Impartiality or Individualization? Imprisoned Women’s Discourses of (In)Justice

REFERENCES

• Adlerstein, D. M. (2001). In need of correction: The “iron triangle” of the prison litigation reform act. Columbia Law Review, 101(7), 1681. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2016). A shared sentence: The devastating toll of parental incarceration on kids, families and communities. Baltimore, MD. https://assets.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/aecf-asharedsentence-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, A. (2017, August 17). More women in California prisons are trying to kill themselves. What can the state do to protect them? The Sacramento Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, A. (2018, July 24). Sexual misconduct reports spike in California prisons. The Sacramento Bee.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, S, (2022, December 28). Ex-California prison officer accused of sexual misconduct with nearly two dozen inmate. CBS News. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/ex-california-prison-officer-accused-of-sexual-misconduct/.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Pickett, J. T., Amin, D. M., Golden, K., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., & Bedard, L. (2015). Shared race/ethnicity, court procedural justice, and self-regulating beliefs: A study of female offenders. Law & Society Review, 49(2), 433–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., Pelfrey, W. V., Bedard, L. E., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., & Golden, K. (2014). Female Inmates’ Procedural Justice Perceptions of the Police and Courts. Female inmates’ procedural justice perceptions of the police and courts: Is there a spill-over of police effects? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813497479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, R. A. (2011). Special Report: CDCR’s revised inmate appeals process leaves key problems unaddressed. Office of the Inspector General. https://www.oig.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Special-Report-on-CDCRs-Revised-Inmate-Appeal-Process-Leaves-Key-Problems-Unaddressed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. J., Rantala, R. R., & Rexroat, J. (2014). Sexual victimization reported by correctional authorities, 2009–2011. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, K. A., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Eichelsheim, V. I., Van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2015). Procedural justice, anger, and prisoners’ misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belitz, H. (2018). A right without a remedy: Sexual abuse in prison and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 53(1), 291–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. R. (1965). Impartiality and intellectual virtue. The Philosophical Quarterly, 15(60), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217599
   Google Scholar
• Bierie, D. M. (2013). Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates. (2000-2007). Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 19(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice. (2022). https://nicic.gov/gender-responsive-strategies-research-practice-and-guiding-principles-women-offenders.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, M. (1999). Engendering resistance: Agency and power in women’s prisons. Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, J., Stroop, J., Zimmer, S., Berzofsky, M. (2020). Drug use, dependence, and abuse among state prisoners and jail inmates, 2007–2009. Bureau of Justice Statistics: U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/dudaspji0709.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01282.x
   Google Scholar
• Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Gender, race and urban policing: The experience of African American youth. Gender & Society, 20(4), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206287727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton-Smith, I., & McCarthy, D. J. (2016). Prison legitimacy and procedural fairness: A multilevel examination of prisoners in England and Wales. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1029–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2015.1023215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, K. S. (2007). Impunity: Sexual abuse in women’s prisons. Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review, 42, 45–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of State Audits. (2010). Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act: State agencies do not fully comply with the Act, and local governments could do more to address their clients’ needs. (Report No. 2010-106). https://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2010-106.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. H. (2022). Understanding how in-prison experiences influence female offenders’ maladjustment to prison. Justice Quarterly, 39(1), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2019.1703026
   Google Scholar
• Calavita, K., & Jenness, V. (2013). Inside the pyramid of disputes: Naming problems and filing grievances in California prisons. Social Problems, 70(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.50
   Google Scholar
• Calavita, K., & Jenness, V. (2015). Appealing to justice: Prisoner grievances, rights, and carceral logic. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2009). California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Adult Programs Annual Report, Division of Addiction and Recovery Services. https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/publications/california-department-of-corrections-and-rehabilitation-adult-programs-annual-report-jun-2009/
   Google Scholar
• Capeheart, L., & Milovanovic, D. (2007). Social justice: Theories, issues and movements. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, J. D., Tyler, T. R., & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 22(3), 483–508. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M. (1989). Girls’ crime and woman’s place: Toward a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 35(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128789035001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Merlo, A. V. (2015). Global war on girls? Policing girls’ sexuality and criminalizing their victimization. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(1–2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1026776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (1998). Girls, delinquency and juvenile justice. West/Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (2014). Girls, delinquency and juvenile justice. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman v. Brown (2013). No. CIV S-90-520 LKK/JFM(PC).
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. L., Smith, S. G., Tusher, C. P., & Raiford, J. (2005). Self-reports of traumatic events in a random sample of incarcerated women. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(1–2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v16n01_05
   Google Scholar
• Cremer, D. D., & Tyler, T. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (2012). From private violence to mass incarceration: Thinking intersectionally about women, race, and social control. UCLA Law Review, 59(6), 1418–1472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, R., & Choi, S. Y. P. (2009). Getting even or getting equal? Retributive desires and transitional justice. Political Psychology, 30(2), 161–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00687.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, L. M. (1999). “One female prisoner is of more trouble than twenty males”: Women convicts in Illinois prisons, 1835-1896. Journal of Social History, 32(4), 907–930. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh/32.4.907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. (2020). Incarcerated women: Reproductive healthcare concerns silenced by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Upper Level Writing Requirement Research Papers. 38. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/stu_upperlevel_papers/38.
   Google Scholar
• Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming and claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenster, A., & Schlanger, M. (2021). Slamming the courthouse door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Prison Policy Initiative, April.
   Google Scholar
• Filler, M., & Greenfield, D. (2020). A wrong without a right? Overcoming the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s injury requirement in solitary confinement cases. Northwestern University Law Review, 115(1), 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, N. J., Crystal, D. S., & Watanabe, H. (2001). Commonsense notions of unfairness in Japan and the United States. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(2), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.2.345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaze, L. E., & Maruschak, L. M. (2010). Parents in prison and their minor children. Bureau of Justice Statistics: U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/parents-prison-and-their-minor-children-survey-prison-inmates-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Grella, C. E., Lovinger, K., & Warda, U. S. (2013). Relationships among trauma exposure, familial characteristics, and PTSD: A case-control study of women in prison and in the general population. Women & Criminal Justice, 23(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2013.743376
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, C. W. (1999). Prior abuse reported by inmates and probationers: Bureau of Justice Statistics selected findings. U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/parip.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hauenstein, N. M., McGonigle, T., & Flinder, S. W. (2001). A meta-analysis of the relationship between procedural justice and distributive justice: Implications for justice research. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 13(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014482124497
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, E. H., Henderson, L., & Reed, C. (2018). An unjust burden: The disparate treatment of Black Americans in the criminal justice system. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/for-the-record-unjust-burden-racial-disparities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (1996). All too familiar: Sexual abuse of women in US. State prisons. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports/1996/Us1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/mhppji.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jenness, V., & Calavita, K. (2018). “It depends on the outcome”: Prisoners, grievances, and perceptions of procedural justice. Law & Society Review, 52(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson v. Darr, 10cv2334-WQH-POR U.S. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., Maguire, E. R., & Kuhns, J. B. (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law & Society Review, 48(4), 947–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. C., Mennicke, A. M., Feely, M., & Tripodi, S. J. (2018). The relationship between interpersonal victimization and women’s criminal sentencing: A latent class analysis. Women & Criminal Justice, 2018, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2018.1441774
   Google Scholar
• Konradt, U., Okimoto, T., Garbers, Y., & Otte, K. (2020). The shape of justice repair: Asymmetric nonlinear retributive and restorative justice effects to unfair supervisor treatment. International Journal of Conflict and Management, 31(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2019-0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., Lissak, R. I., & Conlon, D. E. (1983). Decision control and process control effects on procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(4), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2019-0096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loper, A. B., Carlson, L. W., Levitt, L., & Scheffel, K. (2009). Parenting stress, alliance, child contact, and adjustment of imprisoned mothers and fathers. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(6), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670903081300
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, C. A. (2006). Are women human? And other international dialogues. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maiese, M. (2004, January). Procedural justice: Knowledge base essay. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/procedural_justice/?nid=1016.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Gómez, A. (2018). Language, translation and interpreting policies in prisons: Protecting the rights of speakers of non-official languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 251, 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Maruschak, L. M., & Bronson, J. (2021). Parents in prison and their minor children. U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmcspi16st.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mauer, M., & Huling, T. (1995). Young black Americans and the criminal justice system: Five years later. The Sentencing Project. https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Young-Black-Americans-and-the-Criminal-Justice-System-Five-Years-Later.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milovanovic, D. (2003). An introduction to the sociology of law. Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M., & Schram, P. J. (2002). The prison experience: Special issues of women in prison. Waveland Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, B. (2003). Differences with a distinction: Women offenders and criminal justice practice. In B. E. Bloom (Ed.), Gendered Justice: Addressing female offenders (pp. 25–43). Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. C. (2002). Female inmates living in fear: Sexual abuse by correctional officers in the District of Columbia. Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, 10(2), 443–477.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spousal assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehlmann, J. (2005). Incarcerated mothers’ contact with children, perceived family relationships, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. (1995). Women in corrections: Custody and the “caring ethic. In M. V. Merlo & J. M. Pollock (Eds.), Women, law & social control (p. 97–116). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Prison Law Office. (2017). Administrative appeals: How to file an administrative appeal challenging CDCR actions or policies. https://prisonlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/AdminAppeals-June-2020.pdf\
   Google Scholar
• Rafter, N. H. (1990). Partial justice: Women, prisons, and social control. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rathbone, C. (2005). A world apart: Women, prison and life behind bars. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Reddington, F. P., & Kreisel, B. W. (2017). Sexual assault: The victims, perpetrators, and the criminal justice system. Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisig, M. D., & Mesko, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802089768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richie, B. E. (2015). Arrested justice: Black women, violence and America’s prison nation. NewYork University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogne, A. (2013). U.S. institutionalized torture with impunity: Examining rape and sexual abuse in custody through the ICTY jurisprudence. Revista de Direito Internacional, 10(2), 2447. https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi/bjil.v10i2.2447
   Google Scholar
• Saar, M. S., Epstein, R., Rosenthal, L., & Vafa, Y. (2015). The sexual abuse to prison pipeline: The girls’ story. Center on Poverty and Inequality. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/poverty-inequality-center/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2019/02/The-Sexual-Abuse-To-Prison-Pipeline-The-Girls%E2%80%99-Story.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, W. (2018). The gender divide: Tracking women’s state prison growth. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/women_overtime.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schlanger, M., & Shay, G. (2007). Preserving the rule of law in America’s jails and prisons: The case for amending the PLRA. The University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Schlanger, M. (2003). Inmate litigation. Harvard Law Review, 116(6), 1555–1659. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, P. J. (1996). The link between stereotype attitudes and behavioral intentions among female inmates, correctional officers, and program staff. Michigan State University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 1996, 9734185.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, P. J., Koons-Witt, B. A., & Morash, M. (2004). Management strategies when working with female prisoners. Women & Criminal Justice, 15(2), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v15n02_02
   Google Scholar
• Sexton, L. (2015). Penal subjectivities: Developing a framework for penal consciousness. Punishment & Society, 17(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Mitchell, M., Haley, H., & Navarrete, C. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-006-0026-4
   Google Scholar
• Siegal, N. (1999). Stopping abuse in prison: Lawyers for women behind bars and human rights groups are making a difference. The Progressive, 63(4), 31–33. Available from NewsBank: Access World News – Historical and Current: https://infoweb.newsbank.com/apps/news/document-view?p=WORLDNEWS&docref=news/15CF7F55C995A8B8
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, K. (2020). Interview: Corene Kendrick on how the Prison Litigation Reform Act strips prisoners of legal rights. Prison Legal News. https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2020/sep/1/interview-corene-kendrick-how- prison-litigation-reform-act-strips-prisoners-legal-rights/
   Google Scholar
• Skitka, L. J. (2009). Exploring the “Lost and Found” of Justice Theory and Research. Social Justice Research, 22(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-009-0089-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, T. L., & Morton, D. C. (1994). Women in prison: Survey of state prison inmates, 1991. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. U.S. Department of Justice. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/SOSPI91.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., & Bottoms, A. E. (1995). Legitimacy and order in prisons. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/591622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, B., & Wooldredge, J. (2009). Individual and environmental effects on assaults and nonviolent rule breaking by women in prison. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 437–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427809341936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojkovic, S. (2003). Accounts of prison work: Corrections officers’ portrayals of their work worlds. In H. Copes & M.R. Pogrebin (Eds.), Voices from criminal justice: Insider perspectives, outsider experiences. (2nd ed). (pp. 376–392). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, J. R., Kaasa, S. O., & Cauffman, E. (2012). Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(2), 268–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects of judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law & Society Review, 22(1), 103–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 850–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.5.850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., & Rasinski, K. (1991). Procedural justice, institutional legitimacy, and the acceptance of unpopular US Supreme Court decisions: A reply to Gibson. Law & Society Review, 25(3), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with. leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphries, E. (2018). 150% wrong: The Prison Litigation Reform Act and attorney’s fees. American Criminal Law Review, 56(21), 261.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2015). United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison- reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-E-ebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of California. (2023, March 22). Former federal prison warden sentenced to more than five years in prison for sexual abuse of three females inmates. [Press release]. https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndca/pr/former-federal-prison-warden-sentenced-more- five-years-prison-sexual-abuse-three#:∼:text=OAKLAND%20%E2%80%93%20Former%20prison%20warden%20Ray,false%20statements%20to%20government%20agents.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs. (2022, May 24). BOP corrections officer pleads guilty to sexual assault of woman in federal custody in Los Angeles. [Press release]. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/bop-corrections-officer-pleads-guilty-sexual- assault-woman-federal-custody-los-angeles.
   Google Scholar
• van der Valk, S., Aizpurua, E., & Rogan, M. (2022). “[Y]ou are better off talking to a f****** wall”: The perceptions and experiences of grievance procedures among incarcerated people in Ireland. Law & Society Review, 56(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swearingen, V. (2008). Imprisoning rights: The failure of negotiated governance in the prison inmate grievance process. California Law Review, 96(5), 1353–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesley, R. W., Beyer, B. B. (2018). 2017 Annual Report. Summary of reports and status of recommendations. State of California Office of the Inspector General. https://www.oig.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/2017_OIG_Annual_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Winfree, L. T., & DeJong, C. (2015). Police and the war on women: A gender-linked examination behind and in front of the blue curtain. Women & Criminal Justice, 25(1–2), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2015.1023881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. M., Van Voorhis, P., Salisbury, E. J., & Bauman, A. (2012). Gender-responsive lessons learned and policy implications for women in prison: A review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1612–1632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoukis, C. (2017). Epidemic of suicides in California women’s prison. Prison Legal News, July, p. 56.
   Google Scholar