Emergency or Not? Dealing with Borderline Cases in Emergency Police Calls

References

• Cromdal, J., Landqvist, H., Persson-Thunqvist, D., & Osvaldsson, K. (2012). Finding out what’s happened: Two procedures for opening emergency calls. Discourse Studies, 14(4), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612439960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802028613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 470–520). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional setting (pp. 3–65). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P., & Walker, T. (2010). Citizens’ emergency calls: Requesting assistance in calls to the police. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.), The routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp. 96–110). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fele, G. (2014). Requesting help with null or limited knowledge. Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts, 25, 139. https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R., & Housley, W. (2015). Advances in membership categorisation analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, A., & Parmer, P. (1999). Misplaced mistrust: The collaborative construction of doubt in 911 emergency calls. Symbolic Interaction, 22(4), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1999.22.4.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Martinez, E., & Drew, P. (2021). Informings as recruitment in nurses’ intrahospital telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, T. (2006). ‘Will you or can’t you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(7), 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. (2017). Transcribing for social research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1988). Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods (pp. 127–144). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27(3), 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500019990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. (2006). Accounting for the visit: Patients’ reasons for seeking medical care. In J. Heritage & D. Maynard (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interactions between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 48–85). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horton-Salway, M. (2007). The ‘ME Bandwagon’ and other labels: Constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 895–914. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X173456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, A., & Antaki, C. (2020). Police call-takers first substantive question projects the outcome of the call. Applied Linguistics, 41(5), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevoe-Feldman, H. (2019). Inside the emergency service call-center: Reviewing thirty years of language and social interaction research. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevoe-Feldman, H., & Iversen, C. (2022). Approaching institutional boundaries: Comparative conversation analysis of practices for assisting suicidal callers in emergency and suicide helpline calls. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevoe-Feldman, H., & Pomerantz, A. (2018). Critical timing of actions for transferring 911 calls in a wireless call center. Discourse Studies, 20(4), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618756182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T. (2013). Dispatching emergency assistance: Callers’ claims of entitlement and call takers’ decisions. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.810401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, D. W. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 448–495. https://doi.org/10.1086/229785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. (2019). Category accounts: Identity and normativity in sequences of action. Language in Society, 48(4), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35(5), 677–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2007). Rights and responsibilities in calls for help: The case of the mountain glade fire. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 40(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701331232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles, J. S. (2022). Managing moral category implications of former drug addiction. Discourse & Society, 33(4), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221088130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G., & Stivers, T. (2021). Category sensitive action in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 84(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272520944595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207–234). University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2004). On dispensability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), 95–149. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A., Stevanovic & Anssi Peräkylä. (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2009). Accomplishing social action with identity categories: Mediating and policing neighbour disputes. Theorizing Identities and Social Action, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246942_6.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. H. (2003). Mothers, single women and sluts: Gender, morality and membership categorization in neighbour disputes. Feminism & Psychology, 13(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353503013003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennent, E. (2021). ‘I’m calling in regard to my son’: Entitlement, obligation, and opportunity to seek help for others. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 870–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1997). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(4), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Agne, R. R. (2002). ‘I just need to ask somebody some questions’: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls. In J. Cotteril (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 75–90). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. (2002). When questioning turns to face threat: An interactional sensitivity in 911 call-taking. Western Journal of Communication, 66(2), 129–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374730
   Google Scholar
• Turowetz, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2016). Category attribution as a device for diagnosis: Fitting children to the autism spectrum. Sociology of Health and Illness, 38(4), 610–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R. (2015). De-reifying categories. In R. Fitzgerald & W. Housley (Eds.), Advances in membership categorisation Analysis (pp. 23–50). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J., Zimmerman, D. H., & Whalen, M. R. (1988). When words fail: A single case analysis. Social Problems, 35(4), 335–362. https://doi.org/10.2307/800591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. (1990). Describing trouble: Practical epistemology in citizen calls to the police. Language in Society, 19(4), 465–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, M. R., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. (1984). Talk and its occasion: The case of calling the police. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications (pp. 210–228). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. H. (1992). Achieving context: Openings in emergency calls. Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, 35, 51. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1308.
   Google Scholar