Health benefits to vulnerable populations by meeting particle-level guidelines inside schools with different ventilation conditions

References

• Adams B 2015. What is a safe distance to live or work near high auto emission roads? San Diego UrbDezine [Internet]. https://sandiego.urbdezine.com/2015/05/28/what-is-a-safe-distance-to-live-or-work-near-high-auto-emission-roads/
   Google Scholar
• Almeida SM, Canha N, Silva A, Do Carmo Freitas M, Pegas P, Alves C, Evtyugina M, Pio CA. 2011. Children exposure to atmospheric particles in indoor of Lisbon primary schools. Atmos Environ. 45(40): 7594–7599. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.11.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore MR, Dimitroulopoulou C. 2009. Personal exposure of children to air pollution. Atmos Environ. 43(1): 128–141. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braniš M, Řezáčová P, Guignon N. 2002. Fine particles (PM1) in four different indoor environments. Indoor And Built Environment. 11(4): 184–190. doi: 10.1177/1420326X0201100402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonanno G, Fuoco FC, Morawska L, Stabile L. 2013. Airborne particle concentrations at schools measured at different spatial scales. Atmos Environ. 67:38–45. doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2012.10.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Zhao B. 2011. Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmos Environ. Internet. [accessed 2019 Aug 14. 45(2): 275–288. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chithra VS, Shiva Nagendra SM. 2012. Indoor air quality investigations in a naturally ventilated school building located close to an urban roadway in Chennai, India. Build Environ. 54:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPCB. 2019. National ambient air quality standards. CPCB [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Nov 7]. https://cpcb.nic.in/uploads/National_Ambient_Air_Quality_Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guo H, Morawska L, He C, Zhang YL, Ayoko G, Cao M. 2010. Characterization of particle number concentrations and PM2.5 in a school: influence of outdoor air pollution on indoor air. Environ Sci Pollut R. 17(6): 1268–1278. doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0306-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habil M, Massey DD, Taneja A. 2013. Exposure of children studying in schools of India to PM levels and metal contamination: sources and their identification. Air Qual Atmos Health. 6(3): 575–587. doi:10.1007/s11869-013-0201-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hänel G, Thudium J. 1977. Mean bulk densities of samples of dry atmospheric aerosol particles: a summary of measured data. Pure And Applied Geophysics PAGEOPH. 115(4): 799–803. doi: 10.1007/BF00881211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverinen-Shaughnessy U, Moschandreas DJ, Shaughnessy RJ. 2011. Association between substandard classroom ventilation rates and students’ academic achievement. Indoor Air. 21(2): 121–131. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00686.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Li N, Zou S, Yoshino H, Yanagi U, Yu CW, Qu H. 2019. Indoor environmental conditions in schoolchildren’s homes in central-south China. Indoor And Built Environment. 29(7): 956–971. Internet. doi:10.1177/1420326X19875185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izhar S, Rajput P, Gupta T. 2018. Variation of particle number and mass concentration and associated mass deposition during Diwali festival. Urban Clim. 24(july):1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Jan R, Roy R, Yadav S, Satsangi PG. 2017. Exposure assessment of children to particulate matter and gaseous species in school environments of Pune, India. Build Environ. 111:207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayakumar S, Apte MG2019Estimation and analysis of ventilation rates in schools in Indian context: iAQ and indoor environmental qualityIOP conf ser mater sci engVol. 609 [place unknown]Institute of Physics Publishing. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/609/3/032046
   Google Scholar
• Kelly FJ, Fussell JC. 2019. Improving indoor air quality, health and performance within environments where people live, travel, learn and work. Atmos Environ. 200:90–109. doi: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2018.11.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B-K, Thi Hieu N. 2011. Seasonal variation and sources of heavy metals in atmospheric aerosols in a residential area of Ulsan, Korea. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 11:679–688. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2010.10.0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Fan G, Ou Y, Deng Q. 2023. Characteristics and control strategies of indoor particles: an updated review. Energy Build. 294:113232. doi: 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2023.113232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CC, Lee MK, Huang HL. 2015. Effects of chalk use on dust exposure and classroom air quality. Aerosol Air Qual Res. Internet. [accessed 2024 Jan 5. 15(7): 2596–2608. doi: 10.4209/AAQR.2015.04.0216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Zhou R, Zhang J. 2018. Function of PM2.5 in the pathogenesis of lung cancer and chronic airway inflammatory diseases (review). Oncol Lett. Internet. [accessed 2023 May 8. 15(5): 7506. doi: 10.3892/OL.2018.8355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew J, Goyal R, Taneja KK, Arora N. 2015. Air pollution and respiratory health of school children in industrial, commercial and residential areas of Delhi. Air Qual Atmos Health. 8(4): 421–427. doi:10.1007/s11869-014-0299-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA Earth Sciences. 2015. Aerosols and their importance | earth. NASA [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Apr 10]. https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/climate/data/deep-blue/aerosols
   Google Scholar
• Olson SL, Kellum S 2003. The impact of sustainable buildings on educational achievements in K-12 schools [Internet]. [accessed 2023 May 16]. www.cleanerandgreener.org.
   Google Scholar
• Padró-Martínez LT, Patton AP, Trull JB, Zamore W, Brugge D, Durant JL. 2012. Mobile monitoring of particle number concentration and other traffic-related air pollutants in a near-highway neighborhood over the course of a year. Atmos Environ. 61:253–264. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton AP, Perkins J, Zamore W, Levy JI, Brugge D, Durant JL. 2014. Spatial and temporal differences in traffic-related air pollution in three urban neighborhoods near an interstate highway. Atmos Environ. 99:309–321. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitz M, Cyrys J, Karg E, Wiedensohler A, Wichmann HE, Heinrich J. 2003. Variability of apparent particle density of an urban aerosol. Environ Sci Technol. 37(19): 4336–4342. doi: 10.1021/es034322p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadrizadeh S, Yao R, Yuan F, Awbi H, Bahnfleth W, Bi Y, Cao G, Croitoru C, de Dear R, Haghighat F, et al. 2022. Indoor air quality and health in schools: a critical review for developing the roadmap for the future school environment. J Build Eng. 57:104908. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.104908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagona JA, Shalat SL, Wang Z, Ramagopal M, Black K, Hernandez M, Mainelis G. 2015. Evaluation of particle resuspension in young children׳s breathing zone using stationary and robotic (PIPER) aerosol samplers. J Aerosol Sci. 85:30–41. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son YS. 2023. A review on indoor and outdoor factors affecting the level of particulate matter in classrooms of elementary schools. J Build Eng. 75:106957. doi: 10.1016/J.JOBE.2023.106957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundell J, Levin H, Nazaroff WW, Cain WS, Fisk WJ, Grimsrud DT, Gyntelberg F, Li Y, Persily AK, Pickering AC, et al. 2011. Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. Indoor Air. 21(3):191–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00703.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu TV, Delgado-Saborit JM, Harrison RM. 2015. Review: particle number size distributions from seven major sources and implications for source apportionment studies. Atmos Environ. 122:114–132. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warheit DB, Sayes CM, Reed KL, Swain KA. 2008. Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 120(1): 35–42. doi: 10.1016/J.PHARMTHERA.2008.07.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2021. What are the WHO Air quality guidelines? WHO [Internet]. [accessed 2023 Mar 7]. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/what-are-the-who-air-quality-guidelines/
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2021. What are the WHO Air quality guidelines? [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Sep 7]. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/what-are-the-who-air-quality-guidelines//
   Google Scholar
• Wróbel A, Rokita E, Maenhaut W. 2000. Transport of traffic-related aerosols in urban areas. Sci Total Environ. 257(2): 199–211. Internet. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00519-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Chu C, Bloom MS, Li S, Chen G, Heinrich J, Markevych I, Knibbs LD, Bowatte G, Dharmage SC, et al. 2018. Is smaller worse? New insights about associations of PM1 and respiratory health in children and adolescents. Environmental International. 120:516–524. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.08.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Z, Ye X, Jiang S, Tao Y, Shi Y, Yang X, Chen J. 2015. Size-resolved effective density of urban aerosols in Shanghai. Atmos Environ. 100:133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Wang H, Huebner G, Zeng Y, Pei Z, Ucci M. 2023. Short-term exposure to indoor PM2.5 in office buildings and cognitive performance in adults: an intervention study. Build Environ. 233:110078. doi: 10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2023.110078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar