Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in skeletal Class I malocclusion with variable degrees of deep overbite and open bite

References

• Katsavrias EG, Halazonetis DJ. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(3):337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alyafrusee ES, Alhammadi MS, Almaqrami BS, et al. Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class I malocclusion with variable degrees of overbite and overjet. CRANIO®. 2022;1:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Milosevic A. Occlusion: 1. Terms, mandibular movement and the factors of occlusion. Dent Update. 2003;30(7):359–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Zhou W, Wu Y, et al. The relation between incisal guidance angle and the growth and development of temporomandibular joint: a multi-cross-sectional retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuyler CH. The function and importance of incisal guidance in oral rehabilitation 1963. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86(3):219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlberg V, Schwahn C, Gesch D, et al. The association between anterior crossbite, deepbite and temporomandibular joint morphology validated by magnetic resonance imaging in an adult non-patient group. Ann Anat. 2012;194(4):339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelly AA, Petras JC, Boffa J. Condylar position and Class II deep-bite, no-overjet malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96(5):428–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Solberg WK, Hollender L, et al. Relationship of mandibular condylar position to dental occlusion factors in an asymptomatic population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91(3):200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koak JY, Kim KN, Heo SJ. A study on the mandibular movement of anterior openbite patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27(9):817–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S, Ozkan H, et al. Comparison of deep bite and open bite cases: normative data for condylar positions, paths and radiographic appearances. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(3):213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larheim TA, Abrahamsson AK, Kristensen M, et al. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44(1):20140235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network and orofacial pain special interest group. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28(1):6–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae JM, Park JH, Tai K, et al. Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(2):224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger A, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;62(6):719–927.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broderson SP. Anterior guidance–the key to successful occlusal treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;39(4):396–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlueter BA. Cone beam computed tomography three-dimensional reconstruction for evaluation of the mandibular condyle [ Doctoral dissertation], Saint Louis University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Katayama K, Yamaguchi T, Sugiura M, et al. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakawaki T, Yamaguchi T, Tomita D, et al. Evaluation of mandibular volume classified by vertical skeletal dimensions with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(6):949–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsavrias EG, Dibbets JM. The growth of articular eminence height during craniofacial growth period. CRANIO®. 2001;19(1):13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granados JI. The influence of the loss of teeth and attrition on the articular eminence. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;42(1):78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türp JC, Schindler H. The dental occlusion as a suspected cause for TMDs: epidemiological and etiological considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):502–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein BH. Temporomandibular disorders: a review of current understanding. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(4):379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Fattah RA. Optimum temporomandibular joint (TMJ) condylar position. Today’s FDA: Official Monthly Journal of the Florida Dental Association. 1989;1(3):1C–3C.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakke M, Michler L. Temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with anterior open bite and craniomandibular disorders. Scand J Dent Res. 1991;99(3):219–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li JN, Kanno ZS, Soma K. Study of occlusal force on female open bite patients with temporomandibular disorders. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007;25(6):536–539. Chinese.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dos Santos J Jr, de Rijk WG. Vectorial analysis of the instantaneous equilibrium of forces between incisal and condylar guidances. CRANIO®. 1992;10(4):305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, et al. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996;66(1):27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkistani KA, Alkayyal MA, Abbassy MA, et al. Comparison of occlusal bite force distribution in subjects with different occlusal characteristics. CRANIO®. 2020;19:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(6):1063–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberg A, Westesson PL. Steepness of articular eminence and movement of the condyle and disk in asymptomatic temporomandibular joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86(2):152–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson WB, Bates RE Jr. The effects of the angle of the articular eminence on anterior disk displacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49(4):554–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeliler N, Dinçer M, Soylu R. The biomechanical relationship between incisor and condylar guidances in deep bite and normal cases. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(5):430–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokri A, Zarch HH, Hafezmaleki F, et al. Comparative assessment of condylar position in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and asymptomatic patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56(1):81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağlayan F, Sümbüllü MA, Akgül HM. Associations between the articular eminence inclination and condylar bone changes, condylar movements, and condyle and fossa shapes. Oral Radiol. 2014;30(1):84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullinger AG, Seligman DA. Quantification and validation of predictive values of occlusal variables in temporomandibular disorders using a multifactorial analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(1):66–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredini D, Peretta R, Guarda-Nardini L, et al. Predictive value of combined clinically diagnosed bruxism and occlusal features for TMJ pain. CRANIO®. 2010;28(2):105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angel JL. Factors in temporomandibular joint form. Am J Anat. 1948;83(2):223–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boering G. Anatomical and physiological considerations regarding the temporomandibular joint. Int Dent J. 1979;29(4):245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesner SE. Temporomandibular reactions to occlusal anomalies. J Am Dent Assoc. 1938;25:1938–1953.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada K, Tsuruta A, Hanada K, et al. Morphology of the articular eminence in temporomandibular joints and condylar bone change. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(5):438–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnesen L, Svensson P. Temporomandibular disorders and psychological status in adult patients with a deep bite. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(6):621–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton RJ. Changes in articular eminence morphology with dental function. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1981;54(4):439–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Li C, Wang Z, et al. Assessment of osseous morphology of temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic participants with chewing-side preference. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;42(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanne K, Tanaka E, Sakuda M. Stress distributions in the TMJ during clenching in patients with vertical discrepancies of the craniofacial complex. J Orofac Pain. 1995;9(2):153–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nickel JC, Iwasaki LR, Gonzalez YM, et al. Mechanobehavior and ontogenesis of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res. 2018;97(11):1185–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavicek M, Slavicek R. The masticatory organ. Functions and dysfunctions. 1st ed. Kloster Neuenburg, Austria: Gamma; 2000.
   Google Scholar