New development: Relational public services—reform and research agenda

References

• Baines, S., Wilson, R., Fox, C., Narbutaite Aflaki, I., Bassi, A., Aramo-Immonen, H., & Prandini, R. (eds.). (2024). Co-creation in public services for innovation and social justice (1st edn). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2020). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1324–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), i21–i40. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, M., & Sanabria, L. F. (2019). The poverty stoplight and its psychosocial and multidimensional approach. In V. Ximenes, MouraJr.J., E. Cidade, & B. Nepomuceno (Eds.), Psychosocial implications of poverty. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. (2022). Reconstructing citizenship (again). Citizenship Studies, 26(4-5), 411–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (2012). The relational state: How recognising the importance of human relationships could revolutionise the role of the state. Institute for Public Policy Research. https://ippr-org.files.svdcdn.com/production/Downloads/relational-state_Nov2012_9888.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cornford, J., Wilson, R., Baines, S., & Richardson, R. (2013). Local governance in the new information ecology: The challenge of building interpretative communities. Public Money & Management, 33(3), 201–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottam, H. (2018). Radical help. How we can remake the relationships between us and revolutionise the welfare state. Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvidge, J. (2013). The enabling state: a discussion paper. Carnegie UK Trust.
   Google Scholar
• French, M., Hesselgreaves, H., Wilson, R., Hawkins, M., & Lowe, T. (2023). Harnessing complexity for better outcomes in public and non-profit services. Policy Press. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/monobook-oa/book/9781447364139/9781447364139.xml.
   Google Scholar
• French, M., Kimmitt, J., Wilson, R., Jamieson, D., & Lowe, T. (2023). Social impact bonds and public service reform: Back to the future of New Public Management? International Public Management Journal, 26(3), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2050859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, M., & Mollinger-Sahba, A. (2021). Making performance management relevant in complex and inter-institutional contexts: Using outcomes as performance attractors. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(3), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2020-0071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover, B. (2023). Recovery through reform: launch paper of the future public services taskforce. Demos. https://demos.co.uk/research/recovery-through-reform-launch-paper-of-the-future-public-services-taskforce/.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. F. (2005). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (translated by Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G.) Lawrence & Wishart Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J., & Kabourek, S. E. (2019). Pay-for-success development in the United States: Feasible or failing to launch? Public Administration Review, 79(6), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselgreaves, H., French, M., Hawkins, M., Lowe, T., Wheatman, A., Martin, M., & Wilson, R. (2021). New development: The emerging role of a ‘learning partner’ relationship in supporting public service reform. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 573–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1909274
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. (2011). Open public services white paper. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd5bb40f0b65b3de0b746/OpenPublicServices-WhitePaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, D. (2021). Supportive management practice and intrinsic motivation go together in the public service. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(13).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. L., Baekgaard, M., Moynihan, D. P., & van Loon, N. (2018). Making sense of performance regimes: rebalancing external accountability and internal learning. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx001
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D., Wilson, R., Martin, M., Lowe, T., Kimmitt, J., Gibbon, J., & French, M. (2020). Data for outcome payments or information for care? A sociotechnical analysis of the management information system in the implementation of a social impact bond. Public Money & Management, 40(3), 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., & Miller, P. (eds.). (2024). The resilience of new public management. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lent, A., & Studdert, J. (2021). The community paradigm: why public services need radical change and how it can be achieved. New Local. https://www.newlocal.org.uk/publications/the-community-paradigm/.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., Brogan, A., Eichsteller, G., Hawkins, M., Hesselgreaves, H., Plimmer, D., Terry, V., Sharfe, L., Cox, J., French, M., Hill, B., Masters, J., Norman, R., Sanderson, H., Smith, M., & Wilson, R. (2021a). Human learning systems: Public service for the real world. ThemPra Social Pedagogy. https://realworld.report/.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., French, M., Hawkins, M., Hesselgreaves, H., & Wilson, R. (2021b). New development: Responding to complexity in public services—the human learning systems approach. Public Money & Management, 41(7), 573–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, T., & Wilson, R. (2017). Playing the game of outcomes-based performance management. Is gamesmanship inevitable? Evidence from theory and practice. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 981–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackeith, J. (2014). Assessing the reliability of the outcomes star in research and practice. Housing, Care and Support, 17(4), 188–197.
   Google Scholar
• McLinden, C., & Fyans, J. (2023). Level measures: A modern agenda for public service integration. Localis.
   Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, I., & Wilson, R. (2013). Digital government at work. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monsen, K. A., & De Blok, J. (2013). Buurtzorg: nurse-led community care. Creative Nursing, 19(3), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.19.3.122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muir, R., & Parker, I. (2014). Many to many: How the relational state will transform public services Institute for Public Policy Reform. https://www.ippr.org/files/images/media/files/publication/2014/02/Many-to-many_Feb2014_11865.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Mangan, C. (2016). The 21st-century public servant: working at three boundaries of public and private. Public Money & Management, 36(4), 265–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2020). Public service logic: creating value for public service users, citizens, and society through public service delivery. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003009153
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). Introduction: The (new) public governance: a suitable case for treatment? In The new public governance? (pp. 17–32). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pell, C., Wilson, R., & Lowe, T. (2016). Kittens are evil: heresies in public policy. Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pell, C., Wilson, R., Lowe, T., & Myers, J. (2020). Kittens are evil 2: heresies in public policy. Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., Laurent, B., Papageorgiou, K., & Stilgoe, J. (2022). The politics of scaling. Social Studies of Science, 52(1), 3–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). Counting, control and calculation: reflections on measuring and management. Human Relations, 57(6), 765–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2020). Bespoke by Default: Future of Public Services. In C. Pell, R. Wilson, T. Lowe, & J. Myers (Eds.), Kittens are evil 2: Little heresies in public policy. Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2012). On Nonscalability: the living world is not amenable to precision-nested scales. Common Knowledge, 18(3), 505–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J. B., Archibald, T., Hargraves, M., Buckley, J., Hebbard, C., Linver, M. R., & Trochim, W. M. (2021). Introduction to relational systems evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2021(169), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/ukhe/product/engaged-scholarship-9780199226306.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, L., Hawkins, M., French, M., Lowe, T., & Hesselgreaves, H. (2023). New development: Learning communities—an approach to dismantling barriers to collective improvement. Public Money & Management, 43(4), 374–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2116179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., Cornford, J., Baines, S., & Mawson, J. (2011). Information for localism? policy sense-making for local governance. Public Money & Management, 31(4), 295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar