Decarceration and prison release effects on crime: a case study of proposition 47

References

• Allison, P. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bartos, B. J., and C. E. Kubrin. 2018. “Can We Downsize Our Prisons and Jails without Compromising Public Safety? Findings from California’s Prop 47.” Criminology & Public Policy 17 (3): 693–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccaria, C. B. (1764) 1872. An Essay on Crimes and Punishments. By the Marquis Beccaria of Milan. with a Commentary by M. de Voltaire. A New Edition Corrected ed. Albany: W.C. Little & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., and K. Jones. 2015. “Explaining Fixed Effects: Random Effects Modeling of Time-Series Cross-Sectional and Panel Data.” Political Science Research and Methods 3 (1): 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, M., J. Goss, and V. Nguyen. 2019. Recidivism of Felony Offenders in California. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, M., M. Lofstrom, B. Martin, S. Raphael, and V. Nguyen. 2018. The Impact of Proposition 47 on Crime and Recidivism. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Bushway, S. D., and R. Paternoster. 2013. “Desistance from Crime: A Review and Ideas for Moving Forward.” Handbook of Life-Course Criminology: Emerging Trends and Directions for Future Research 213–231.
   Google Scholar
• California Secretary of State. 2014. Statement of Vote. General Election. November 4, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E. A. 2022. “Prisoners in 2021 – Statistical Tables.” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E. A. 2023. “Prisoners in 2022 – Statistical Tables.” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, B. 2019, November 1. “California’s Prop 47 Leads to Rise in Shoplifting, Thefts, Criminal Activity Across State.” Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/us/california-prop-47-shoplifting-theft-crime-statewide.
   Google Scholar
• Chamlin, M. B., H. G. Grasmick, R. J. Bursik, and J. K. Cochran. 1992. “Time Aggregation and Time Lag in Macro-Level Deterrence Research.” Criminology 30 (3): 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01109.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crea, J. 2019, July 19. “Business Owners Upset Over Increase of Shoplifters Due to Prop. 47.” NBC 7 Los Angeles. https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/california-news/business-owners-upset-over-increase-of-shoplifters-due-to-prop-47/133757/.
   Google Scholar
• Crodelle, J., C. Vallejo, M. Schmidtchen, C. M. Topaz, and M. R. D’Orsogna. 2021. Impacts of California Proposition 47 on Crime In Santa Monica, CA. https://do.org/arXiv:2004.14423.
   Google Scholar
• DeFina, R., and L. Hannon. 2010. “For Incapacitation, There Is No Time Like the Present: The Lagged Effects of Prisoner Reentry on Property and Violent Crime Rates.” Social Science Research 39 (6): 1004–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Rivera, P., M. Lofstrom, and S. Raphael. 2019. “The Effect of Sentencing Reform on Crime Rates: Evidence from California’s Proposition 47.” IZA Discussion Papers, No. 12652. Institute of Labor Economics: (IZA), Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. 2020. “Theft Continues to Plague U.S. Retailers – 32nd Annual Retail Theft Survey.” Hayes International. https://hayesinternational.com/2020/06/theft-continues-to-plague-u-s-retailers-32nd-annual-retail-theft-survey/.
   Google Scholar
• Firebaugh, G., C. Warner, and M. Massoglia. 2013. “Fixed Effects, Random Effects, and Hybrid Models for Causal Analysis.” In Handbook of Causal Analysis for Social Research, 1st. editrd by S. L. Morgan. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, B., N. Hogan, E. Wodahl, A. Hass, M. K. Stohr, and E. Lambert. 2014. “Decarceration and Its Possible Effects on Inmates, Staff, and Communities.” Punishment & Society 16 (4): 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514539535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, A., P. Charles, B. McLeod, J. Kjellstrand, and J. Bonsu. 2020. “Were California’s Decarceration Efforts Smart? A Quasi-Experimental Examination of Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities.” Preprint.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, E. R., J. T. Ward, and J. Wartell. 2021. “Tracing the Effects of Reducing Penalties on Crime and Prosecution.” Journal of Criminal Justice 75:101831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2021.101831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, L., and R. DeFina. 2010. “The State of the Economy and the Relationship Between Prisoner Reentry and Crime.” Social Problems 57 (4): 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.4.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judicial Council of California. 2016. “Early Impacts of Proposition 47 on the Courts.” Operations and Programs Division, Criminal Justice Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., and J. C. Barnes. 2008. “Deterrence and Macro-Level Perceptions of Punishment Risks: Is There a “Collective wisdom”?” Crime & Delinquency 59 (7): 1006–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708327569.
   Google Scholar
• Kleck, G., B. Sever, S. Li, and M. Gertz. 2005. “The Missing Link in General Deterrence Research.” Criminology 43 (3): 623–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00019.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovandzic, T. V., J. J. Sloan, and L. M. Vieraitis. 2004. “Striking out” As Crime Reduction Policy: The Impact of “Three strikes Laws on Crime Rates in U.S. Cities.” Justice Quarterly 21 (2): 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laub, J. H., and R. J. Sampson. 2001. “Understanding Desistance from Crime.” Crime and Justice 28:1–69. https://doi.org/10.1086/652208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legislative Analyst’s Office. 2014. “Proposition 47: Criminal Sentences. Misdemeanor Penalties: Initiative Statute.” Sacramento, CA: LAO. Accessed Nov. 4. April 9, 2020. https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2014/prop-47-110414.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Lofstrom, M., B. Martin, and S. Raphael. 2020. Proposition 47’s Impact on Racial Disparity in Criminal Justice Outcomes. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lyster, L. 2021, July 21. Newsom Signs Bill to Combat Crime, Retail Theft Across California. Associated Press. https://ktla.com/news/california/newsom-signs-bill-to-combat-crime-retail-theft-across-california/.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, J., and S. Raphael. 2020. “Effect of Scaling Back Punishment on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Criminal Case Outcomes.” Criminology & Public Policy, Online First 19 (4): 1139–1164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney, A. C., T. B. Neilands, E. Giannella, M. D. Morris, J. Tulsky, and M. M. Glymour. 2019. “Effects of a Voter Initiative on Disparities in Punishment Severity for Drug Offenses Across California Counties.” Social Science & Medicine 230:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., and K. B. Bucklen. 2014. “Recidivism, Redemption, and Desistance: Understanding Continuity and Change in Criminal Offending and Implications for Interventions.” Sociology Compass 8 (4): 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12150.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, E., and J. Ward. 2021, July 14. “After San Francisco Shoplifting Video Goes Viral, Officials Argue Thefts aren’t Rampant.” NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/after-san-francisco-shoplifting-video-goes-viral-officials-argue-thefts-n1273848.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, T. C., and F. T. Cullen. 2005. “Assessing Macro-Level Predictors and Theories of Crime: A Meta-Analysis.” Crime and Justice 32:373–450. https://doi.org/10.1086/655357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphael, S., and M. A. Stoll. 2004. “The Effect of Prison Releases on Regional Crime Rates.” Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2004 (1): 207–255. https://doi.org/10.1353/urb.2004.0011.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, M., and B. Bartos. 2021. “Decarceration, Sanction Severity and Crime: Causal Analysis of Proposition 47 and Property Crime in Los Angeles.” Justice Evaluation Journal 5 (2): 208–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2021.1996207.
   Google Scholar
• Rocque, M. 2015. “The Lost Concept: The (Re) Emerging Link Between Maturation and Desistance from Crime.” Criminology & Criminal Justice 15 (3): 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814547710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saslow, E. 2015, October 10. “A ‘virtual get-out-of-jail-free card.” Wall Street Journal. https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/10/10/prop47/.
   Google Scholar
• Vest, N., O. Johnson, K. Nowotny, and L. Brinkley-Rubinstein. 2021. “Prison Population Reductions and COVID-19: A Latent Profile Analysis Synthesizing Recent Evidence from the Texas State Prison System.” Journal of Urban Health 98 (1): 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00504-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieraitis, L. M., T. K. Kovandzic, and T. B. Marvell. 2007. “The Criminogenic Effects of Imprisonment: Evidence from State Panel Data, 1974-2002.” Criminology & Public Policy 6 (3): 589–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00456.x.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. L. 2004. “The Effect of Three-Strikes Legislation on Serious Crime in California.” Journal of Criminal Justice 32 (4): 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar