475
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Between the lab and the Wild: Establishing the Potential of Gene Drive Mosquitoes for Malaria Control

ORCID Icon

References

  • Beisel, U. and Boëte, C. (2013) The flying public health tool: genetically modified mosquitoes and malaria control, Science as Culture, 22(1), pp. 38–60.
  • Bennett, P. (2019) Reinventing mosquito control. experimental trials and nonscalable relations in the Florida keys, in: K. Bardosh (Eds) Locating Zika. Social Change and Governance in an Age of Mosquito Pandemics, pp. 195–213 (London: Routledge).
  • Besansky, N. J., et al. (1994) Molecular phylogeny of the anopheles gambiae complex suggests genetic introgression between principal malaria vectors, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91(15), pp. 6885–6888.
  • Birn, A. (2005) Gates’s grandest challenge: transcending technology as public health ideology, The Lancet, 366(9484), pp. 514–519.
  • Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and Van Lente, H. (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), pp. 285–298.
  • Callaway, E. (2016) “Gene drive” Moratorium Shot Down at UN Biodiversity Meeting, Nature, December 21.
  • Cueto, M. (2013) A return to the magic bullet?, in: J. Biehl, and A. Petryna (Eds) When People Come First: Critical Studies in Global Health, pp. 30–53. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Delgado, A. (2016) Assembling desires: synthetic biology and the wish to Act at a distant time, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(5), pp. 914–934.
  • Dupé, S. (2015) Transformer pour contrôler, Revue D’anthropologie des Connaissances, 9(2), pp. 213–236.
  • Esvelt, K. M., Smidler, A. L., Catteruccia, F. and Church, G. M. (2014) Emerging technology: concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations, eLife, 3, pp. e03401.
  • Friese, C. (2013) Realizing potential in translational medicine: The uncanny emergence of care as science, Current Anthropology, 54(S7), pp. S129–S138.
  • Helmreich, S. (2007) Blue-Green capital, biotechnological circulation and an oceanic imaginary: A critique of biopolitical economy, BioSocieties, 2(3), pp. 287–302.
  • Jensen, C. B. (2020) A flood of models: Mekong ecologies of comparison, Social Studies of Science, 50(1), pp. 76–93.
  • Kelly, A. H. and Beisel, U. (2011) Neglected malarias: The frontlines and back alleys of global health, BioSocieties, 6(1), pp. 71–87.
  • Kelly, A. H. and Lezaun, J. (2017) The wild indoors: room-spaces of scientific inquiry, Cultural Anthropology, 32(3), pp. 367–398.
  • Kohler, R. (1994) Lords of the Fly. Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Kohler, R. (2002) Landscapes and Labscapes. Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Lezaun, J. (2006) Creating a New object of government: making genetically modified organisms traceable, Social Studies of Science, 36(4), pp. 499–531.
  • Lezaun, J. and Porter, N. (2015) Containment and competition: transgenic animals in the One health agenda, Social Science & Medicine, 129, pp. 96–105.
  • Mehrabi, T. 2016. Making Death Matter : A Feminist Technoscience Study of Alzheimer’s Sciences in the Laboratory, Doctoral Dissertation, Linköping University, 2016.
  • Meskus, M. (2018) Craft in Biomedical Research (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Mitchell, T. (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Durham: Duke University Press).
  • Nading, A. M. (2015a) Chimeric globalism: global health in the shadow of the dengue vaccine: chimeric globalism, American Ethnologist, 42(2), pp. 356–370.
  • Nading, A. M. (2015b) The lively ethics of global health GMOs: The case of the oxitec mosquito, BioSocieties, 10(1), pp. 24–47.
  • Nelson, N. C. (2018) Model Behavior. Animal Experiments, Complexity, and the Genetics of Psychiatric Disorders (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
  • Quinlan, M., et al. (2018) Studies of transgenic mosquitoes in disease-endemic countries: preparation of containment facilities, Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 18(1), pp. 21–30.
  • Reinert, H. (2012) The disposable surplus: notes on waste, reindeer, and biopolitics, Laboratorium, 4(3), pp. 67–83.
  • Reis-Castro, L. (2021) Becoming without, Environmental Humanities, 13(2), pp. 323–347.
  • Samimian-Darash, L. and Rabinow, P. (2015) Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropological Cases (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
  • Stengers, I. (2005) The cosmopolitical proposal, in: B. Latour, and P. Weibel (Eds) Making Things Public, pp. 994–1003 (Cambridge: MIT Press).
  • Taussig, K., Hoeyer, K. and Helmreich, S. (2013) The anthropology of potentiality in biomedicine, Current Anthropology, 54(S7), pp. S3–14.
  • Tsing, A. L. (2012) On nonscalability, Common Knowledge, 18(3), pp. 505–524.
  • Tsing, A. (2015) The Mushroom at the End of the World (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Valve, H. and Kauppila, J. (2008) Enacting closure in the environmental control of genetically modified organisms, Journal of Environmental Law, 20(3), pp. 339–362.
  • Wanderer, E. (2018) The axolotl in global circuits of knowledge production: Producing multispecies potentiality, Cultural Anthropology, 33(4), pp. 650–667.
  • World Health Organization. (2022) World Malaria Report 2022 (Geneva: World Health Organization).