References
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
- Brown, J. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), 313–342.
- Chen, J. J. (2014). Stakeholder accountability in the Australian not-for-profit sector [Doctoral thesis, Macquarie University]. Macquarie University Research Online. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/1138390.
- Considine, M. (2002). The end of the line? Accountable governance in the age of networks, partnerships, and joined-up services. Governance, 15(1), 21–40.
- Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: serving, not steering. Routledge.
- Dormer, R., & Ward, S. (2018). Accountability and public governance in New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington. http://hdl.handle.net/10063/7002.
- Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.
- Geer, B. W., Maher, J. K., & Cole, M. T. (2008). Managing non-profit organizations: The importance of transformational leadership and commitment to operating standards for non-profit accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(1), 51–75.
- Hodges, R. (2012). Joined-up government and the challenges to accounting and accountability researchers. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 26–51.
- Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.
- Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2014). Accountable Networks. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability (pp. 243–257). Oxford University Press.
- Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. M. (2015). Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.
- Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2012). The new public governance in public service delivery. Eleven International Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/93164.
- Lee, S. (2022). When tensions become opportunities: managing accountability demands in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 641–655.
- Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), 47–90.
- Morris, M. H., & Jones, F. F. (1999). Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of the public sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91.
- Mulgan, R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.
- O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2007). From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organizations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 446–471.
- Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.
- Raynard, P. (1998). Coming together. A review of contemporary approaches to social accounting, auditing and reporting in non-profit organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(13), 1471–1479.
- Roberts, J., & Scapens, R. (1985). Accounting systems and systems of accountability—Understanding accounting practices in their organizational contexts. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 10(4), 443–456.
- Robertson, G. (2019). Bringing wellbeing into the Public Finance Act. The Beehive. https://www.beehive.govt.nz/speech/bringing-wellbeing-public-finance-act.
- Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238.
- Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton University Press.
- Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19(1-2), 75–87.
- Waardenburg, M., Martijn, G., Jorrit de, J., & Keijser, B. (2020). Paradoxes of collaborative governance: Investigating the real-life dynamics of multi-agency collaborations using a quasi-experimental action-research approach. Public Management Review, 22(3), 386–407.