Introduction: digital participatory biodiversity science

References

• Barley, S. R. and Bechky, B. A. (1994) In the backrooms of science the work of technicians in science labs, Work and Occupations, 21(1), pp. 85–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borie, M., Mahony, M., Obermeister, N. and Hulme, M. (2021) Knowing like a global expert organization: comparative insights from the IPCC and IPBES, Global Environmental Change, 68, pp. 102261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. (2000) Biodiversity, datadiversity, Social Studies of Science, 30(5), pp. 643–102683. DOI:10.1177/030631200030005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (1999) Sorting Things out (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009) Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la démocratie technique (Paris: Seuil).
   Google Scholar
• Charonnet, E. 2019. De prises en (sur)prises, l’attachement du lépidoptériste ou comment « contacter » un papillon, ethnographiques.org, n° 38. Available at https://www.ethnographiques.org.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. and Evans, R. (2007) Rethinking Expertise (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Coopmans, C., Vertesi, J., Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (2014) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Couvet, D. and Prevot, A. C. (2015) Citizen-science programs: towards transformative biodiversity governance, Environmental Development, 13, pp. 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, J. (2018) Le travail invisible des données (Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines).
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, S. and Franzen, M. (2016) The “problem of extension” revisited: new modes of digital participation in science, Journal of Science Communication, 15, pp. 1. Available at https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/01/JCOM_1501_2016_A06.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N., Mayernik, M. S., Batcheller, A. L., Bowker, G. C. and Borgman, C. L. (2011) Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration, Social Studies of Science, 41(5), pp. 667–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1996) Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fortun, K. (2012) Biopolitics and the informating of environmentalism, in: K. S Rajan (Eds) Lively Capital: Biotechnologies, Ethics, and Governance in Global Markets, pp. 306–326 (Durham: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1994) Dits et écrits IV (Paris: Gallimard).
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2016) Program Earth (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H. and Barratt, B. (2016) Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories, Big Data & Society, 3(2).
   Google Scholar
• Granjou, C., Mauz, I., Barbier, M. and Breucker, P. (2014) Making taxonomy environmentally relevant: insights for an all taxa biodiversity inventory, Environmental Science and Policy, 38, pp. 254–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2020/1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, in: C. McCann, S. Ki, and E. Ergun (Eds) Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives, pp. 303–310 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Haywood, B. K. (2014) A “sense of place” in public participation in scientific research, Science Education, 98(1), pp. 64–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, L. (2018) La standardisation et la générification; le cas de eBird, in: L. Heaton, F. Millerand, P. Dias da Silva, and S. Proulx (Eds) La reconfiguration du travail scientifique en biodiversité : pratiques amateurs et technologies numériques, pp. 131–145 (Montreal: Presses Universitaires de Montréal).
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, L., Millerand, F., da Silva P., D. and Proulx, S. (2018) La reconfiguration du travail scientifique en biodiversité : pratiques amateurs et technologies numériques (Montréal: Presses Universitaires de Montréal).
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008) Systematics as Cyberscience: Computers, Change, and Continuity in Science (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hobern, D., Baptiste, B., Copas, K., Guralnick, R., Hahn, A., van Huis, E., et al. (2019) Connecting data and expertise: a new alliance for biodiversity knowledge, Biodiversity. Data Journal, 7. doi:10.3897/BDJ.7.e33679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelling, S., Hochachka, W. M., Fink, D., Riedewald, M., Caruana, R., Ballard, G. and Hooker, G. (2009) Data-intensive science: a new paradigm for biodiversity studies, BioScience, 59(7), pp. 613–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. H. and Kinchy, A. (2016) Citizen science: probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. engaging science, Technology, and Society, 2, pp. 331–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, A. H. and Kinchy, A. (2019) Science by the People: Participation, Power and the Politics of Environmental Knowledge (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, R. E. (2002) Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1995) The “pédofil” of Boa Vista, Common Knowledge, 4(1), pp. 144–187.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1997) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science (London: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. and Law, J. (1990) Lists, field guides, and the descriptive organization of seeing: birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity, in: M. Lynch, and S. Woolgar (Eds) Representation in Scientific Practice, pp. 267–299 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. and Woolgar, S. (1990) Representation in Scientific Practice (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, S. et al. (2018) Citizen science technologies and new opportunities for participation, in Hecker, S. et al. (Eds) Citizen Science, Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, pp. 303-320, (London, UCL Press).
   Google Scholar
• Millerand, F., Heaton, L. and Myles, D. (2018) Les reconfigurations sociales de l'expertise sur internet, in: F. Claveau, and J Prud'homme (Eds) Experts, sciences et sociétés, pp. 151–173 (Montreal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G., Chandler, M., Clyde, M., McGreavy, B., Haklay, M., Ballard, H., … Gallo, J. (2017) Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making, Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S. and Crowston, K. (2012) The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), pp. 298–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in the age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pfister, D. S. (2011) Networked expertise in the era of many-to-many communication: On Wikipedia and invention, Social Epistemology, 3(25), pp. 217–231.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1992) Science as Practice and Culture (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Polleri, M. (2019) Conflictual collaboration: citizen science and governance of radioactive contamination after fukushima nuclear disaster, American Ethnologist, 46(2), pp. 214–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., Williams, R. and D’Adderio, L. (2007) Global software and its provenance: generification work in the production of organizational software packages, Social Studies of Science, 37(2), pp. 254–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1989) The invisible technician, American Scientist, 7, pp. 554–563.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1989) The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving, in: R. Gasser, and M. N. Huhns (Eds) Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 37–54 (San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann).
   Google Scholar
• Sterner, B. W., Gilbert, E. E. and Franz, N. M. (2020) Decentralized but globally coordinated biodiversity data, Frontiers in Big Data, 3, pp. 519133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strasser, B. J. (2019) Collecting Experiments (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N. and Louder, E. (2020) The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, pp. 15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertesi, J. and Ribes, D. (2019) Digital STS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, C., Ellis, R. and Wynne, B. (2013) Barcoding Nature: Shifting Cultures of Taxonomy in an Age of Biodiversity Loss (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1996) May sheep safely graze?: A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide, in: S. Lash, B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne (Eds) Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, pp. 44–83 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Youatt, R. (2008) Counting species: biopower and the global biodiversity census, Environmental Values, 17, pp. 393–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar