Livestock and Pets: Validation of 72 Pairs of Photographs Depicting Dogs, Cats, Miniature Rabbits, Pigs, and Cattle

References

• Archer, D., Iritani, B., Kimes, D. D., & Barrios, M. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arluke, A. B. (1988). Sacrificial symbolism in animal experimentation: Object or pet? Anthrozoös, 2(2), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279389787058091
   Google Scholar
• Auger, B., & Amiot, C. E. (2017). Testing and extending the pets as ambassadors hypothesis: The role of contact with pets and recategorization processes in predicting positive attitudes toward animals. Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 5, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2017.0005
   Google Scholar
• Bacci, N., Davimes, J., Steyn, M., & Briers, N. (2021). Development of the Wits Face Database: An African database of high-resolution facial photographs and multimodal closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings. F1000Research, 10, 131. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50887.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211424291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batres, C., & Shiramizu, V. (2023). Examining the “attractiveness halo effect” across cultures. Current Psychology, 42(29), 25515–25519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03575-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsare, A., & Vanak, A. T. (2020). Modelling the challenges of managing free-ranging dog populations. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 18874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75828-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev, D. K. (1979). Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity, 70(5), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2016). Pet face: Mechanisms underlying human–animal relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, J. M., Bovenkerk, B., Feindt, P. H., & Van Dam, Y. K. (2018). The quantified animal: Precision livestock farming and the ethical implications of objectification. Food Ethics, 2, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-018-00029-x
   Google Scholar
• Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(1), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones, E. M., Marshall, P. H., & Mangano, S. (2022). Perceived aggressive tendencies of, and functional attitudes towards, selected breeds of dogs. Society & Animals, 31(5–6), 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-bja10073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, M. (2023). The top most popular pets: A comprehensive guide to choosing the perfect companion. https://worldanimalfoundation.org/animals/most-popular-pets/
   Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-005-2743-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhont, K., Hodson, G., & Leite, A. C. (2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023a). Meat production by livestock type, World, 1961 to 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-meat-production-by-livestock-type
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023b). Number of pigs, 1961 to 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/pig-livestock-count-heads?tab=table&facet=none
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023c). Number of cattle, 1961 to 2021. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cattle-livestock-count-heads?tab=table
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golle, J., Lisibach, S., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2013). Sweet puppies and cute babies: Perceptual adaptation to babyfacedness transfers across species. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Redondo, P., & Contreras-Chacón, G. M. (2012). Perceptions among university students in Seville (Spain) of the rabbit as livestock and as a companion animal. World Rabbit Science, 20(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2012.1147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, S. D. (2008). Personality in non-human animals. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 985–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00087.x
   Google Scholar
• Gradidge, S., Harvey, A. J., McDermott, D. T., & Zawisza, M. (2021). Humankind’s best friend vs. humankind’s best food: Perceptions of identifiable dog vs. pig victims. Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 12(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2021.0010
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., Abbott, J. T., & Hsu, A. S. (2016). Exploring human cognition using large image databases. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(3), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D., & Tolba, R. H. (2015). Ethics in animal-based research. European Surgical Research, 55(1–2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1159/000377721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki, T. K., & Ross, L. P. (2021). A body-to-mind perspective on social connection: Physical warmth potentiates brain activity to close others and subsequent feelings of social connection. Emotion, 21(4), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, M. (2009). Why we love dogs, eat pigs, and wear cows: An introduction to carnism. Conari Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kringelbach, M. L., Stark, E. A., Alexander, C., Bornstein, M. H., & Stein, A. (2016). On cuteness: Unlocking the parental brain and beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(7), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughnan, S., Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2014). The psychology of eating animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414525781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeux, L., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). It’s not just being popular, it’s knowing it, too: The role of self-perceptions of status in the associations between peer status and aggression. Social Development, 17(4), 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00474.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, B. M. A., Pfeiler, T. M., Patterson, M. D., & Milburn, M. A. (2017). The Carnism Inventory: Measuring the ideology of eating animals. Appetite, 113, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemyjska, A., Cantarero, K., Byrka, K., & Bilewicz, M. (2018). Too humanlike to increase my appetite: Disposition to anthropomorphize animals relates to decreased meat consumption through empathic concern. Appetite, 127, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palagi, E., Celeghin, A., Tamietto, M., Winkielman, P., & Norscia, I. (2020). The neuroethology of spontaneous mimicry and emotional contagion in human and non-human animals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 111, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peden, R. S., Camerlink, I., Boyle, L. A., Loughnan, S., Akaichi, F., & Turner, S. P. (2020). Belief in pigs’ capacity to suffer: An assessment of pig farmers, veterinarians, students, and citizens. Anthrozoös, 33(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2020.1694304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Possidónio, C., Graça, J., Piazza, J., & Prada, M. (2019). Animal images database: Validation of 120 images for human–animal studies. Animals, 9(8), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., Rosado, P., & Roser, M. (2017). Meat and dairy production. https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production
   Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146, 104511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serpell, J. A. (1996). In the company of animals: A study of human–animal relationships. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shriver, E. R., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Lanter, J. R. (2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. (2001). A neural basis for expert object recognition. Psychological Science, 12(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarr, M. J., & Cheng, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00010-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. S., Hudson, C. D., Huxley, J. N., Kaler, J., Robinson, R. S., Woad, K. J., Bollard, N., Gibbons, J., & Green, M. J. (2022). A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of indoor living space on dairy cow production, reproduction and behaviour. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 3849. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07826-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorn, P., Howell, T. J., Brown, C., & Bennett, P. C. (2015). The canine cuteness effect: Owner-perceived cuteness as a predictor of human–dog relationship quality. Anthrozoös, 28(4), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2015.1069992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townley, C. (2010). Animals as friends. Between the Species, 13(10), 3. https://doi.org/10.15368/bts.2010v13n10.3
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., Schönborn, S., Greifeneder, R., & Vetter, T. (2018). The Basel Face Database: A validated set of photographs reflecting systematic differences in Big Two and Big Five personality dimensions. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0193190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, M., Caviola, L., Kahane, G., & Bloom, P. (2021). Children prioritize humans over animals less than adults do. Psychological Science, 32(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620960398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorzinski, J. L. (2017). The cognitive basis of individual recognition. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zickfeld, J. H., Kunst, J. R., & Hohle, S. M. (2018). Too sweet to eat: Exploring the effects of cuteness on meat consumption. Appetite, 120, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar