Deciphering the Commodity: The Social Code of Value

References

• Balibar, É. 2011. “Marx’s ‘Two Discoveries.’” Actuel Marx, no. 50: 44–60.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1986. Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Baudrillard, J. 1976. “Toward a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign.” SubStance 5 (15):111–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bologh, R. 2009. Dialectical Phenomenology: Marx’s Method. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charusheela, S. 2005. Structuralism and Individualism in Economic Analysis: The “Contractionary Devaluation Debate” in Development Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004. “How Do We Recognize Structuralism?” In Desert Islands and Other Texts, 1953–1974, by. G. Deleuze, 170–92. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Sicilia, A. S., and S. B. Rojas. 2018. “Production = Signification: Towards a Semiotic Materialism.” Language Sciences, no. 70: 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• Echeverria, B. 2014. “‘Use-value’: Ontology and Semiotics.” Radical Philosophy, no. 188: 24–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelskirchen, H. 2008. “On the Clear Comprehension of Political Economy.” In Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science, ed. R. Groff, 242–59. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engster, F., and O. Schlaudt. 2018. “Alfred Sohn-Rethel: Real Abstraction and the Unity of Commodity-Form and Thought Form.” In The Sage Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory, ed. B. Best, W. Bonefeld, and O. Chris, 284–301. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 1966. “Form and Substance in Glossematics.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 10 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gandler, S. 2018. “Critical Theory and Semiotics: Contributions from Latin America to a Marxist Discussion.” Open Cultural Studies 2 (1): 136–50.
   Google Scholar
• Goux, J. J. 1990. Symbolic Economies: After Marx and Freud. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M. 2012. An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s “Capital.” New York: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M. 2021. How to Read Marx’s “Capital”: Commentary and Explanations on the Beginning Chapters. New York: Monthly Review.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmslev, L. 1969. Prolegomena to a Theory of Language. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, G. 2013. Value in Marx: The Persistence of Value in a More-than-Capitalist World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2013. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. E. 2011. “Value for Money? Putting Marx through the Mill.” Language Sciences 33 (4): 689–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatani, K. (1974) 2020. Marx: Towards the Centre of Possibility. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2000. “From Commodity Production to Sign Production: A Triple Triangle Model for Marx’s Semiotics and Peirce’s Economics.” Semiotica 132 (1–2): 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kockelman, P. 2006. “A Semiotic Ontology of the Commodity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 16 (1): 76–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kordela, A. K. 2006. “Capital: At Least It Kills Time.” Rethinking Marxism 18 (4): 539–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. L. 2022. “Real Abstraction.” In The Sage Handbook of Marxism, ed. B. Skeggs, S. R. Farris, A. Toscano, and S. Bromberg, 593–608. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1966. Le langage et la société. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1971. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston: Beacon.
   Google Scholar
• Madra, Y. M., and C. Özselçuk. 2010. “Enjoyment as an Economic Factor: Reading Marx with Lacan.” Subjectivity 3 (3): 323–47.
   Google Scholar
• Malabou, C. 2002. “Economy of Violence, Violence of Economy (Derrida and Marx).” In vol. 3 of Jacques Derrida: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, ed. Z. Direk and L. Lawlor, 180–98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1975–2001. Collected Works, by K. Marx and F. Engels. 50 vols. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1976. “Capital, Volume 1: First Chapter, First German Edition of 1867.” In Value: Studies by Karl Marx, trans. and ed. A. Dragstedt, 7–40. London: New Park.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1990. Capital. Vol. 1. Trans. B. Fowkes. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen and West.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özselçuk, C., and Y. M. Madra 2021. “In the Void of Formalization: The Homology between Surplus Value and Surplus Jouissance.” In A Place More Void, eds. P. Kingsbury and A. J. Secor, 267-84. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, J. E. 2019. From Aristotle to Marx: Aristotelianism in Marxist Social Ontology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci, A. 2019. “Unequal Exchange in the Age of Globalization.” Review of Radical Political Economics 51 (2): 225–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci, A. 2021. Value and Unequal Exchange in International Trade: The Geography of Global Capitalist Exploitation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. 2004. “Value, Abstract Labor, and Exchange Equivalence.” In The New Value Controversy and the Foundations of Economics, ed. A. Freeman, A. Kliman, and J. Wells, 107–134. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. 2005. “Quantifying Abstract Labor: ‘Aliquot Part’ Reasoning in Marx’s Value Theory.” Research in Political Economy, no. 22: 137–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi-Landi, F. 1992. Between Signs and Non-signs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi-Landi, F. 2017. Linguistics and Economics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I. 2017. “Essays on Marx’s Theory of Money (1926–8).” In Responses to Marx’s Capital: From Rudolf Hilferding to Isaak Illich Rubin, ed. R. B. Day and D. F. Gaido, 619–727. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. de. 2011. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Screpanti, E. 2017. “Karl Marx on Wage Labor: From Natural Abstraction to Formal Subsumption.” Rethinking Marxism 29 (4): 511–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siertsema, B. 2012. A Study of Glossematics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn-Rethel, A. 1978. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn-Rethel, A. 1990. Das Geld, die bare Münze des Apriori. Berlin: K. Wagenbach.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1987. “Speculations on Reading Marx: After Reading Derrida.” In Post-structuralism and the Question of History, ed. D. Attridge, G. Bennington, and R. Young, 30–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes, P. 1974. “Aristotle’s Concept of Matter and Its Relation to Modern Concepts of Matter.” Synthese, no. 28: 27–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tairako, T. 2017. “Versachlichung and Verdinglichung: Basic Categories of Marx’s Theory of Reification and Their Logical Construction.” Hitotsubashi 48 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tairako, T. 2018. “Reification-Thingification and Alienation: Basic Concepts of Marx’s Critique of Political Economy and Practical Materialism.” Hitotsubashi 49 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Tomšič, S. 2015. The Capitalist Unconscious: Marx and Lacan. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, P. O. 2014. “Baudrillard’s Theory of Value: A Baby in the Marxist Bath Water?” Rethinking Marxism 26 (3): 382–97.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 2017. “The Varieties of Surplus.” Problemi International 1 (1): 7–32.
   Google Scholar