training in different labour markets. Journal of Education and Work, 25(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2010.538376
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R.C., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xue, Y. (2014). Too many PhD graduates or too few academic job openings: The basic reproductive number Ro in academia. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(6), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., Cox, L., Boreham, P., Mellick, G., & Lant, P. (2012). Evaluating industry-based doctoral research programs: Perspectives and outcomes of Australian cooperative research centre graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 37(7), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.554607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., Pitt, R., & Critchley, C. (2009). Graduate attribute development and employment outcomes: Tracking PhD graduates. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, R., Peetz, D., & Strachan, G. (2013). The casual academic workforce and labour market segmentation in Australia. Labour & Industry, 23(3), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2013.839085
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, P., & Wienk, M. (2019, n.d.). Advancing Australia’s knowledge economy: Who are the top PhD employers. Australian Mathematical Science Institute and CSIRO’s Data61 Ribit. https://www.ribit.net/blog/advancing-australias-knowledge-economy-top-phd-employers/
   Google Scholar
• Mewburn, I., Grant, W.J., Suominen, H., & Kizimchuk, S. (2020). A machine learning analysis of the non-academic employment opportunities for Ph.D. graduates in Australia. Higher Education Policy, 33(4), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-018-0098-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J.C., Coble, K.H., & Lusk, J.L. (2013). Evaluating top faculty researchers and the incentives that motivate them. Scientometrics, 97(3), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0987-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitic, R.R., & Okahana, H. (2021). Don’t count them out: PhD skills development and careers in industry. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 12(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-03-2020-0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molla, T., & Cuthbert, D. (2015). The issue of research graduate employability in Australia: An analysis of the policy framing (1999–2013). Australian Educational Researcher, 42(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0171-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molla, T., & Cuthbert, D. (2019). Calibrating the PhD for industry 4.0: Global concerns, national agendas and Australian institutional responses. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 3(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2019.1637772
   Google Scholar
• Patricio, M.T., & Santos, P. (2019). Collaborative research projects in doctoral programs: A case study in Portugal. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2311–2323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1607282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, C., & Byrne, J. (2014). The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(3), 534–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineault, L., Partridge, T., & Bierstetel, S.J. (2021). Why are we following a 20th century data pedagogy in a 21st century data world. American Psychological Association, https://www.apa.org/topics/research/data-science
   Google Scholar
• Price, D.C., & Money, A.H. (2002). Alternative models for doctoral mentor organisation and research supervision. Mentoring and Tutoring, 10(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1361126022000002446
   Google Scholar
• Reithmeier, R., O’Leary, L., Zhu, X., Dales, C., Abdulkarim, A., Aquil, A., Brouillard, L., Chang, S., Miller, S., & Shi, W. (2019). The 10,000 PhDs project at the University of Toronto: Using employment outcome data to inform graduate education. PLoS One, 14(1), Article e0209898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A.G. (2018). Industry and PhD engagement programs: Inspiring collaboration and driving knowledge exchange. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(4), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1456492
   Google Scholar
• Shmatko, N. (2016). Researchers’ competencies in the coming decade: Attitudes towards and expectations of the Russian innovation system. Foresight (Los Angeles, Calif.), 18(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2014-0014
   Google Scholar
• Sinche, M., Layton, R.L., Brandt, P.D., O'Connell, A.B., Hall, J.D., Freeman, A.M., Harrell, J.R., Cook, J.G., & Brennwald, P.J. (2017). An evidence-based evaluation of transferrable skills and job satisfaction for science PhDs. PLoS One, 12(9), Article e0185023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R.L., Maroney, K., Nelson, K.W., Abel, A.L., & Abel, H.S. (2006). Doctoral programs: Changing high rates of attrition. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development, 45(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2006.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Torka, M. (2020). Change and continuity in Australian doctoral education: PhD completion rates and times (2005-2018). Australian Universities’ Review, 62(2), 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia-Forrester, F. (2019). Internships and the PhD: Is this the future direction of work-integrated learning in Australia? International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 20(4), 389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Vitae. (2013). What do researchers do? Early career progression of doctoral graduates. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/reports/what-do-researchers-do-early-career-progression-2013.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Willson, R., & Julien, H. (2020). Precarious academics: Information practices and challenges Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Canadian Association for Information Science 2020. https://www.cais2020.ca/talk/precarious-academics/
   Google Scholar
• Woolston, C. (2019). Poll reveals fear and joy, contentment and anguish. Nature, 575(7782), 403–405. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood-Ross, L., & Haigh, C. (2014). As others see us: What PhD students say about supervisors. Nurse Researcher, 22(1), https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.1.38.e1274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar