References
- Clough, M. P. 2006. “Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction.” Science & Education 15 (5): 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7.
- Haik, Y., S. Sivaloganathan, and T. M. Shahin. 2015. Engineering design process. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
- Kent-Schneider, I., and J. Kruse. 2020. “Using a Simple Pendulum Investigation to Develop Students’ History and Nature of Science Knowledge.” The Physics Teacher 58 (9): 628–631. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0002727.
- Kruse, J., H. Edgerly, J. Easter, and J. Wilcox. 2017. “Myths about the Nature of Technology and Engineering.” The Science Teacher 084 (05): 39–43. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst17_084_05_39.
- Kruse, J., I. Kent-Schneider, S. Voss, K. Zacharski, and M. Rockefeller. 2021. “Investigating Student Nature of Science Views as Reflections of Authentic Science: Degrees of Contextualisation and the Teachers’ Role.” Science & Education 30 (5): 1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00231-0.
- Kruse, J., I. Kent-Schneider, S. Voss, K. Zacharski, and M. Rockefeller. 2022. “Investigating the Effect of NOS Question Type on Students’ NOS Responses.” Research in Science Education 52 (1): 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09923-z.
- Pleasants, J. 2023. “Rethinking the Nature of Engineering: Attending to the Social Context of Engineering.” Science & Education 2023: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00445-4.
- Voss, S., J. Kruse, and I. Kent-Schneider. 2022. “Comparing Student Responses to Convergent, Divergent, and Evaluative Nature of Science Questions.” Research in Science Education 52 (4): 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10009-7.
- Wilcox, J., J. Kruse, and S. Voss. 2019. “Rethinking Classic Engineering Activities: Embedding NGSS and Natures of Technology and Engineering to Improve Student Learning.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 79 (2): 1–7.