677
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Structural power imbalances in global organisations: analysing IT governance from a postcolonial perspective

, , &
Received 15 May 2023, Accepted 27 Feb 2024, Published online: 07 Mar 2024

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2008). Principles and models for organizing the IT function. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(1), 1–16.
  • Ahlemann, F., Dittes, S., Fillbrunn, T., Rehring, K., Reining, S., & Urbach, N. (2022). Managing In-company IT standardization: A design theory. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10277-2
  • Ailon, G., & Kunda, G. (2009). `The one-company approach’: Transnationalism in an Israeli—Palestinian subsidiary of a multinational corporation. Organization Studies, 30(7), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104808
  • Alcaraz, J. M., Domènech, M., & Tirado, F. (2012). eHR software, multinational corporations and emerging China: Exploring the role of information through a postcolonial lens. Information and Organization, 22(2), 106–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.01.004
  • Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2020). The problematizing review: A counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1290–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12582
  • Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2023). The art of phenomena construction: A framework for coming up with research phenomena beyond ‘the usual suspects’. Journal of Management Studies, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12969
  • Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1998). Key concepts in post-colonial studies (1st ed.). Routledge.
  • Avgerou, C.(2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146.
  • Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., & Tapanainen, T. (2020). Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1718007
  • Bajorek, J. P. (2019). Voice recognition still has significant race and gender biases. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/05/voice-recognition-still-has-significant-race-and-gender-biases
  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., & Thomas, D. (2001). manifesto for agile software development. https://agilemanifesto.org/
  • Bhabha, H. (1984). Of mimicry and man: The ambivalence of colonial discourse. October, 28, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.2307/778467
  • Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
  • Bobby Banerjee, S., & Prasad, A. (2008). Introduction to the special issue on “critical reflections on management and organizations: A postcolonial perspective”. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422040810869963
  • Boussebaa, M., Morgan, G., & Sturdy, A. (2012). Constructing global firms? National, transnational and neocolonial effects in international management consultancies. Organization Studies, 33(4), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443454
  • Brown, A. E., & Grant, G. G. (2005). Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01538
  • Burkart, C., Wakolbinger, T., & Toyasaki, F. (2018). Funds allocation in NPOs: The role of administrative cost ratios. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 26(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-017-0512-9
  • Bygstad, B.(2017). Generative innovation: A comparison of lightweight and heavyweight it. Journal of Information Technology, 32(2), 180–193.
  • Cavazos, J. G., Phillips, P. J., Castillo, C. D., & O’Toole, A. J. (2021). Accuracy comparison across face recognition algorithms: Where are we on measuring race bias? IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science, 3(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBIOM.2020.3027269
  • Charity So White. (2022). charity so white: tackling institutional racism in the charity sector. https://charitysowhite.org/
  • Cheema, G. S., & Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Decentralizing governance: Emerging concepts and practices (1st ed.). Brookings Institution Press.
  • Chen, Y., Liu, H., & Chen, M. (2022). Achieving novelty and efficiency in business model design: Striking a balance between IT exploration and exploitation. Information & Management, 59(3), 103268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103268
  • Chen, L., Tong, T. W., Tang, S., & Han, N. (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. Journal of Management, 48(1), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211045023
  • Chipidza, W., & Leidner, D. (2017). ICT4D research – literature review and conflict perspective. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).
  • Chipidza, W., & Leidner, D. (2019). A review of the ICT-enabled development literature: Towards a power parity theory of ICT4D. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.002
  • Chi, M., Zhao, J., George, J. F., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2017). The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.007
  • Cho, W., & Shaw, M. (2009). Does IT synergy matter in IT portfolio selection? In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/160
  • Chughtai, H., Myers, M. D., Young, A. G., Borsa, T., Cardo, V., Demirkol, Ö., Morgan, C., Morton, S., Prior, C., Wilkin, J., Young, E., & Özkula, S. M. (2020). Demarginalizing interdisciplinarity in is research: Interdisciplinary research in marginalization. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 296–315. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04613
  • Da Veiga, A., & Eloff, J. H. P. (2007). An information security governance framework. Information Systems Management, 24(4), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530701586136
  • Ein-Dor, P., & Segev, E. (1982). organizational context and mis structure: some empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 6(3), 55. https://doi.org/10.2307/248656
  • Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025539
  • Epstein, C. (2014). The postcolonial perspective: An introduction. International Theory, 6(2), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219
  • Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
  • Fanon, F. (2008). Black skin, white masks. Grove Press.
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Fowler, A., & Mati, J. M. (2019). African gifting: Pluralising the concept of philanthropy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00079-z
  • Frewer, T. (2013). Doing NGO work: The politics of being ‘civil society’ and promoting ‘good governance’ in Cambodia. Australian Geographer, 44(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2013.765350
  • Godefroid, M., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2023). Identifying key barriers to nonprofit organizations’ adoption of technology innovations. Nonprofit Mgmnt & Ldrshp, Artikel, 21609. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21609
  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebook. International Publishers.
  • Gregory, R. W., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. J. (2018). IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1225–1253.
  • Gregory, R. W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mähring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0554
  • Grover, V. (2022). Digital agility: Responding to digital opportunities. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(6), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2096492
  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
  • Haes, S. D., & van Grembergen, W. (2005). IT governance structures, processes and relational mechanisms: Achieving IT/Business alignment in a major Belgian financial group. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.362
  • Haffke, I., Kalgovas, B., & Benlian, A. (2017). Options for transforming the IT function using bimodal IT. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(2). https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol16/iss2/2
  • Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527458
  • Horlach, B., Drews, P., Schirmer, I., & Boehmann, T. (2017). Increasing the agility of IT delivery: Five types of bimodal IT organization. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Huff, S., Maher, P., & Munro, M. (2008). Information Technology and the board of directors: Is there an IT attention deficit? MIS Quarterly Executive, 5(2). https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol5/iss2/3
  • Hylving, L., & Bygstad, B. (2019). Nuanced responses to enterprise architecture Management: Loyalty, voice, and exit. Journal of Management Information Systems, 36(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550549
  • Jackson, L., & Adarlo, G. (2016). Bridging cultures through unpaid labor: US volunteer teachers’ experiences in China’s Yunnan Province. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2330–2352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9519-1
  • Jimenez, A., Abbott, P., & Dasuki, S. (2022). In-betweenness in ICT4D research: Critically examining the role of the researcher. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(1), 25–39. ht tps://dx.d oi.org/10520/EJC-17c9e615bd
  • Johnston, A. C., & Hale, R. (2009). Improved security through information security governance. Communications of the ACM, 52(1), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1145/1435417.1435446
  • Johnston, A. C., & Warkentin, M. (2010). Fear appeals and information security behaviors: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 34(3), 549. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750691
  • Kagee, A. (2019). Postcolonial theory and international relations. African Journal of Democracy and Governance, 6(1).
  • Kane, C., Young, A., Majchrzak, A., & Ransbotham, S. B. (2021). Avoiding an oppressive future of machine learning: A design theory for emancipatory assistants. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/1578
  • Kerner, I. (2018). Postcolonial theories as global critical theories. PRAXIS International, 25(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12346
  • King, W. R., & Torkzadeh, G. (2008). Information systems offshoring: Research status and issues. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32(2), 205. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148838
  • Koch, H., Yan, J., Zhang, S., Milic, N., & Curry, P. (2019). How consumer technology is changing the IT function: A multi-case study of three fortune 500 companies. Information Systems Management, 36(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2019.1652443
  • Konyndyk, J., & Worden, R. (2019). People-driven response: Power and participation in humanitarian action: CGD policy paper 155. Center for Global Development.
  • Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Bertin, E. (2018). From sovereign IT governance to liberal IT governmentality? A Foucauldian analogy. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1473932
  • Lin, C. I. C., Kuo, F. -Y., & Myers, M. D. (2009). ICT for development: Two contradictory stories of an ICT initiative. In Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS).
