Aseptic versus clean technique during wound management? Systematic review with meta-analysis

References

• Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, Treweek S, Mustafa RA, Rada G, Rosenbaum S, et al. 2016. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. i2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alqahtani M, Lalonde DH. 2006. Sterile Versus Nonsterile Clean Dressings. Canadian J Plastic Surgery. 14(1):25–27. doi: 10.1177/229255030601400110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atsma F, Elwyn G, Westert G. 2020. Understanding unwarranted variation in clinical practice: a focus on network effects, reflective medicine and learning health systems. Int J Qual Health Care. 32(4):271–274. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. 2019. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health. 22(4):153–160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG. 2001. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 14(2):244–269. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.244-269.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman B. 1987. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 317(3):141–145. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198707163170304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher R, Dix A. 2020. Sustainability 1: can nurses reduce the environmental impact of healthcare? Nurs Times. 116(9):29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gould DJ, Courtenay M, Gallagher R, Hawker C, Chudleigh J, Purssell E, Drey N. 2022. Challenges undertaking procedures requiring asepsis: a qualitative interview study with nurses. J Hosp Infect. 133:S55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest JF, Fuller GW, Vowden P. 2020. Cohort study evaluating the burden of wounds to the UK’s National Health Service in 2017/2018: update from 2012/2013. BMJ Open. 10(12):e045253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker C, Courtenay M, Wigglesworth N, Gould D. 2020. National cross-sectional survey to explore preparation to undertake aseptic technique in pre-registration nursing curricula in the United Kingdom. Nurse Educ Today. 90:104415. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heal C, Sriharan S, Buttner PG, Kimber D. 2015. Comparing non-sterile to sterile gloves for minor surgery: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Med J Aust. 202(1):27–31. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X, Zhang J, Guan S, Liang W. 2016. Comparison of sterile and clean dressing techniques in post-operative surgical wound infection in a Chinese healthcare facility. Trop J Pharm Res. 15(2):415–419. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v15i2.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal H, Lyne A, Ashley P, Duane B. 2021. Non-sterile examination gloves and sterile surgical gloves: which are more sustainable? J Hosp Infect. 118:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent DJ, Scardillo JN, Dale B, Pike C. 2018. Does the use of clean or sterile dressing technique affect the incidence of wound infection? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 45(3):265–269. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapes NA, Greene VW, Langholz AC. 1987. Microbial contamination associated with routine aseptic practice. J Hosp Infect. 10(3):299–304. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(87)90013-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson C, Juliano L, Ratliff CR. 2003. Does sterile or nonsterile technique make a difference in wounds healing by secondary intention? Ostomy Wound Manage. 49(4):56–58, 60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lister SE, Hofland J, Grafton H. 2020. The Royal Marsden manual of clinical nursing procedures. 10th ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney B, McKerlie T, Nasir M, Murphy C, Moi M, Mudalige P, Naser NE, Duane B. 2022. The environmental footprint of single-use versus reusable cloths for clinical surface decontamination: a life cycle approach. J Hosp Infect. 130:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marie Aziz A. 2009. Variations in aseptic technique and implications for infection control. Br J Nurs. 18(1):26–31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2009.18.1.32073.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merei JM. 2004. Pediatric clean surgical wounds: is dressing necessary? J Pediatr Surg. 39(12):1871–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2012. Healthcare-associated infections: prevention and control in primary and community care Clinical guideline [CG139]. London: NICE.
   Google Scholar
• Ooi K. 2020. The pitfalls of overtreatment: why more care is not necessarily beneficial. Asian Bioeth Rev. 12(4):399–417. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00145-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perelman VS, Francis GJ, Rutledge T, Foote J, Martino F, Dranitsaris G. 2004. Sterile versus nonsterile gloves for repair of uncomplicated lacerations in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 43(3):362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RM. 2005. Aseptic technique: evidence-based approach for patient safety. Br J Nurs. 14(10):540–546. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2005.14.10.18102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik DB. 2004. The precautionary principle and medical decision making. J Med Philos. 29(3):281–299. doi: 10.1080/03605310490500509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizan C, Lillywhite R, Reed M, Bhutta MF. 2022. Minimising carbon and financial costs of steam sterilisation and packaging of reusable surgical instruments. Br J Surg. 109(2):200–210. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A 2013. GRADE handbook [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Jan 19]. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html#h.9rdbelsnu4iy
   Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, et al. 2019. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. l4898. doi:10.1136/bmj.l4898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotts NA, Barbour S, Griggs K, Bouvier B, Buhlman L, Wipke-Tevis D, Williams DF. 1997. Sterile versus clean technique in postoperative wound care of patients with open surgical wounds: a pilot study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 24(1):10–18. doi: 10.1097/00152192-199701000-00005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unsworth J, Collins J. 2011. Performing an aseptic technique in a community setting: fact or fiction? Primary Health Care. 12(1):42–51. doi: 10.1017/S1463423610000198.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Shinder R. 2022. Comparison of postoperative infection rates after office-based oculoplastic procedures using sterile and clean gloves. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Internet. 39(2):146–149. [accessed 2023 Jan 20] Publish Ahead of Print. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society Wound Committee, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology. 2012. Clean vs. sterile dressing techniques for management of chronic wounds: a fact sheet. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 39(2S):S30–S34. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182478e06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia Y, Cho S, Greenway HT, Zelac DE, Kelley B. 2011. Infection rates of wound repairs during mohs micrographic surgery using sterile versus nonsterile gloves: a prospective randomized pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 37(5):651–656. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01949.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaans JJM, Raven W, Rosendaal AV, Lieshout EMMV, Woerden GV, Patka P, Haagsma JA, Rood PPM. 2022. Non-sterile gloves and dressing versus sterile gloves, dressings and drapes for suturing of traumatic wounds in the emergency department: a non-inferiority multicentre randomised controlled trial. Emerg Med J. 39(9):650–654. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar