A Liveability Framework for Medium to High Density Social and Affordable Housing: An Australian Housing Case Study

References

• AHURI. 2020a. “What has COVID-19 revealed about the liveability of our homes and neighbourhoods?” AHURI Brief. Available from https://www.ahuri.edu.au/policy/ahuri-briefs/what-has-covid-19-revealed-about-the-liveability-of-our-homes-and-neighbourhoods [Accessed 6 July 2020].
   Google Scholar
• AHURI. 2020b. “AHURI announces eight COVID-19 research projects to inform housing policy response to pandemic. "Available from https://www.ahuri.edu.au/news-and-media/news/ahuri-announces-eight-covid-19-research-projects-to-inform-housing-policy-response-to-pandemic [Accessed 15 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R., 2008. The politics of gating (A response to private security ad public space by manzi ad smith-bowers). European journal of spatial development, 6 (7), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Building Codes Board. 2019. Accessible housing. Available from https://www.abcb.gov.au/sites/default/files/resources/2022/Consultation-report-accessible-housing-options-paper.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Australian Building Codes Board, 2020. Building ministers’ meeting communiqué – 27 November 2020. Australia: ABCB.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bringa, O.R. 2019. “Moving Towards the Universally Designed Home: Part 1.” Available from https://www.betterlivingdesign.org/post/design-a-stunning-blog. [Accessed 20 July 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Brisbane Housing Company Limited. 2022. About Us. Available from https://bhcl.com.au/about-bhcl. [Accessed 26 May 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, L., and Hess, D., 2009. Sustainability uptake in housing in metropolitan Australia: An institutional problem, not a technological one. Housing studies, 24 (2), 203–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danford, G.S., and Tauke, B.2001. Universal design New York, New York, center for inclusive design and environmental access, school of architecture and planning. University at Buffalo. The State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Easthope, H., et al. 2020. Improving outcomes for apartment residents and neighbourhoods. AHURI Final Report. Australia: Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., et al. 2014. Change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giap, T.K., Thye, W.W., and Aw, G., 2014. A new approach to measuring the liveability of cities: the global liveable cities index. World review of science, technology and sustainable development, 11 (2), 176–196.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, T., and Belloni, K., 2011. Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building research & information, 39 (3), 239–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, R., 2007. On case study methodology. Open house international, 32 (3), 48–54. doi:10.1108/OHI-03-2007-B0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, J., et al. 2020. Liveable Social and Affordable Higher Density Housing: Review of Literature and Conceptual Framework. Available from https://sbenrc.com.au/app/uploads/2020/11/SBEnrc-1.71-Liveable-Social-and-Affordable-Higher-Density-Housing-Literature-Review.pdfLendlease (2015). Design for dignity guidelines Australia. Available from https://designfordignity.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Design_for_Dignity_Guidelines_Aug_2016.pdf [Accessed 6 July 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D.2003. Universal design New York 2. Centrer for inclusive design & environmental access. University of Buffalo, The State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Livable Housing Australia, 2012. Livable housing design guidelines. Australia: Livable Housing Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maclennan, D., Ong, R., and Wood, G. 2015. Making connections: Housing, productivity and economic development. Ahuri final report; 251. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Minnery, J., and Greenhalgh, E., 2016. Ideas, interests and institutions in affordable housing: A case study of the Brisbane housing company. Auckland.: Australasian Housing Researchers Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., et al., 2020. Sustainable centres of tomorrow: people and place — final industry report, project 1.62. Australia: Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Children and Equality. 2009. Norway universally designed by 2025 - the Norwegian government’s action plan for universal design and increased accessibility 2009-2013. Norway, Norwegian ministry of children and equality. Available from https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/bld/nedsatt-funksjonsevne/norway-universally-designed-by-2025-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, S., et al. 2014. Wellbeing outcomes of lower income renters: a multilevel analysis of area effects: Final Report. Melbourne, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, H., and Gilmour, T., 2010. Transforming Australia’s social housing: pointers from the British stock transfer experience. Urban policy and research, 28 (3), 241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pill, M., et al. 2020. Strategic planning, ‘city deals’ and affordable housing: Final Report 331. Melbourne, Australia Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).
   Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., et al., 2011. Partnership working in the design and delivery of housing policy and programs: final report 163. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).
   Google Scholar
• Queenslanders with Disability Network, 2017. Going for gold - accessible, affordable housing now - QDN position paper on housing for people with disability. Brisbane, Australia: QDN.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Health, 2019. Health and wellbeing strategic framework 2017 to 2026: performance review 2018–19. Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S., Kraatz, J., Caldera, S & Woolcock, G (2022). Creating liveable and accessible social and affordable higher density housing: the case of green square, Brisbane. In: Proceedings of the CIB world building congress (27–30 June 2022), Melbourne, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Rocco, T., and Plakhotnik, M., 2009. Literature reviews, conceptual frameworks, and theoretical frameworks: terms, functions, and distinctions. Human resource development review, 8 (1), 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2018. WHO housing and health guidelines. Available at https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/276001/9789241550376-eng.pdf [Accessed 21 June 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H., Sintusingha, S., and Bajraszewski, R., 2018. Suburban liveability in Melbourne: a narrative approach. In: Conference proceedings of the 52nd international conference of the architectural science association, 771–777.
   Google Scholar