Online learning barriers and its relationship to gender, age, work status, and chronotype in university student

References

• Adan A, Archer SN, Hidalgo MP, Di Milia L, Natale V, Randler C. 2012. Circadian typology: a comprehensive review. Chronobiol Int. 29(9):1153–1175. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.719971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali GE, Magalhaes R. 2008. Barriers to implementing e‐learning: a Kuwaiti case study. Int J Train Dev. 12(1):36–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2419.2007.00294.x
   Google Scholar
• Amro HJ, Mundy MA, Kupczynski L. 2015. The effects of age and gender on student achievement in face-to-face and online college algebra classes. Res High Educ J. 27. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/142077.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasakis M, Triantafyllou G, Petridis K. 2021. Undergraduates’ barriers to online learning during the pandemic in Greece. Technol, Knowl Learn. 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09584-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aruğaslan E, Çivril H. 2022. Uzaktan Eğitim Öğrencilerinin Hayat Boyu Öğrenme Çerçevesinde Uzaktan Eğitime Yönelik Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. Türkiye Eğitim Dergisi. 7(2):335–344. doi: 10.54979/turkegitimdergisi.1158390
   Google Scholar
• Balcı Ö, Çalışkan M. 2022. Investigation of the relationship between chronotype, learning style and academic achievement of university students during distance education in the pandemic period. Chronobiol Int. 39(6):858–871. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2022.2041658
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çivril H, Aruğaslan E. 2022. Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme becerilerinin incelenmesi: ISUBÜ Uzaktan Eğitim Meslek Yüksekokulu örneği. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi. 8(2):55–73. doi: 10.51948/auad.1076895.
   Google Scholar
• Demir Kaymak Z, Horzum MB. 2022. Student barriers to online learning as predictors of perceived learning and academic achievement. Turk Online J Dist Educ. 23(2):97–106. doi: 10.17718/tojde.1096250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Morales JF, Jankowski KS, Vollmer C, Randler C. 2013. Morningness and life satisfaction: further evidence from Spain. Chronobiol Int. 30(10):1283–1285. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.840786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikici A. 2022. COVID-19 Pandemisinin üniversite öğrencilerinin ruh sağliğina etkisi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer. 12(3):566–572. doi: 10.33631/sabd.1174409
   Google Scholar
• Di Milia L, Adan A, Natale V, Randler C. 2013. Reviewing the psychometric properties of contemporary circadian typology measures. Chronobiol Int. 30(10):1261–1271. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.817415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Turk S, Cherney ID. 2016. Administrators’ and faculty’s perceived online education barriers and the role of transformational leadership at a U.S. University in Lebanon. Creighton J Interdis Leadership. 2(1):15–31. doi: 10.17062/cjil.v2i1.30
   Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Lombardi DA, Marucci-Wellman H, Roenneberg T. 2017. Chronotypes in the US–influence of age and sex. PLoS ONE. 12(6):e0178782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökmen ÖF, Duman İ, Horzum MB. 2016. Uzaktan eğitimde kuramlar, değişimler ve yeni yönelimler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd). 2(3):29–51
   Google Scholar
• Goldin AP, Sigman M, Braier G, Golombek DA, Leone MJ. 2020. Interplay of chronotype and school timing predicts school performance. Nat Hum Behav. 4(4):387–396. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0820-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombek DA, Cardinali DP. 2008. Mind, brain, education, and biological timing. Mind Brain Educ. 2(1):1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstra WA, de Weerd AW. 2008. How to assess circadian rhythm in humans: a review of literature. Epilepsy Behav. 13(3):438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horzum F. 2019. Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazırbulunuşluk ile algılanan engeller arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamş Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü
   Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Canan Güngören Ö, Gür Erdoğan D. 2022. The influence of chronotype, personality, sex, and sleep duration on facebook addiction of university students in Turkey. Biol Rhythm Res. 53(7):1105–1115. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2021.1907508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Demir Kaymak Z. 2017. Ahlaki Kayıtsızlık Ölçeği nin Türkçe ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2(2):61–84. doi: 10.51280/yjer.2017.009
   Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Kaymak ZD, Gungoren OC. 2015. Structural equation modeling towards online learning readiness, academic motivations, and perceived learning. Edu Sci Theory Pract. 15(3). doi: 10.12738/estp.2015.3.2410
   Google Scholar
• Horzum MB, Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş. 2014. Chronotype and academic achievement among online learning students. Learn Individ Differ. 30:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski KS, Vollmer C, Linke M, Randler C. 2014. Differences in sun time within the same time zone affect sleep–wake and social rhythms, but not morningness preference: findings from a polish–German comparison study. Time Soc. 23(2):258–276. doi: 10.1177/0961463X14535911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovski D, Bassili JN. 2007. The relationship between morningness–eveningness preference and online learning. Biol Rhythm Res. 38(5):355–365. doi: 10.1080/09291010600950149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyucu M. 2017. Y kuşağı ve teknoloji: Y kuşağının iletişim teknolojilerini kullanım alışkanlıkları. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi. 5(2):845–872. doi: 10.19145/e-gifder.285714
   Google Scholar
• Limayem M, Cheung CM. 2008. Understanding information systems continuance: the case of internet-based learning technologies. Inf Manage. 45(4):227–232. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y. 2013. Chronotypes and online learning: a study on learners’ choice, participation and performance. AECT 13th Annual. 120. https://members.aect.org/pdf/Proceedings/proceedings13/2013/13_18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Pan R, Choi JH, Mellish L, Strobel J. 2011. Why choose online learning: relationship of existing factors and chronobiology. J Educ Comput Res. 45(4):379–397. doi:10.2190/EC.45
   Google Scholar
• Luo Y, Pan R, Choi JH, Strobel J. 2018. Effects of chronotypes on students’ choice, participation, and performance in online learning. J Educ Comput Res. 55(8):1069–1087. doi: 10.1177/0735633117697729
   Google Scholar
• Mashile EO, Fynn A, Matoane M. 2020. Institutional barriers to learning in the South African open distance learning context. South African J Higher Edu. 34(2):129–145. doi: 10.20853/34-2-3662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May RJ, Tyndall I, McTiernan A, Roderique‐Davies G, McLoughlin S. 2022. The impact of the SMART program on cognitive and academic skills: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Br J Educ Technol. 53(5):1244–1261. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaruli A, Castelli L, Galasso L, Mulè A, Bruno E, Esposito F, Roveda E, Roveda E. 2019. Effect of chronotype on academic achievement in a sample of Italian University students. Chronobiol Int. 36(11):1482–1495. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2019.1652831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montaruli A, Castelli L, Mulè A, Scurati R, Esposito F, Galasso L, Roveda E. 2021. Biological rhythm and chronotype: new perspectives in health. Biomolecules. 11(4):487. doi: 10.3390/biom11040487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MG, Kearsley G. 2005. Distance education: a systems view, second. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Muilenburg LY, Berge ZL. 2005. Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26(1):29–48. doi: 10.1080/01587910500081269
   Google Scholar
• Muilenburg L, Berge ZL. 2001. Barriers to distance education: a factor-analytic study. Am J Distance Educ. 15(2):7–22. doi: 10.1080/08923640109527081
   Google Scholar
• Naveed QN, Muhammad A, Sanober S, Qureshi MRN, Shah A. 2017. A mixed method study for investigating critical success factors (CSFs) of e-learning in Saudi Arabian universities. Methods. 8(5):171–178. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080522
   Google Scholar
• Olesova LA, Yang D, Richardson JC. 2011. Cross-cultural differences in undergraduate students’ perceptions of online barriers. Online Learn. 15(3): doi: 10.24059/olj.v15i3.173
   Google Scholar
• Önder İ, Beşoluk Ş, Horzum MB. 2013. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the composite scale of morningness in high school and university students. Span J Psychol. 16(E67):1–10. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.76
   Google Scholar
• Perris K, Zhang W, Poon T. 2004. An investigation of distance learners’ preferences for and barriers to online learning in Hong Kong. Indian J Open Learn. 13(2):139–149
   Google Scholar
• Rahafar A, Maghsudloo M, Farhangnia S, Vollmer C, Randler C. 2016. The role of chronotype, gender, test anxiety, and conscientiousness in academic achievement of high school students. Chronobiol Int. 33(1):1–9. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1107084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahafar A, Randler C, Vollmer C, Kasaeian A. 2017. Prediction of school achievement through a multi-factorial approach–the unique role of chronotype. Learn Individ Differ. 55:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C. 2017. Chronotype correlates with developmental index, intelligence and academic achievement: a study based on nationwide indicators. Chronobiol Int. 34(7):985–992. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2017.1332070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Frech D. 2006. Correlation between morningness – eveningness and final school leaving exams. Biol Rhythm Res. 37(3):233–239. doi: 10.1080/09291010600645780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Horzum MB, Vollmer C. 2014a. The influence of personality and chronotype on distance learning willingness and anxiety among vocational high school students in Turkey. Int Rev Res Open Dis. 15(6): doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1928
   Google Scholar
• Randler C, Horzum MB, Vollmer C. 2014b. Internet addiction and its relationship to chronotype and personality in a Turkish university student sample. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 32(4):484–495. doi: 10.1177/0894439313511055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Stadler L, Vollmer C, Díaz-Morales JF. 2012. Relationship between depressive symptoms and sleep duration/chronotype in women. J Individ Dif. 33(3):186–191. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Vollmer C, Beşoluk Ş, Önder İ, Horzum MB. 2014a. Age and gender differences in morningness-eveningness in Turkish adolescents and young adults. Biol Rhythm Res. 45(2):277–284. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2013.805915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randler C, Wolfgang L, Matt K, Demirhan E, Horzum MB, Beşoluk Ş. 2016. Smartphone addiction proneness in relation to sleep and morningness–eveningness in German adolescents. J Behav Addict. 5(3):465–473. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed F. 2007. Factors impeding implementation of web-based distance learning. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal). 15(3):315–338
   Google Scholar
• Roman M, Plopeanu AP. 2021. The effectiveness of the emergency eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. The case of higher education in economics in Romania. Inter Rev Eco Edu. 37:100218. doi: 10.1016/j.iree.2021.100218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage MJ, James R, Magistro D, Donaldson J, Healy LC, Nevill M, Hennis PJ. 2020. Mental health and movement behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in UK university students: Prospective cohort study. Ment Health Phys Act. 19:100357. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3631268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert H, Üngören Y, Pelin M, Horzum MB. 2023. Relationship between chronotypes, personality traits, and phubbing levels in university students. Biol Rhythm Res. 54(3):322–333. doi: 10.1080/09291016.2023.2169653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Reilly C, Midkiff K. 1989. Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J Appl Psychol. 74(5):728. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetti L, Adan A, Di Milia L, Randler C, Natale V. 2015. Measures of circadian preference in childhood and adolescence: a review. European Psych. 30(5):576–582. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.01.006
   Google Scholar
• Vollmer C, Randler C. 2012. Circadian preferences and personality values: morning types prefer social values, evening types prefer individual values. Pers Indiv Differ. 52(6):738–743. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer C, Randler C, Horzum MB, Ayas T. 2014. Computer game addiction in adolescents and its relationship to chronotype and personality. SAGE Open. 4(1):1–9. doi: 10.1177/2158244013518054
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan L, Whitelock‐Wainwright A, Guan Q, Wen G, Gašević D, Chen G. 2021. Students’ experience of online learning during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a province‐wide survey study. Br J Educ Technol. 52(5):2038–2057. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiğit T, Bingöl O, Armağan H, Aruğaslan E, Çolak R, Yakut G, Çivril H. 2010. Uzaktan eğitimde yeni bir yaklaşim: e-stüdyo. Muğla Üniversitesi, Akademik Bilişim. 1:97–105
   Google Scholar
• Yukselturk E, Bulut S. 2009. Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. J Edu Technol Soc. 12(3):12–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerbini G, Merrow M. 2017. Time to learn: how chronotype impacts education. Psych J. 6(4):263–276. doi: 10.1002/pchj.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilli I, Giganti F, Salzarulo P. 2007. Yawning in morning and evening types. Physiol Behav. 91(2–3):218–222. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar