129
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Science and Special Education: A Foundational Relationship

&

References

  • Als-Nielsen, B., Chen, W., Gluud, C., & Kjaergard, L. L. (2003). Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: A reflection of treatment effect or adverse events? JAMA, 290(7), 921–928. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.7.921
  • Anastasiou, D., Burke, M. D., Wiley, A. L., & Kauffman, J. M. (2024). Special education’s telos: A tripartite approach.
  • Begeny, J. C., Eckert, T. L., Montarello, S. A., & Storie, M. S. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ reading abilities: An examination of the relationship between teachers’ judgments and students’ performance across a continuum of rating methods. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.43
  • Bicklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound: How Facilitated communication is Challenging Traditional Views of Autism and Ability/Disability. Teachers College Press.
  • Broekkamp, H., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2007). The gap between educational research and practice: A literature review, symposium, and questionnaire. Educational Research & Evaluation, 13(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701626127
  • Cook, B. G. (2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528995
  • Cornett, J., & Knackstedt, K. M. (2020). Original sin(s): Lessons learned from the US model of special education and an opportunity for leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 507–520.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Strengthening clinical preparation: The holy grail of teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2014.939009
  • Eckert, T. L., Dunn, E. K., Codding, R. S., Begeny, J. C., & Kleinmann, A. E. (2006). Assessment of mathematics and reading performance: An examination of the correspondence between direct assessment of student performance and teacher report. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20147
  • Englemann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Irvington Publishers.
  • Englemann, S., & Colvin, G. (2006). Rubric for identifying authentic direct instruction programs. Englemann Foundation.
  • Fine, C. (2006). A mind of its own: How your brain distorts and deceives. Icon.
  • Flower, A., McKenna, J. W., & Haring, C. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers? Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children & Youth, 61(2), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109
  • Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., Briere, D., & MacSuga-Gage, A. M. (2014). Pre-service teacher training in classroom management: A review of state accreditation policy and teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413507002
  • Gould, S. J. (1995). Curveball. In S. Fraser (Ed.), The bell curve wars (pp. 11–22). Basic Books.
  • Hanford, E. (2022- present). Sold a story: How teaching kids to read went so wrong. (audio podcast]. APM Reports. https://features.apmreports.org/sold-a-story/
  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
  • Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(7), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200702
  • Heshusius, L. (1994). Freeing ourselves from objectivity: Managing subjectivity or turning toward a participatory mode of consciousness? Educational Researcher, 23(3), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177221
  • Kauffman, J. M. (2011). Toward a science of education: The battle between rogue and real science. Full Court Press.
  • Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. (2022). American’s trust in science, other groups declines. Pew Research Group. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
  • Kerr, M. M., & Nelson, C. M. (2010). Strategies for addressing behavior problems in the classroom. Pearson.
  • Kida, T. (2006). Don’t believe everything you think: The 6 basic mistakes we make in thinking. Prometheus.
  • Krimsky, S. (2013). Do financial conflicts of interest bias research? An inquiry into the “funding effect” hypothesis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(4), 566–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912456271
  • Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Leko, M. M., Brownell, M. T., Sindelar, P. T., & Murphy, K. (2012). Promoting special education preservice teacher expertise. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17161/foec.v44i7.6684
  • Lower, S. (2009). Pseudoscience. What is it? How can I recognize it? www.chem1.com/acad/sci/pseudocie.html.
  • McIntosh, K., Mercer, S. H., Nese, R. N., & Ghemraoui, A. (2016). Identifying and predicting distinct patterns of implementation in a school-wide behavior support framework. Prevention Science, 17(8), 992–1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0700-1
  • Mostert, M. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy—twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462524
  • Oliver, R. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2010). Special education teacher preparation in classroom management: Implications for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 35(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291003500301
  • Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment and memory (pp. 79–96). Psychology Press.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly Reprinted online at Peirce.org. 12, 1–15. Retrieved July 12, 2010 http://www.pierce.org/writings/p107/html
  • Pew Research Center (2022, February 14). Public confidence in scientists has declined over the last year. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/ps_22-02-15_trust-declines_00-01/
  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
  • Resnik, D. B. (2000). Financial interests and research bias. Perspectives on Science, 8(3), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1162/106361400750340497
  • Scott, T. M. (2016). Teaching behavior: Managing classroom behavior with effective instruction. Corwin Press.
  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. Basic Books.
  • Taylor, J. L., & Sailor, W. (2023). A case for systems change in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 07419325231181385.
  • UChicago News. (2022). Confidence in science has grown among democrats since 2018, but decreased among republicans. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/trust-science-becoming-more-polarized-survey-finds
  • Walker, H. M. (2023). Solutions to critical behavioral issues in the classroom . Guilford Press.
  • Walker, H. M., & Gresham, F. M. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of evidence-based practices for emotional and behavioral disorders: Applications in schools. Guilford Press.
  • Yell, M. L., Meadows, N. B., Drasgow, E., & Shriner, J. G. (2013). Evidence-based practices for educating students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Pearson.
  • Ziegler, T. D. (2021). The anti-enlightenment tradition as a common framework of fascism and the contemporary far right. Fascism, 10(1), 16–51. https://doi.org/10.1163/22116257-10010001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.