A comparison of three animal welfare assessment protocols applied to Swedish dairy cow herds

References

• Barry, C., Ellingsen-Dalskau, K., Garmo, R. T., Grønmo Kischel, S., Winckler, C. & Kielland, C. (2023). Obtaining an animal welfare status in Norwegian dairy herds – A mountain to climb. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1125860. doi:10.3389/fvets.2023.1125860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthe, F., Vannier, P., Have, P., Serratosa, J., Bastino, E., Broom, D. M., Hartung, J. & Sharp, J. M. (2012). Special issue: The role of EFSA in assessing and promoting animal health and welfare. EFSA Journal, 10(10), s1002. (10 pp.). doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.s1002. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal.
   Google Scholar
• Blokhuis, H. J., Veissier, I., Miele, M. & Jones, B. (2010). The welfare quality® project and beyond: safeguarding farm animal well-being. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A-Animal Science, 60(3), 129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brscic, M., Otten, N. D., Contiero, B. & Kirchner, M. K. (2019). Investigation of a standardized qualitative behaviour assessment and exploration of potential influencing factors on the emotional state of dairy calves. Animals, 9(10), 757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, M., Engel, B., den Uijl, I., van Schaik, G., Dijkstra, T., de Boer, I. J. M. & Bokkers, E. A. M. (2013). Assessment time of the Welfare Quality (protocol for dairy cattle). Animal Welfare, 22, 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1998). Council Directive 98/58/EC of 20 July 1998 concerning the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 221, 8.8.98, 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2008). Council Directive 2008/119/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of calves. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 10, 15.1.2009, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Gieseke, D., Lambertz, C. & Gauly, M. (2022). Effects of housing and management factors on selected indicators of the welfare quality® protocol in loose-housed dairy cows. Veterinary Sciences, 9, 353. doi:10.3390/vetsci9070353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauge, S. J., Kielland, C., Ringdal, G., Skjerve, E. & Nafstad, O. (2012). Factors associated with cattle cleanliness on Norwegian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 7, 3213–3282.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C. A. E., Browne, W. J., Mullan, S. & Main, D. C. J. (2014). Navigating the iceberg: reducing the number of parameters within the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for dairy cows. Animal, 8(12), 1978–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Pedersen, L. J. & Munksgaard, L. (2005). The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 90, 207–217. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeling, L. J. (2009). An analysis of animal-based versus resource-based comments in official animal welfare inspection reports from organic and conventional farms in Sweden. Animal Welfare, 18, 391–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KilBride, A. L., Mason, S. A., Honeyman, P. C., Pritchard, D. G., Hepple, S. & Green, L. E. (2012). Associations between membership of farm assurance and organic certification schemes and compliance with animal welfare legislation. Veterinary Record, 170, 152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knierim, U. & Winckler, C. (2009). On-farm welfare assessment in cattle: validity, reliability and feasibility issues and future perspectives with special regard to the Welfare Quality® approach. Animal Welfare, 18(4), 451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark, F., Röcklinsberg, H., Wahlberg, B. & Berg, C. (2016). Content and structure of Swedish animal welfare legislation and private standards for dairy cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A-Animal Science, 66(1), 35–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otten, N. D., Rousing, T., de Oliveira, V. H. S., Reiten, M., Michelsen, A. M., Hakansson, F., Lund, V. P., Houe, H., Denwood, M., Sorensen, J. T., Forkman, B. & Kirchner, M. K. (2020). A weak point analysis of welfare in Danish dairy herds using two different welfare assessment systems. Animal Welfare, 29(2), 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radeski, M., Janevski, A. & Ilieski, V. (2015). Screening of selected indicators of dairy cattle welfare in Macedonia. Macedonian Veterinary Review, 38(1), 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sandgren, C. H., Lindberg, A. & Keeling, L. J. (2009). Using a national dairy database to identify herds with poor welfare. Animal Welfare, 18, 523–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staaf Larsson, B. (2014). Comparison of three assessment programmes in Sweden; The official animal-based welfare control, Ask the Cow and Welfare Quality®. MSc thesis, Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Stull, C. L., Reed, B. A. & Berry, S. L. (2005). A comparison of three animal welfare assessment programs on California dairies. Journal of Dairy Science, 88(4), 1595–1600. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72828-9. PMID: 15778329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2019). Statens jordbruksverks föreskrifter och allmänna råd (SJVFS 2019:18) om nötkreaturshållning inom lantbruket m.m. [The Swedish Board of Agriculture’s regulations and general recommendations (SJVFS 2019:18) on cattle husbandry in agriculture, etc.], Case No L 104.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2022). Vägledning för offentlig djurskyddskontroll [‘Guidelines for official animal welfare control’]; Swedish Board of Agriculture: Jönköping (Sweden).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. (2023). Antal djur och jordbruksföretag med djur efter Län, Kategori, Variabel, Tabelluppgift och År. PxWeb (sjv.se). [Number of animals and agricultural enterprises with animals by County, Category, Variable, Tabular information and Year.] Assessed 1 February 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2018). Animal Welfare Act (2018:1192).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2019). Animal Welfare Ordinance (2019:66).
   Google Scholar
• Tremetsberger, L., Leeb, C. & Winckler, C. (2015). Animal health and welfare planning improves udder health and cleanliness but not leg health in Austrian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 98(10), 6801–6811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremetsberger, L., Winckler, C. & Kantelhardt, J. (2019). Animal health and welfare state and technical efficiency of dairy farms: possible synergies. Animal Welfare, 28(3), 345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Os, J. M. C., Winckler, C., Trieb, J., Matarazzo, S. V., Lehenbauer, T. W., Champagne, J. D. & Tucker, C. B. (2018). Reliability of sampling strategies for measuring dairy cattle welfare on commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 1495–1504. doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality®. (2009). Welfare quality® assessment protocol for cattle. welfare quality®. Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. http://www.welfarequality.net/media/1088/cattle_protocol_without_veal_calves.pdf.
   Google Scholar