The development of imagined interactions in online text-based initial interactions

References

• Adamcyzk, K., Janowicz, K., & Mrozowicz-Wrońska, M. (2022). Never-married single adults’ experiences with online dating websites and mobile applications: A qualitative content analysis. New Media & Society, 146144482210978. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221097894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., Honeycutt, J. M., & Vickery, A. J. (2013). An analysis of the correspondence between imagined interaction attributes and functions. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, G. W. (2022). Imagine me and you, I do: Characteristics and functions of imagined interactions during online dating. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 41(3), 323–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366211050644
   Google Scholar
• Coduto, K. D., Vendemia, M. A., Viverette, S., & Williams, E. (2022). Exploring sexual, romantic, and platonic features and functions of the imagined interactions framework. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 42(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/02762366221089279
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2011). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811410395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale [ Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t17935-000
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2009). Symbolic interdependence, imagined interaction, and relationship quality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 28(4), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.28.4.b
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2010). Imagine that: Studies in imagined interactions. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2015). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 75–87). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2020). Imagined interactions and inner speech. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236619869163
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., & Sheldon, P. (2018). Scripts and communication for relationships. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Vickery, A. J., & Hatcher, L. C. (2015). The daily use of imagined interaction features. Communication Monographs, 82(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.953965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. C., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure-intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo, V. Y., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2021). Meeting by text or video-chat: Effects on confidence and performance. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3, 100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100054
   Google Scholar
• Sharabi, L. L., & Dykstra-Devette, T. A. (2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3389–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidwell, N. D., Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2012). Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm. Personal Relationships, 20, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar