“They’re Meant for Men”: The Gendered Meaning of “Evidence-Based Practices” in Prison

REFERENCES

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, V. R., Hoskins, K. M., & Rubino, L. L. (2019). Defining gender-responsive services in a Juvenile Court setting. Women & Criminal Justice, 29(6), 338–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1588836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. D., Pitner, R. O., & Wooten, N. R. (2020). A gender-specific model of trauma and victimization in incarcerated women. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1673272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, V. R., Walerych, B. M., Campbell, N. A., Barnes, A. R., Davidson, W. S., II, Campbell, C. A., Onifade, E., & Petersen, J. L. (2019b). Gender-responsive intervention for female juvenile offenders: A quasi-experimental outcome evaluation. Feminist Criminology, 14(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116677749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, G. (1999). A meta-analytic investigation into effective correctional intervention for female offenders. Forum on Corrections Research, 11(3), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Pena, A., & Bustelo, M. (2023). Gender equality in prison reform in Spain: how a gender-biased, closed policy system prevents real change. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 6(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16490897406533
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, G. D. (2012). Gender-responsive programming: A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences of a gender-neutral cognitive skills programme. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683161003623256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belknap, J., Lynch, S., & DeHart, D. (2016). Jail staff members’ views on jailed women’s mental health, trauma, offending, rehabilitation, and reentry. The Prison Journal, 96(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515605485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2004). Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy. Review of Policy Research, 21(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00056.x
   Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (1997). Gendered Organizational Logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender & Society, 11(6), 796–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124397011006005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2003). At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics (2019). Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) – Prisoners. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., Keaton, S., & Pennell, S. (2003). Addressing the gender-specific needs of girls: An evaluation of San Diego’s WINGS Program–Final Report. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG).
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, L. (2006). Comparing political institutions: Revealing the gendered “logic of appropriateness”. Politics & Gender, 2(02), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X06221044
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (1995). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Andersen, T. S. (2008). Girls troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(1), 162–189. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.41.1.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, S. S., Burke, C., Keaton, S., & Norcott, C. (2008). Evaluation of a trauma-informed and gender-responsive intervention for women in drug treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Suppl 5(sup5), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2008.10400666
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T. (2013). Rehabilitation: Beyond nothing works. Crime and Justice, 42(1), 299–376. https://doi.org/10.1086/670395
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81(3), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885501081003002
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F. T., Myer, A. J., & Latessa, E. J. (2009). Eight lessons from Moneyball: The high cost of ignoring evidence-based corrections. Victims and Offenders, 4(2), 197–213.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1992). Women’s pathways to Felony Court: Feminist theories of lawbreaking and problems of representation. S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women’s Stud, 2, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. T., Pasko, L., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2011). “She’s way too good to lose”: An evaluation of Honolulu’s girls court. Women & Criminal Justice, 21(4), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2011.609406
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. C., Zahn, M. A., & Tichavsky, L. P. (2014). What works and for whom? The effects of gender responsive programming on girls and boys in secure detention. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 93–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814538033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart, D., & Iachini, A. L. (2019). Mental health & trauma among incarcerated persons: Development of a training curriculum for correctional officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 44, 457–473.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, L. M. (2006). Whores and thieves of the worst kind": A study of women, crime, and prisons, 1835-2000. Northern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2015). Importance of Program Integrity. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franich, G., Sandy, L., & Stone, U. (2021). ‘It’s not designed for women at all’: exploring service providers’ perspectives of working in the Victorian criminal justice system. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2020.1837713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, E. B. (1981). Their Sisters’ Keepers: Women’s prison reform in America, 1830-1930. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galardi, T. R., & Settersten, R. A. Jr., (2018). “They’re just made up different”: Juvenile correctional staff perceptions of incarcerated boys and girls. Children and Youth Services Review, 95, 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobeil, R., Blanchette, K., & Stewart, L. (2016). A meta-analytic review of correctional interventions for women offenders: Gender-neutral versus gender-informed approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815621100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, P., Page, J., & Phelps, M. (2015). The long struggle: An agonistic perspective on penal development. Theoretical Criminology, 19(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480614547151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga, A. (2019). Triaging rehabilitation: The retreat of state-funded prison programming. In K. M. Middlemass & C. J. Smiley (Eds.). Prisoner reentry in the 21st century: Critical perspectives of returning home (pp. 26–38). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. L., Armstrong, G. S., & Hepburn, J. R. (2005). Correctional officers’ perceptions of equitable treatment in the masculinized prison environment. Criminal Justice Review, 30(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016805284306
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat, K. (2010). Sacrosanct or flawed: Risk, accountability and gender-responsive penal politics. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 22(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2010.12035882
   Google Scholar
• Jenness, V. (2010). From policy to prisoners to people: A “soft mixed methods” approach to studying transgender prisoners. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 39(5), 517–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241610375823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakuk, M. (2020). Female tactical members in correctional services: “No Room for Women”. Women & Criminal Justice, 30(6), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1576574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (2008). Men and women of the corporation (New edition). Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Kras, K. R., Portillo, S., & Taxman, F. S. (2017). Managing from the Middle: Frontline supervisors and perceptions of their organizational power. Law & Policy, 39(3), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kras, K. R., Rudes, D. S., & Taxman, F. S. (2017). Managing up and down: Community corrections middle managers’ role conflict and ambiguity during organizational change. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2015.1085889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C. (2016). The politics and place of gender in research on crime. Criminology, 54(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond Correctional Quackery - Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Fed. Probation, 66, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Lovins, B., Schweitzer, M., & Sullivan, C. (2013). Gender neutral or gender specific predictors of recidivism: Should risk assessment incorporate separate scales for boys and girls? Scientific Committee of Reviewers, 284–289.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. E., & Jurik, N. C. (2007). Doing justice, doing gender: Women in legal and criminal justice occupations. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Morash, M., Bynum, T. S., & Koons-Witt, B. (1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, B., Wells, J., & Pollock, J. (2017). In search of safety: Confronting inequality in women’s imprisonment. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, S. (2007). “I'm Just Not Good in Relationships:” Victimization discourses and the gendered regulation of criminalized women. Feminist Criminology, 2(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085106297521
   Google Scholar
• Rafter, N. H. (1985). Partial justice: Women in state prisons, 1800-1935. Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rocque, M., Welsh, B. C., Greenwood, P. W., & King, E. (2014). Implementing and sustaining evidence-based practice in juvenile justice: A case study of a rural state. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58(9), 1033–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X13490661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S. (2012). Framing organizational reform: Misalignments and disputes among parole and union middle managers. Law & Policy, 34(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Magnuson, S., Portillo, S., & Hattery, A. (2021). Sex logics: Negotiating the prison rape elimination act (PREA) against its’ administrative, safety, and cultural burdens. Punishment & Society, 23(2), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474520952155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudes, D. S., Viglione, J., & Taxman, F. S. (2017). Gendered adherence: Correctional officers and therapeutic reform in a reentry facility. The Prison Journal, 97(4), 496–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517711979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury, E. J., & Van Voorhis, P. (2009). Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers’ paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 541–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809334076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena, P., Messina, N. P., & Grella, C. E. (2014). Who benefits from gender-responsive treatment? Accounting for abuse history on longitudinal outcomes for women in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813514405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Porter, M. (1983). On the bottom rung: A discussion of women’s work in sociology. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6(2), 211–221. (Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(83)90012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P. (2012). On behalf of women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 11(2), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., & Presser, L. (2001). Classification of women offenders: A national assessment of current practices. US Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(3), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, S., & Fraser, H. (2019). Promoting gender responsive support for women inmates: A case study from inside a prison. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 15(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-03-2018-0011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. J., Zhang, S. X., & Farabee, D. (2012). A squandered opportunity? A review of SAMHSA’s national registry of evidence-based programs and practices for offenders. Crime & Delinquency, 58(6), 954–972.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. C., Gartner, J., O'Connor, T., Larson, D., & Wright, K. N. (1995). The impact of a volunteer prison ministry program on the long-term recidivism of federal inmates. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(1–2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v22n01_07
   Google Scholar