Trajectories of the Anthropocene as a boundary concept bridging debates about climate change and ecological collapse (years 2000–2019)

References

• Adams, M. (2019) Indigenizing the Anthropocene? Specifying and situating multi-species encounters, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy. Volume ahead-of-print, Number ahead-of-print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (2009) From boundary concept to boundary object: The practice and politics of care pathway development, Social Science & Medicine, 69(3), pp. 354–361. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, L. (2019) AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software] (Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University). Available at: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software [accessed 8 February 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Maldonado, M. (2015) Spelling the End of nature? making sense of the Anthropocene, TELOS: Critical Theory of the Contemporary, 2015(172), pp. 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Autin, W. J. and Holbrook, J. H. (2012) Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture?, GSA Today, 22(7), pp. 60–61. doi:10.1130/G153GW.1
   Google Scholar
• Baskin, J. (2015) Paradigm dressed as epoch: The ideology of the Anthropocene, Environmental Values, 24(1), pp. 9–29. doi:10.3197/096327115X14183182353746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. A., Edgeworth, M., Edwards, L. E., Ellis, E. C., Gibbard, P. and Merritts, D. J. (2021) Anthropocene: Event or epoch?, Nature, 597(16), pp. 332. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02448-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2014) The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society: The case of ‘public engagement in science’, Public Understanding of Science, 23(3), pp. 238–253. doi:10.1177/0963662513515371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2021) Rethinking time in response to the Anthropocene: From timescales to timescapes, The Anthropocene Review, 9(2), pp. 206–219. doi:10.1177/20530196211006888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bińczyk, E. (2019) The most unique discussion of the 21st century? The debate on the Anthropocene pictured in seven points, The Anthropocene Review, 6(1–2), pp. 3–18. doi:10.1177/2053019619848215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C. and Fressoz, J. (2016) L’Événment anthropocène. La Terre, l’histoire et nous (Paris: Editions du Seuil).
   Google Scholar
• Bos, C., Walhout, B., Peine, A. and van Lente, H. (2014) Steering with big words: Articulating ideographs in research programs, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), pp. 151–170. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922732
   Google Scholar
• Brasseur, G. P. and van der Pluijm, B. (2013) Earth’s future: Navigating the science of the Anthropocene, Earth's Future, 1, pp. 1–2. doi:10.1002/2013EF000221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. (2004) Can genetics help US rethink communication? Public communication of science as a ‘double helix’, New Genetics and Society, 23(3), pp. 269–283. doi:10.1080/1463677042000305048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. (2014) Science and the Media: Alternative Routes to Scientific Communications, Vol. 1 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., Smith, D. S., Ren, X., Cao, H., Smith, S. and McFarland, D. A. (2023) How New ideas diffuse in science, American Sociological Review, 88(3), pp. ⁠1–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernilo, D. (2016) The question of the human in the Anthropocene debate, European Journal of Social Theory, 20(1), pp. 44–60. doi:10.1177/1368431016651874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, A., Fu, R., Harbor, J., Taylor, M. P. and Vanacker, V. (2013) Anthropocene: Human interactions with earth systems, Anthropocene, 1, pp. 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2013.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Chin, A., Gillson, L., Quiring, S. M., Nelson, D. R., Taylor, M. P., Vanacker, V. and Lovegrove, D. (2016) An evolving Anthropocene for science and society, Anthropocene, 13, pp. 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.ancene.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloi^tre, M. and Shinn, T. (1985) Expository practice: social, cognitive and epistemological linkages, in: T. Shinn and R. Whitley (Eds) Expository Science, pp. 31–60 (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay, The Sociological Review, 32, pp. 196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, D. (2009) The climate of history: Four theses, Critical Inquiry, 35(2), pp. 197–222. doi:10.1086/596640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, R. A., Correia, Z. C., Malhado, A. C. and Ladle, R. J. (2018) Pivotal 20th century contributions to the development of the Anthropocene concept: Overview and implications, Current Science, 115(10), pp. 1871–1875. doi:10.18520/cs/v115/i10/1871-1875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. and Stoermer, E. F. (2000) The Anthropocene, IGBP Newsletter, 41(1), pp. 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, J. P. (2002a) Geology of mankind, Nature, 415, pp. 23. doi:10.1038/415023a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2002b) The effects of industrial and agricultural practices on atmospheric chemistry and climate during the Anthropocene, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 37(4), pp. 423–424. doi:10.1081/ESE-120003224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. (2006) The Anthropocene, in: E. Ehlers and T. Krafft (Eds) Earth System Science in the Anthropocene: Emerging Issues and Problems, pp. 13–18 (New York: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J. and Steffen, W. (2003) How long have we been in the Anthropocene era?, Climatic Change, 61, pp. 251–257. doi:10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004708.74871.62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, P. J., Steffen, W. and McNeill, J. R. (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans Now overwhelming the great forces of nature, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), pp. 614–621. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. and Joerges, B. (1995) Winds of organizational change: How ideas translate into objects and actions, in: S. B. Bacharach, P. Gagliardi, and B. Mundell (Eds) Studies of Organization in the European Tradition, pp. 171–210 (Greenwich: JAI Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby, S. (2014) Rethinking geopolitics: Climate security in the Anthropocene, Global Policy, 5(1), pp. 1–9. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Sala, D. and Goldstein, M. (2017) Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 1st ed. (Amsterdam: Elsevier). (November 27).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2016) The Birth of the Anthropocene (Oakland: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Di Buccio, E., Cammozzo, A., Neresini F. and Zanatta, A. (2022) TIPS: Search and analytics for social science research, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Conference of the Information Retrieval Communities in Europe (CIRCLE 2022), CEUR-WS, 3178.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. C. (2018) Anthropocene. A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbard, P., Walker, M., Bauer, A., Edgeworth, M., Edwards, L., Ellis, E., Finney, S., Gill, J. L., Maslin, M., Merritts, D. and Ruddiman, W. (2022) The Anthropocene as an event, not an epoch, Journal of Quaternary Science, 37(3), pp. 395–399. doi:10.1002/jqs.3416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gren, M. and Huijbens, E. H. (2014) Tourism and the Anthropocene, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 14(1), pp. 6–22. doi:10.1080/15022250.2014.886100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, N. and Adsit-Morris, C. (2019) Troubling the Anthropocene: Donna Haraway, science fiction, and arts of Un/naming, Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(3), pp. 213–224. doi:10.1177/1532708619883311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grusin, R. (Ed.) (2017) Anthropocene Feminism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hallé, C. and Milon, A. S. (2020) The infinity of the Anthropocene: A (Hi)story with a thousand names, in: B. Latour and P. Weibel (Eds) Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth, pp. 44–49 (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., Stapleton, O. and Sauder, M. (2019) Public ideas: Their varieties and careers, American Sociological Review, 84(3), pp. 545–576. doi:10.1177/0003122419846628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2015) Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making Kin, Environmental Humanities, 6(1), pp. 159–165. doi:10.1215/22011919-3615934
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2016) Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Head, M. J., Zalasiewicz, J. A., Waters, C. N., Turner, S. D., Williams, M., Barnosky, A. D., Steffen, W., Wagreich, M., Haff, P. K., Syvitski, J., Leinfelder, R., Mccarthy, F. M. G., Rose, N. L., Wing, S. L., An, Z., Cearreta, A., Cundy, A., Fairchild, B., Han, I. J., Ivar Do, Y., Sul, J. A., Jeandel, C., Mcneill, J. R. and Summerhayes, C. P. (2022) The proposed Anthropocene Epoch/Series is underpinned by an extensive array of mid-20th century stratigraphic event signals, Journal of Quaternary Science, 37(7), pp. 1181–1187. doi:10.1002/jqs.3467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. (2018) Interscalar vehicles for an African Anthropocene: On waste, temporality, and violence, Cultural Anthropology, 33(1), pp. 109–141. doi:10.14506/ca33.1.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmig, D., Dean, C., Kurtz, M. and the Elementa Editorial and Production Team. (2013) Elementa: Science of the anthropocene – a new nonprofit, open-access journal publishing scientific research specific to the anthropocene in a multidisciplinary format, in: NOAA ESRL Global Monitoring Annual Conference, May 21, Colorado, Boulder.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. (1990) The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses, Social Studies of Science, 20(3), pp. 519–539. doi:10.1177/030631290020003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. and Jennings, P. D. (2018) -Political scenarios for Anthropocene society, Business & Society, 60(1), pp. 57–94. doi:10.1177/0007650318816468
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, M. (2019) Engendering the Anthropocene in Oceania: Fatalism, resilience, resistance, Cultural Studies Review, 25(2), pp. 172–195. doi:10.5130/csr.v25i2.6888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. M. and McDonald, F. P. (2018) A multimodal approach to the Anthropocene, American Anthropologist, 120(3), pp. 583–595. doi:10.1111/aman.13114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R. and Rotmans, J. (2009) Transitioning policy: Co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in The Netherlands, Policy Sciences, 42(4), pp. 303–322. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuchenius, A., Törnberg, P. and Uitermark, J. (2021) Adoption and adaptation: A computational case study of the spread of Granovetter's weak ties hypothesis, Social Networks, 66, pp. 10–25. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2021.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knitter, D., et al. (2019) Geography and the Anthropocene: Critical approaches needed, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 43(3), pp. 451–461. doi:10.1177/0309133319829395
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, S. (2015) Notes on the dramatic career of a concept, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 40(1), pp. 3–14. doi:10.1177/0304375415581245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992) Technology is society made durable, in: J. Law (Eds) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, pp. 103–131 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Leith, P. and Vanclay, F. (2015) Translating science to benefit diverse publics: Engagement pathways for linking climate risk, uncertainty, and agricultural identities, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6), pp. 939–964. doi:10.1177/0162243915577636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, B. V. (1995) From Fax to facts: Communication in the cold fusion saga, Social Studies of Science, 25, pp. 403–436. doi:10.1177/030631295025003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. L. and Maslin, M. A. (2018) The Human Planet. How We Created the Anthropocene (London: Penguin Books).
