Quantitative Studies on Vocabulary and Syntax (in Chinese)

References

• Altmann, G. (2005). Diversification processes. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 646–658). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Deng, S., & Liu, H. (2022). Syntactic complexity of different text types: From the perspective of dependency distance both linearly and hierarchically. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29(4), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2021.2005960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong, J., & Liu, H. (2014). Approaching human language with complex networks. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(4), 598–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Quantitative linguistic research of contemporary Chinese. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1352478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-I-Cancho, R. (2004). Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056135. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., & Gibson, E. (2015). Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(33), 10336–10341. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502134112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, X., Huang, W., & Liu, H. (2023). The structural complexity of Chinese words and its relationship with word frequency. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 30(3–4), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2023.2231743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., & Altmann, G. (2005). Aims and methods of quantitative linguistics. In G. Altmann, V. Levickij, & V. Perebyinis (Eds.), Problems of quantitative linguistics (pp. 12–41). Ruta.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Fang, Y., Lv, Q., & Liu, H. (2017). Dependency distance differences across interpreting types: Implications for cognitive demand. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2008). Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), 159–191. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2008.9.2.159
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2010). Dependency direction as a means of word-order typology: A method based on dependency treebanks. Lingua, 120(6), 1567–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2017). An introduction to quantitative linguistics (in Chinese). The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2018a). Advances in quantitative linguistics (in Chinese). Zhejiang University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2018b). Language as a human-driven complex adaptive system. Physics of Life Reviews, 26–27, 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2022). Dependency relation and language networks (in Chinese). Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Xu, C., & Liang, J. (2017). Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, R., & Liu, H. (2022). Effects of syntactic distance and word order on language processing: An investigation based on a psycholinguistic treebank of English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(5), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09878-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiret, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Some quantitative aspects of written and spoken French based on syntactically annotated corpora. Journal of French Language Studies, 30(3), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269519000334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I.-I., Vidya, M. N., Uhlířová, L., Pustet, R., Mačutek, J., Krupa, V., Köhler, R., Jayaram, B. D., Grzybek, P., & Altmann, G. (2009). Word frequency studies. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics. (W. Baskin, Trans.). Philosophical Library. ( Original work published 1916)
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesnière, L. (2015). Elements of structural syntax. (T. Osborne & S. Kahane ( Trans.). John Benjamins. ( Original work published 1959)
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Guo, Y. (2018). Polyfunctionality studies in German, Dutch, English and Chinese. In L. Wang, R. Köhler, & A. Tuzzi (Eds.), Structure, function and process in texts (pp. 55–66). RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2019). The effects of source languages on syntactic structures of target languages in the simultaneous interpretation: A quantitative investigation based on dependency syntactic treebanks. Glottometrics, 45, 89–113. https://glottometrics.iqla.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/g45zeit.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, J. (2022). Morphology and word order in Slavic languages: Insights from annotated corpora. Voprosy Jazykoznanija, 4(4), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.31857/0373-658x.2021.4.131-159
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar