878
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lessons learned from enabling large-scale assessment change: a collaborative autoethnographic study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 844-858 | Received 24 Mar 2023, Accepted 30 Oct 2023, Published online: 07 Dec 2023

References

  • Bayerlein, L., & McGrath, N. (2018). Collaborating for success: An analysis of the working relationship between academics and educational development professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 43(6), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1215417
  • Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the assessment design decisions framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
  • Blalock, A. E., & Akehi, M. (2018). Collaborative autoethnography as a pathway for transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 16(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344617715711
  • Braune, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
  • Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F. W., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collaborative autoethnography. Routledge.
  • Darabi, M., Macaskill, A., & Reidy, L. (2017). A qualitative study of the UK academic role: Positive features, negative aspects and associated stressors in a mainly teaching-focused university. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(4), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1159287
  • Deneen, C., & Boud, D. (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.859654
  • Denshire, S. (2014). On auto-ethnography. Current Sociology, 62(6), 831–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114533339
  • Duffy, J. O., Wickersham-Fish, L., Rademaker, L., & Wetzler, E. (2018). Using collaborative autoethnography to explore online doctoral mentoring: Finding empathy in mentor/protégé relationships. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 57–76. http://www.ejecs.org/index.php/AJQR/article/view/161/104.
  • Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2019). A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: Learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405
  • Hernandez, K. A. C., Chang, H., & Bilgen, W. (2022). Transformative autoethnography for practitioners: Change processes and practices for individuals and groups. Myers Education Press.
  • Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge.
  • Jessop, T. (2019). Changing the narrative: A programme approach to assessment through TESTA. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (2nd ed., pp. 36–49). Routledge.
  • Joughin, G., Dawson, P., & Boud, D. (2017). Improving assessment tasks through addressing our unconscious limits to change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1221–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1257689
  • Jung, I., Omori, S., Dawson, W. P., Yamaguchi, T., & Lee, S. J. (2021). Faculty as reflective practitioners in emergency online teaching: An autoethnography. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00261-2
  • Kezar, A. (2014). Higher education change and social networks: A review of research. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(1), 91–125. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0003
  • Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
  • Little, D., & Green, D. A. (2022). Credibility in educational development: Trustworthiness, expertise, and identification. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 804–819. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1871325
  • Markham, A. N., Harris, A., & Luka, M. E. (2021). Massive and microscopic sense making during COVID-19 times. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(7), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420962477
  • Ngunjiri, F. W., Hernandez, K. A. C., & Chang, H. (2010). Living autoethnography: Connecting life and research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(1), 1–18.
  • Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783–794. https://doi.org/10.2307/259206
  • Reid, M. D., & Sam, A. H. (2021). Reflections on assessment in the wake of change from the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Education, 55(1), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14368
  • Simper, N., Mårtensson, K., Amanda Berry, B., & Maynard, N. (2022). Assessment cultures in higher education: Reducing barriers and enabling change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1016–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1983770
  • Stensaker, B. (2018). Academic development as cultural work: Responding to the organizational complexity of modern higher education institutions. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(4), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1366322
  • Trowler, P., & Bamber, R. (2005). Compulsory higher education teacher training: Joined-up policies, institutional architectures and enhancement cultures. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440500281708
  • Wall, S. S. (2016). Toward a moderate autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 160940691667496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916674966
  • Watermeyer, R., Crick, T., & Knight, C. (2022). Digital disruption in the time of COVID-19: Learning technologists’ accounts of institutional barriers to online learning, teaching and assessment in UK universities. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(2), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1990064