Meaningful Public Accountability in Collaborative Infrastructure Governance: Lessons from Sydney’s Western Parkland City

References

• Amin, A., 2011. Urban planning in an uncertain world. In: Gary Bridge and Sophie Watson, eds. The New Blackwell companion to the city. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 631–642. doi:10.1002/9781444395105.ch55.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and Torfing, J., 2021. Public governance as co-creation: a strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S., Naumann, M., and Moss, T., 2017. Between coproduction and commons: understanding initiatives to reclaim urban energy provision in Berlin and Hamburg. Urban research & practice, 10 (1), 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and Schillemans, T., 2014b. Meaningful accountability. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 673–682.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., and Goodin, R.E., 2014a. Public accountability. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Cheyne, C., 2015. Changing urban governance in New Zealand: public participation and democratic legitimacy in local authority planning and decision-making 1989–2014. Urban policy and research, 33 (4), 416–432. doi:10.1080/08111146.2014.994740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, R., et al., 2023. A systematic literature review of infrastructure governance: cross-sectoral lessons for transformative governance approaches. Journal of planning literature, 38 (1), 70–87. doi:10.1177/08854122221112317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, D., and Meijer, A.J., 2006. Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? Information polity, 11 (2), 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C., and James, B., 2004. An institutional model for land use and transport integration. Urban policy and research, 22 (3), 277–297. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269308.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, T., and Dodson, J. 2018, December. Cost benefit analysis: the state of the art in Australia. In Australian Transport Research Forum (ATRF).
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., and Fay, M., 2010. Current debates on infrastructure policy. In: Michael Spence and Danny Leipziger, eds. Globalization and growth implications for a post-crisis world. Washington, DC: World Bank, 151–193.
   Google Scholar
• Farid Uddin, K., and Piracha, A., 2023. Urban planning as a game of power: the case of New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Habitat international, 133, 102751. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenster, M., 2006. The opacity of transparency. Iowa law review, 91 (3), 885–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P., et al., 2022. City deals and health equity in Sydney, Australia. Health & place, 73, 102711. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., and McManus, P., 2019. Participation in postpolitical times: protesting westconnex in Sydney, Australia. Journal of the American planning association, 85 (3), 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G.A., and Coghill, K., 2007. Accountability in the privatized state. Governance, 20 (4), 675–702. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00377.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter Research Foundation Centre. 2021, 27 August. Independent community commissioner report. Available from: https://www.hrf.com.au/news-events/news/independent-community-commissioner-report [Accessed 20 February].
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., Curtis, C., and Scheurer, J., 2017. Planning transport infrastructure: examining the politics of transport planning in Melbourne, Sydney and Perth. Urban policy and research, 35 (1), 44–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., 2014. Transparency. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 507–524.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M.H., 2014. Accountability, legitimacy, and the court of public opinion. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 632–646. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641253.013.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., 2016. Accountability. In: C. Ansell, and J. Torfing, eds. Handbook on theories of governance. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, C.J., et al., 2019. Breaking down the silos through geodesign – envisioning Sydney’s urban future. Environment and planning B: urban analytics and city science, 46 (8), 1387–1404. doi:10.1177/2399808318812887.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, M., 2021. Governing cities: politics and policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B.S., 2014. Accountable public services. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 307–323.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., 1999. Conceptualizing accountability. In: A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. F. Plattner, eds. The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 11–28.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtes, H.H.M., 2012. Transparantie, icoon van een dolende overheid. The Netherlands: Boom Lemma Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, J.Z., Andres, L.A., and Dragoiu, G., 2009. Crisis in Latin America: infrastructure investment, employment and the expectations of stimulus. Journal of infrastructure development, 1 (2), 111–131. doi:10.1177/09749306090010.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, G., and Legacy, C., 2021. Locating the public interest in mega infrastructure planning: the case of Sydney’s West Connex. Urban studies, 58 (4), 826–844. doi:10.1177/0042098020927835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M., 2009. Delivering transportation infrastructure through public-private partnerships: planning concerns. Journal of the American planning association, 76 (1), 43–58. doi:10.1080/01944360903329295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., Atkinson, R., and Martins, M.L.R., 2020. Hybrid contractual landscapes of governance: generation of fragmented regimes of public accountability through urban regeneration. Environment and planning C: politics and space, 39 (2), 371–392. doi:10.1177/2399654420932577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P.E., 1992. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: toward a social contingency model. In: Mark Zanna and James Olson, eds. Advances in experimental social psychology. Burlingon: Elsevier, 331–376.
   Google Scholar
• Vibert, F., 2014. The need for a systemic approach. In: M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, eds. The Oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 655–660.
   Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K., and Hammerschmid, G., 2017. Infrastructure governance as political choice. In: Kai Wegrich, Genia Kostka, and Gerhard Hammerschmid, eds. The governance of infrastructure. First Edition Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21–42.
   Google Scholar