The Impact of Vulnerability on State Obligations in Criminal Proceedings on Domestic Violence: Interpreting the Istanbul Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights

REFERENCES

• Baumgärtel, M. (2020). Facing the challenge of migratory vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 38(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919898127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardes, M. N., & Martins, S. (2023). ‘The Terrorized Subject: A Critique of ‘Women’, ‘Gender Violence’ and ‘Vulnerability’ as Legal Categories. In Hennette Vauchez, Stéphanie and Rubio-Marín, Ruth (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Gender and the Law (pp. 98–131). Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Besson, S. (2014). ’La vulnerabilité et la structure des droits de l’homme – l’exemple de la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. In Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence (ed.), La vulnerabilité saisi par les juges en Europe (pp. 59–85). Pedone.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, H., & Lawler, S. (2021, May). How does domestic violence escalate over time? Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt, D. (2017). Intertwinement of Legal Spaces in the Transnational Legal Sphere. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156517000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women. (2014). Angela González Carreño v. Spain, Communication No. 47/2012, 16 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Engström, V., Heikkilä, M., & Mustaniemi-Laakso, M. (2022). Vulnerabilisation: Between mainstreaming and human rights overreach. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 40(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519221092599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Bevacqua and S. v. Bulgaria, App. No. 71127/01, 12 June 2008. (Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Buturugă v. Romania, App. No. 56867/15, 11 February 2020. (Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, App. No. 13134/87, 25 March 1993. (Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Đorđević v. Croatia, App. No. 41526/10, 24 July 2012. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Galović v. Croatia, App. No. 45512/11, 31 August 2021. (Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Hajduová v. Slovakia, App. No. 2660/03, 30 November 2010. (Chamber).
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, J.I. v. Croatia, App. No. 35898/16, 8 September 2022. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Kurt v. Austria, App. No. 62903/15, 15 June 2021. (Grand Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights. Levchuk v. Ukraine, App. No. 17496/19, 3 September 2020. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, M.G. v. Turkey, App. No. 646/10, 22 March 2016. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Opuz v. Turkey, App. No. 33401/02, 9 June 2009. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Osman v. the United Kingdom, App. No. 23452/94, 28 October 1998. (Grand Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Premininy v. Russia, App. No. 44973/04, 10 February 2011. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Rooman v. Belgium, App. No. 18052/11, 31 January 2019. (Grand Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, T.M. and C.M. v. the Republic of Moldova, App. No. 26608/11, 28 January 2014. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Talpis v. Italy, ECtHR, judgment (Chamber), App. No. 41237/14, 2 March 2017. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Tërshana v. Albania, App. No. 48756/14, 4 August 2020. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Tkhelidze v. Georgia, App. No. 33056/17, 8 July 2021. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Tomov and Others v. Russia, App. No. Applications nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, 4 April 2019. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Valiulienė v. Lithuania, App. No. 33234/07, 26 March 2013. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Volodina v. Russia, App. No. 41261/17, 9 July 2019. (Chamber)
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Human Rights, Rules of Court, 3 October 2022.
   Google Scholar
• European Union establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, Crime Victims Directive, Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, 11 May 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. (2008). ‘The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition’ Yale. Journal of Law & Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, A. M. & Grear A. (eds). (2013). Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Graca, S. (2017). Domestic violence policy and legislation in the UK: A discussion of immigrant women’s vulnerabilities. European Journal of Current Legal Issues, 22(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2017a). Baseline Evaluation Report, Austria. GREVIO/Inf(2017)4.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2017b). Baseline Evaluation Report Denmark. GREVIO/Inf(2017)14.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2019). Baseline Evaluation Report Portugal. GREVIO/Inf(2018)16.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2020a). Baseline Evaluation Report Serbia. GREVIO/Inf(2019)20.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2020b). Baseline Evaluation Report Malta. GREVIO/Inf(2020)17.
   Google Scholar
• GREVIO. (2022). Baseline report Bosnia and Herzegovina. GREVIO/Inf(2022)19.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M., & Buyse, A. (2018). Human Rights Courts as Norm-Brokers. Human Rights Law Review, 18(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heri, C. (2021). Responsive human rights: Vulnerability, ill-treatment and the ECtHR. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heri, C. (2020). Shaping Coercive Obligations through Vulnerability, The Example of the ECtHR. In Lavrysen, Laurens and Mavronicola, Natasa (Eds.), Coercive human rights: Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR (pp. 94–116). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, J. (2020). Domestic abuse and human rights. Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-Agency Statement on Violence against Women and Girls in the Context of COVID-19 (24 June 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Lenahan Gonzales et al. v. the United States, Report No. 80/11 Case No. 12.626 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Court of Human Rights, González et al. (“Cotton Field”) v. Mexico, 16 November Series C No. 205 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, F. (2015). ‘(De)Constructing Children’s Vulnerability under European Law. In Ippolito, Francesca and Sara Iglesias Sánchez (Eds), Protecting vulnerable groups, The European Human Rights Framework (pp. 23–47). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, F., & Sánchez, S. I. (2015). Introduction. In Ippolito, Francesca and Sara Iglesias Sánchez (Eds), Protecting vulnerable groups, The European Human Rights Framework (pp. 1–20). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, F. (2020, 11 March). Cyberviolence, domestic abuse and lack of a gender-sensitive approach – Reflections on Buturuga versus Romania. Strasbourg Observers (Blog Post).
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (2014). Introduction: What is vulnerability and why does it matter for moral theory? In Mackenzie, Catriona, Rogers, Wendy and Dodds, Susan, Vulnerability, new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyersfeld, B. (2010). Domestic violence and international law. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, J., & Van Praag, L. (2022). Migrants as ‘vulnerable groups’ in the COVID-19 pandemic: A critical discourse analysis of a taken-for-granted label in academic literature. SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100076
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mustaniemi-Laakso, M., Katsui, H., & Heikkilä, M. (2022). Vulnerability, Disability, and Agency: Exploring Structures for Inclusive Decision-Making and Participation in a Responsive State. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 1581-1609.
   Google Scholar
• Nifosi-Sutton, I. (2017). The protection of vulnerable groups under international human rights law. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, M. The notion of “vulnerable groups” in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, report. CDL-LA(2016) 003 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Peroni, L. (2016). Violence against migrant women: The Istanbul convention through a postcolonial feminist lens. Feminist Legal Studies, 24(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-016-9316-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peroni, L., & Timmer, A. (2013). Vulnerable groups: The promise of an emerging concept in European Human Rights Convention law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(4), 1056–1085. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mot042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Tamimi, Y. (2016). The protection of vulnerable groups and individuals by the european court of human rights. European Journal of Human Rights, 5, 561–583.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, A. (2013). A quiet revolution: Vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights. In Albertson Fineman, Martha & Grear, Anna (Eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics (pp. 147–170). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, A., Baumgärtel, M., Kotzé, L., & Slingenberg, L. (2021). The potential and pitfalls of the vulnerability concept for human rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 39(3), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/09240519211048009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women, Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences, UN Doc. E/CN.4/1996/53, 5 February (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Voce, I., & Boxall, H. (2018, September). Who reports domestic violence to the police? A review of the evidence. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, S., & Towers, J. (2017). Measuring violence to end violence: mainstreaming gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X14913081639155
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. Executive summary.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, N. (2015). Legislating for the vulnerable? Special duties under the European convention on human rights. Swiss Review of International and European Law, 25(4), 539–562.
   Google Scholar