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R. and Waterton, C. (2016) Anthropocene – a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?, Environmental Sociology, 2(4), pp. 395–406. doi:10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841
   Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. (2017) A better Anthropocene?, Environmental Sociology, 3(3), pp. 167–172. doi:10.1080/23251042.2017.1357096
   Google Scholar
• Löwy, I. (1992) The strength of loose concepts—Boundary concepts, federative experimental strategies and disciplinary growth: The case of immunology, History of Science, 30(4), pp. 371–396. doi:10.1177/007327539203000402
   Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J. (2017) The Anthropo-scene: A guide for the perplexed, Social Studies of Science, 47(1), pp. 117–142. doi:10.1177/0306312716671039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malm, A. and Hornborg, A. (2014) The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative, The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), pp. 62–69. doi:10.1177/2053019613516291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, FMG,, Patterson, R. T., Head, M. J., Riddick, N. L., Cumming, B. F., Hamilton, P. B., Pisaric, M. F. J., Gushulak, A. C., Leavitt, P. R., Lafond, K. M., Llew-Williams, B., Marshall, M., Heyde, A., Pilkington, P. M., Moraal, J., Boyce, J. I., Nasser, N. A., Walsh, C., Garvie, M., Roberts, S., Rose, N. L., Cundy, A. B., Gaca, P., Milton, A., Hajdas, I., Crann, C. A., Boom, A., Finkelstein, S. A., McAndrews, J. H. and other members of Team Crawford. (2023) The varved succession of Crawford Lake, Milton, Ontario, Canada as a candidate Global boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Anthropocene series, The Anthropocene Review, 10(1), pp. 146–176. doi:10.1177/20530196221149281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. (2013) Between a rock and a hard place: The deficit model, the diffusion model and publics in STS, Science as Culture, 22(4), pp. 589–608. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.764068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2017) The Capitalocene, part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(3), pp. 594–630. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. (2018) The Capitalocene part II: Accumulation by appropriation and the centrality of unpaid work/energy, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(2), pp. 237–279. doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1272587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (2003) Discourse studies of scientific popularization: Questioning the boundaries, Discourse Studies, 5(2), pp. 265–279. doi:10.1177/1461445603005002006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neresini, F., Crabu, S. and Di Buccio, E. (2019) Tracking biomedicalization in the media: Public discourses on health and medicine in the UK and Italy, 1984–2017, Social Science & Medicine, 243, pp. 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, K. and Gogineni, B. (2018) The Anthropocene’s dating problem: Insights from the geosciences and the humanities, The Anthropocene Review, 5(2), pp. 107–119. doi:10.1177/2053019618784971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordblad, J. (2021) On the difference between Anthropocene and climate change temporalities, Critical Inquiry, 47(2), pp. 328–348. doi:10.1086/712123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, D. (2004) Spreading chaos: The role of popularizations in the diffusion of scientific ideas, Written Communication, 21(1), pp. 32–68. doi:10.1177/0741088303261035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, E. (2015) What sort of geographical education for the Anthropocene?, Geographical Research, 53(3), pp. 306–312. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. (2019) The Anthropocene: Between scientific controversy and political ambiguity, Agrochimica, Special Issue, pp. 279–285.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., Coromina, O. and Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2020) Mapping YouTube: A quantitative exploration of a platformed media system, First Monday, 25(8). doi:10.5210/fm.v25i8.10667
   Google Scholar
• Rull, V. (2017) The “Anthropocene”: Neglects, misconceptions, and possible futures, EMBO Reports, 18(7), pp. 1056–1060. doi:10.15252/embr.201744231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanha, A. (2019) A date with destiny: Racial capitalism and the beginnings of the Anthropocene, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 38(1), pp. 12–34. doi:10.1177/0263775819871964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti, C. (2019) The petrified Anthropocene, Theory, Culture & Society, 36(7–8), pp. 45–66. doi:10.1177/0263276419872814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, M. (2018) The Anthropocene as colonial discourse, Society and Space, 38(1), pp. 53–71.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2018) Replacing the Anthropocene, Encyclopaedia of the Anthropocene, 4, pp. 95–101. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.10485-9
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving, in: L. Gasser, and M. N. Huhn (Eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II, pp. 37–54 (London: Pitman).
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010) This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), pp. 601–617. doi:10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39, Social Studies of Science, 19(3), pp. 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W. (2006) The Anthropocene, global change and sleeping giants: Where on Earth are we going?, Carbon Balance and Management, 1(127), pp. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P. and McNeill, J. (2011) The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives, Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), pp. 842–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, M. 2019. Anthropocene now: influential panel votes to recognize Earth’s new epoch. Nature (News), May 21.
   Google Scholar
• Swindles, G. T., Watson, E., Turner, T. E., Galloway, J. M., Hadlari, T., Wheeler, J. and Bacon, K. L. (2015) Spheroidal carbonaceous particles are a defining stratigraphic marker for the Anthropocene, Scientific Reports, 5, pp. 10264. doi:10.1038/srep10264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, M. C. (2018) Should Naturalists believe in the Anthropocene?, Environmental Values, 28(3), pp. 367–383. doi:10.3197/096327119X15519764179845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, H. (2016) The Anthropocene, NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, 24, pp. 309–335. doi:10.1007/s00048-016-0146-3
   Google Scholar
• Veland, S. and Lynch, A. H. (2016) Scaling the Anthropocene: How the stories we tell matter, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 72, pp. 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, C. N. and Turner, S. D. (2022) Defining the onset of the Anthropocene, Science, 378(6621), pp. 706–708. doi:10.1126/science.ade2310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A. D., Poirier, C., Gałuszka, A., Cearreta, A., Edgeworth, M., Ellis, E. C., Ellis, M., Jeandel, C., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Richter, D., Steffen, W., Syvitski, J., Vidas, D., Wagreich, M., Williams, M., Zhisheng, A., Grinevald, J., Odada, E., Oreskes, N. and Wolf, A. P. (2016) The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene, Science, 351(6269), pp. 137–148. doi:10.1126/science.aad2622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Fairchild, I. J., Rose, N. L., Loader, N. J., Shotyk, W., Cearreta, A., Head, M. J., Syvitski, J. P. M., Williams, M., Wagreich, M., Barnosky, A. D., An, Z., Leinfelder, R., Jeandel, C., Gałuszka, A., Ivar do Sul, J. A., Gradstein, F., Steffen, W., McNeill, J. R., Wing, S., Poirier, C. and Edgeworth, M. (2018) Global boundary stratotype section and point (GSSP) for the Anthropocene series: where and how to look for potential candidates, Earth-Science Reviews, 178, pp. 379–429. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., Smith, A., Barry, T. L., Coe, A. L., Bown, P. R., Brenchley, P., Cantril, D., Gale, A., Gibbard, P., Gregory, F. J., Hounslow, M. W., Kerr, A. C., Pearson, P., Knox, R., Powell, J., Waters, C., Marshal, J., Oates, M., Rawson, P. and Stone, P. (2008) Are we now living in the Anthropocene, GSA Today, 18(2), pp. 4–8. doi:10.1130/GSAT01802A.1
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Ellis, E. C., Head, M. J., Vidas, D., Steffen, W., Thomas, J. A., Horn, E., Summerhayes, C. P., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J. R., Gałuszka, A., Williams, M., Barnosky, A. D., Richter, D., Gibbard, P. L., Syvitski, J., Jeandel, C., Cearreta, A., Cundy, A. B., Fairchild, I. J., Rose, N. L., Ivar do Sul, J. A., Shotyk, W., Turner, S., Wagreich, M. and Zinke, J. (2021) The Anthropocene: Comparing Its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines, Earth's Future, 9(3), pp. 1–25. doi:10.1029/2020EF001896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C. N., Williams, M., Barnosky, A. D., Cearreta, A., Crutzen, P., Ellis, E., Ellis, M. A., Fairchildg, I. J., Grinevald, J., Haff, P. K., Hajdas, I., Leinfelder, R., McNeill, J., Odada, E. O., Poirier, C., Richter, D., Steffen, W., Summerhayes, C., Syvitski, J. P. M., Vidas, D., Wagreicht, M., Wing, S. L., Wolfe, A. P., Zhisheng, A. and Oreskes, N. (2015) When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal, Quaternary International, 383(5), pp. 196–203. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2014.11.045
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A. and Ellis, M. (2011) The Anthropocene: A New epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 369, pp. 835–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar