Beef production systems with dairy × beef heifers based on forage and semi-natural grassland

References

• Åman, P. & Hesselman, K. (1984). Analysis of starch and other main constituents of cereal grains. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 14, 135–139.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, A. (1999). Nutritional value in grasses from semi-natural pastures. Masters thesis, Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. & Hedlund, B. (1983). HPLC analysis of organic acids in lactic acid fermented vegetables. Zeitschrift Fur Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung, 176(6), 440–443. doi:10.1007/BF01042558
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axelsson, J. (1941). Der Gehalt des Futters an umsetzbarer Energie. Züchtungskunde, 16, 337–347.
   Google Scholar
• Basiel, B. L. & Felix, T. L. (2022). Board invited review: Crossbreeding beef × dairy cattle for the modern beef production system. Translational Animal Science, 6, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brondizio, E. S., Settele, J., Díaz, S. & Ngo, H. T. (2019). Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: doi:10.5281/zenodo.3831673.
   Google Scholar
• Casas, E. & Cundiff, L. V. (2006). Postweaning growth and carcass traits in crossbred cattle from Hereford, Angus, Norwegian Red, Swedish Red and White, Friesian, and Wagyu maternal grandsires. Journal of Animal Science, 84(2), 305–310. doi:10.2527/2006.842305x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, W. & Udén, P. (1998). An alternative oven method combined with different detergent strengths in the analysis of neutral detergent fibre. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 74(4), 281–288. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00187-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapple, D. G., Grundy, H. F., Keatinge, R. & Mann, G. (2000). Comparative performance of Simmental * Holstein/Friesian and Belgian Blue * Holstein/Friesian cows in an autumn calving suckler herd. In D. Pullar (ed.), Beef from Grass and Forage, ADAS Rosemaund (Wynne: Preston Publications), pp. 175–178.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Union (2008). Commission regulation (EC) no 1249/2008. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:337:0003:0030:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Coop (2023). Coop naturbeteskött. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://www.coop.se/hallbarhet/hallbarhetsarbete/kott/naturbeteskott/.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, C. H., O’Quinn, T. G., Garmyn, A. J., Legako, J. F., Hunt, M. R., Dinh, T. T. N., Rathmann, R. J., Brooks, J. C. & Miller, M. F. (2015). Sensory evaluation of tender beef strip loin steaks of varying marbling levels and quality treatments. Meat Science, 100, 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union (2007). Council regulation (EC) no 1234/2007. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/eur75432.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, J. B. A. (1831). Proceeds de l’analyse organique. Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 247, 198–213.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, O. (2022). Coproduction of food, cultural heritage and biodiversity by livestock grazing in Swedish semi-natural grasslands. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 801327. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2022.801327
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S., Ask-Gullstrand, P., Fikse, W. F., Jonsson, E., Eriksson, J.-Å., Stålhammar, H., Wallenbeck, A. & Hessle, A. (2020). Different beef breed sires used for crossbreeding with Swedish dairy cows – Effects on calving performance and carcass traits. Livestock Science 232, 8 p.p. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2019.103902.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council Directive 1998/64/EC (1998). Official Journal of European Communities. Commission of the European Communities. L257/14. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:257:0014:0028:En:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Climate, Infrastructure, and Environment Executive Agency (2023). New Nature Restoration Law boosts biodiversity and climate action across Europe. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/new-nature-restoration-law-boosts-biodiversity-and-climate-action-across-europe-2023-07-12_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2022). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nature restoration. 2022/0195 (cod). Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/publications/nature-restoration-law_en
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (2020). State of the nature in EU. Report 10. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu-2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism. (2023). High nature value farming. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: http://www.high-nature-value-farming.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Frame, J. (1993). Herbage mass. In A. Davis, R. D. Baker, S. A. Grant & A. S. Laidlaw (Eds.), Sward Measurement Handbook (Dunston: British Grassland Society), pp. 39–67).
   Google Scholar
• Gault, N. F. S., Farrell, D. T., Devlin, D., Majury, L., Lewis, H., Gordon, A. W., Lively, F. & Farmer, L. J. (2015). Beef from dairy breeds versus dairy × beef breed crosses: A comparison of production factors and meat eating quality. Proceedings of the 61st International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, I. (1989). Composition and characteristics of bovine carcasses. Report 89. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hessle, A., Dahlström, F. & Wallin, K. (2011). Alternative production systems for male Charolais cross-bred cattle using semi-natural grasslands. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 61(1), 21–33. doi:10.1080/09064702.2010.543427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessle, A., Nadeau, E. & Johnsson, S. (2007). Beef heifer production as affected by indoor feed intensity and slaughter age when grazing semi-natural grasslands in summer. Livestock Science, 111(1–2), 124–135. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2006.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessle, A., Therkildsen, M. & Arvidsson-Segerkvist, K. (2019). Beef production systems with steers of dairy and dairy × beef breeds based on forage and semi-natural pastures. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 9(12), 1064. doi:10.3390/ani9121064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HKScan. (2023). Payoff. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://www.hkscanagri.se/notering/.
   Google Scholar
• Holmström, K., Kumm, K.-I., Andersson, H., Nadeau, E., Segerkvist, K. A. & Hessle, A. (2021). Economic incentives for preserving biodiverse semi-natural pastures with calves from dairy cows. Journal for Nature Conservation, 62, 126010. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, A., Pesonen, M., Kämäräinen, H. & Kauppinen, R. (2013). A comparison of the growth and carcass traits between dairy and dairy × beef breed crossbred heifers reared for beef production. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 22(3), 188–196. doi:10.22358/jafs/65987/2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jukna, V., Jukna, C. & Pečiulaitienė, N. (2009). The beef production efficiency of milk cattle used crossed with different intensive beef cattle breeds. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 25(5–6), 293–300. doi:10.2298/BAH0906293J
   Google Scholar
• Kenward, M. G. & Roger, J. H. (2009). An improved approximation to the precision of fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 53(7), 2583–2595. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2008.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, E. (1979). The nutritional value of roughages determined in vivo and by laboratory methods. Report 45. Department of Animal Nutrition, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, E. D. (2021). Beef cattle data analytics: Trends in feedlot cattle health, performance, and carcass traits, and effects of beef on dairy programs. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mordenti, A. L., Brogna, N., Canestrari, G., Bonfante, E., Eusebi, S., Mammi, L. M. E., Giaretta, E. & Formigoni, A. (2019). Effects of breed and different lipid dietary supplements on beef quality. Animal Science Journal, 90(5), 619–627. doi:10.1111/asj.13177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation. (2023). Accessed 5 October 2023, available at: https://nordicebv.info/.
   Google Scholar
• Plateryd, L. (2004). Consumers and pasture beef. Motives for purchases of Kaprifolkött and views of rural landscapes. Occasional Papers. Department of Human Geography, University of Gothenburg, 2004:4.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. (2018). Inc. SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.).
   Google Scholar
• SJVFS 127. (1998). Directions of classifications of carcasses from the Swedish Board of Agriculture (Swedish Board of Agriculture). Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://lagen.nu/sjvfs/1998:127.
   Google Scholar
• Skövde slakteri. (2023). Payoff. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://www.skovdeslakteri.com/noteringssidan.php.
   Google Scholar
• Spörndly, R. (ed.). (2003). Feed tables for ruminants. Report 257. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Spörndly, E., Olsson, I. & Burstedt, E. (2000). Grazing by steers at different sward surface heights on extensive pastures: A study of weight gain and fat deposition. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science, 50(3), 184–192. doi:10.1080/090647000750014313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenskt Sigill. (2023). Svenskt Sigill pasture beef for biodiversity. Accessed 5 September 2023, available at: https://www.svensktsigill.se/hallbarhet/vara-marken/naturbeteskott/.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2023). Agri-environmental payments for management of pastureland and meadows 2023. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://jordbruksverket.se/stod/jordbruk-tradgard-och-rennaring/jordbruksmark/betesmarker-och-slatterangar/skotsel-av-betesmarker-och-slatterangar.
   Google Scholar
• Toräng, P. & Jacobson, A. (2019). An assessment of favorable reference areas for grassland habitat types in the 2019 reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. PM SLU.dha.2019.5.5-16 (Swedish Species Information Centre).
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture. (2018). Official USDA marbling photographs. Accessed 7 December 2018, available at: https://swfulfillment.1touchpoint.com/sv5fmsnet/OeCart/OEFrame.asp?Action=NEWORDER&cmenunodseq=&FromFav=&PmSess1=58859&pos=006142&v=2NCBA/Secure/StoreItem.aspx?ID=16313&ITEMS=CATALOG&CAT=165&TP=180.
   Google Scholar
• Växa Sverige. (2023). Cattle statistics 2023. Accessed 6 September 2023, available at: https://vxa.qbank.se/mb/?h=c7a1d64e698d8df91094699ba3ffd110&p=dccda36951e6721097a93eae5c593859&display=feature&s=name&d=desc.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, A. J. F. (1989). Bioenergetics, bioengineering and growth. Animal Science, 48(2), 249–269. doi:10.1017/S0003356100040265
   Google Scholar
• Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. & Hunter, E. A. (1989). Compensatory growth in cattle grazing different vegetation types. Animal Production, 48(1), 43–50. doi:10.1017/S0003356100003779
   Google Scholar