  • Lin, C. I. C., Kuo, F. -Y., & Myers, M. D. (2015). Extending ICT4D studies: The value of critical research. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 39(3), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.09
  • Loomba, A. (2015). Colonialism/postcolonialism. In New critical idiom (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Lowry, P. B., & Wilson, D. (2016). Creating agile organizations through IT: The influence of internal IT service perceptions on IT service quality and IT agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 25(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.05.002
  • Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., & Melin, U. (2020). A pathology of public sector IT governance: How IT governance configuration counteracts ambidexterity. In G. V. Pereira, M. Janssen, H. Lee, I. Lindgren, M. P. Rodríguez, H. J. Scholl, & A. Zuiderwijk (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science. Electronic government (Vol. 12219, pp. 29–41). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_3
  • Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., & Päivärinta, T. (2020). Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: Enacting ambidextrous IT governance in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740617
  • Maimbo, H., & Pervan, G. (2005). Designing a case study protocol for application in is research. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 45(1). Cambridge, MA, US: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04502
  • Makuwira, J. (2018). Power and development in practice: NGOs and the development agenda setting. Development in Practice, 28(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1433816
  • Masiero, S. (2021). Decolonising critical theory in information systems: A subaltern approach. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings.
  • Masiero, S. (2023). Decolonising critical information systems research: A subaltern approach. Information Systems Journal, 33(2), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12401
  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1822-0
  • McLeod, J. (2000). Beginning postcolonialism. Manchester University Press.
  • McVeigh, K. (2020). Médecins Sans Frontières is ‘institutionally racist’, say 1,000 insiders. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/10/medecins-sans-frontieres-institutionally-racist-medical-charity-colonialism-white-supremacy-msf
  • Melville, K., Kraemer K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
  • Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
  • Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541
  • Mio, C., Panfilo, S., & Blundo, B. (2020). Sustainable development goals and the strategic role of business: A systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3220–3245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2568
  • Myers, M. D., Chughtai, H., Davidson, L., Tsibolane, P., & Young, A. G. (2020). Studying the other or becoming the other: Engaging with indigenous peoples in is research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 47, 382–396. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04718
  • Myers, M. D., Chughtai, H., Davidson, E. J., & Young, A. (2019). Studying the other or becoming the other: Engaging with indigenous peoples in is research. In Proceedings of the International conference on information systems (ICIS).
  • Myers, M. D., & Klein, H. K. (2011). A set of principles for conducting critical research in information systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 35(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043487
  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200414211
  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Baroudi, J. J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.1.1
  • Ortiz, J., Young, A., Myers, M. D., Bedeley, R. T., Carbaugh, D., Chughtai, H., Davidson, E., George, J., Gogan, J., Gordon, S., Grimshaw, E., Leidner, D. E., Pulver, M., & Wigdor, A. (2019). Giving voice to the voiceless: The use of digital technologies by marginalized groups. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20–38.
  • Pal, M., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2013). Breaking the myth of Indian call centers: A postcolonial analysis of resistance. Communication Monographs, 80(2), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.776172
  • Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  • Pansera, M. (2018). Frugal or fair? The unfulfilled promises of frugal innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(4), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1148
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1978). Pragmatism and abduction. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers (Vol. V, p. 180 212).
  • Peterson, R. (2004). Crafting information technology governance. Information Systems Management, 21(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/44705.21.4.20040901/84183.2
  • Peterson, R., Ribbers, P., & O’Callaghan, R. (2000). Information technology governance by design: Investigating hybrid configurations and integration mechanisms. In Proceedings of the International conference of information systems (ICIS).
  • Prasad, A., Heales, J., & Green, P. (2010). A capabilities-based approach to obtaining a deeper understanding of information technology governance effectiveness: Evidence from IT steering committees. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(3), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2010.07.013
  • Radojev, H. (2017). oxfam international reaches agreement to move headquarters to nairobi. civilsociety.co.uk. https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/oxfam-reaches-agreement-to-move-headquarters-to-nairobi.html
  • Rai, A., & Tang, X. (2014). Research commentary —information technology-enabled business models: A conceptual framework and a coevolution perspective for future research. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0495
  • Ravishankar, M. N., Pan, S. L., & Myers, M. D. (2013). Information technology offshoring in India: A postcolonial perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.32
  • Ray, G., Muhanna, W. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 625. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148703
  • Rennstich, J. K. (2008). The making of a digital world. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611061
  • Romano, R., John, B., MacKrell, D., Qureshi, S., Applebee, W., & Copeman, P. (2023). Indigenizing the It Curriculum by Design. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 53(1), 364–397. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05315
  • Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the orient. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
  • Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the is discipline: Its historical legacy and its continued relevance. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13747
  • Sayed, Z., & Agndal, H. (2022). Offshore outsourcing of R&D to emerging markets: Information systems as tools of neo-colonial control. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 18(3), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/cpoib-07-2020-0089
  • Schlosser, F., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., & Wagner, H.-T. (2015). Achieving social alignment between business and IT – an empirical evaluation of the efficacy of IT governance mechanisms. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.2
  • Schultze, U., & Avital, M. (2011). Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2010.11.001
  • Schwabenland, C., & Tomlinson, F. (2008). Managing diversity or diversifying management? Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2/3), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/17422040810870033
  • Sheombar, A., Urquhart, C., Ndhlovu, T., & Ravesteijn, P. (2015). Social media in the context of development: A case study of Dutch NGOs. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems.
  • Slisli, F. (2012). “The idea that one could come to terms with the Arabs”: How Frantz Fanon found common ground with Islam in Algeria. The Black Scholar, 42(3–4), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2012.11413607
  • Smith, H., Discetti, R., Bellucci, M., & Acuti, D. (2022). SMEs engagement with the sustainable development goals: A power perspective. Journal of Business Research, 149, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.021
  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
  • Spivak, G. C. (2005). Scattered speculations on the subaltern and the popular. Postcolonial Studies, 8(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790500375132
  • Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6
  • Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: Foundations, research, and theoretical elaboration. Oxford University Press.
  • Tiwana, A., & Kim, S. K. (2015). Discriminating IT governance. Information Systems Research, 26(4), 656–674. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0591
  • Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0206
  • Tonelli, A. O., Souza Bermejo, P. H. D., Aparecida dos Santos, P., Zuppo, L., & Zambalde, A. L. (2017). IT governance in the public sector: A conceptual model. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9614-x
  • Toutaoui, J., Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2022). Managing paradoxes in bimodal information technology functions: A multi‐case study. Information Systems Journal, 32(6), 1177–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12396
  • Tsibolane, P., & Brown, I. (2016). Principles for conducting critical research using postcolonial theory in ICT4D studies. In Proceedings annual workshop in the AIS special interest group for ICT in global development.
  • Tumbas, S., Berente, N., & Vom Brocke, J. (2018). Digital Innovation and institutional entrepreneurship: Chief digital officer perspectives of their emerging role. Journal of Information Technology, 33(3), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-018-0055-0
  • Urbach, N., Ahlemann, F., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Brenner, W., Schaudel, F., & Schütte, R. (2019). The impact of digitalization on the IT department. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0570-0
  • Vaia, G., Arkhipova, D., & DeLone, W. (2022). Digital governance mechanisms and principles that enable agile responses in dynamic competitive environments. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(6), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2078743
  • van Grembergen, W. (Ed.). (2004). Strategies for information technology governance. Idea Group Publishing.
  • Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1246406
  • Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258607
  • Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0895
  • Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2010). It governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results (reprint). Harvard Business School Press.
  • Williams, C. K., & Karahanna, E. (2013). Causal explanation in the coordinating process: A critical realist case study of federated IT governance structures. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 933–964. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.12
  • Worden, R., & Saez, P. (2021). Shifting power in humanitarian nonprofits: A review of 15 NGO governing boards. Center for Global Development.
  • Xue, Y., Liang, H., & Boulton, W. R. (2008). Information Technology Governance in Information Technology investment decision process: The impact of investment characteristics, external environment, and internal context. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148829
  • Xue, L., Ray, G., & Gu, B. (2011). Environmental uncertainty and IT infrastructure governance: A curvilinear relationship. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0269
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Young, A., Selander, L., & Vaast, E. (2019). Digital organizing for social impct: Current insights and future research avenues on collective action, social movements, and digital technologies. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100257