241
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Experiences of workers with long-term disabilities on employer support throughout the RTW process in The Netherlands: a qualitative study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 24 Aug 2022, Accepted 12 Apr 2024, Published online: 25 Apr 2024

References

  • Koning P, Lindeboom M. The rise and fall of disability insurance enrollment in The Netherlands. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29(2):151–172. doi:10.1257/jep.29.2.151.
  • Liebman JB. Understanding the increase in disability insurance benefit receipt in the United States. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29(2):123–150. doi:10.1257/jep.29.2.123.
  • Burkhauser RV, Daly MC, Ziebarth NR. Protecting working-age people with disabilities: experiences of four industrialized nations. J Labour Market Res. 2016;49(4):367–386. doi:10.1007/s12651-016-0215-z.
  • Nastasia I, Coutu M-F, Rives R, et al. Role and responsibilities of supervisors in the sustainable return to work of workers following a work-related musculoskeletal disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;31(1):107–118. doi:10.1007/s10926-020-09896-w.
  • Jansen J, van Ooijen R, Koning PWC, et al. The role of the employer in supporting work participation of workers with disabilities: a systematic literature review using an interdisciplinary approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(4):916–949. doi:10.1007/s10926-021-09978-3.
  • Buys NJ, Selander J, Sun J. Employee experience of workplace supervisor contact and support during long-term sickness absence. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(7):808–814. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1410584.
  • McLellan RK, Pransky G, Shaw WS. Disability management training for supervisors: a pilot intervention program. J Occup Rehabil. 2001;11(1):33–41. doi:10.1023/a:1016652124410.
  • Sheehan LR, Lane TJ, Gray SE, et al. Factors associated with employer support for injured workers during a workers’ compensation claim. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):718–727. doi:10.1007/s10926-019-09834-5.
  • Tiedtke CM, Dierckx de Casterle B, Frings-Dresen MHW, et al. Employers’ experience of employees with cancer: trajectories of complex communication. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(5):562–577. doi:10.1007/s11764-017-0626-z.
  • Corbière M, Mazaniello-Chézol M, Lecomte T, et al. Developing a collaborative and sustainable return to work program for employees with common mental disorders: a participatory research with public and private organizations. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(18):5199–5211. doi:10.1080/09638288.2021.1931481.
  • Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–581. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9304-6.
  • Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring the meaning of early contact in return-to-work from workplace actors’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(2):137–145. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.489630.
  • Tjulin Å, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–321. doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9209-9.
  • Aas RW, Ellingsen KL, Lindøe P, et al. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):335–346. doi:10.1007/s10926-008-9147-y.
  • Durand MJ, Nastasia I, Coutu MF, et al. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147. doi:10.1007/s10926-016-9640-7.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
  • Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Saint Paul (MN): Sage Publication; 2014.
  • Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391–409. doi:10.1023/A:1020909529486.
  • Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–116. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114.
  • Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. Encycl crit psychol. Springer New York; 2014. p. 1947–1952.
  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
  • Holmgren KS, Ivanoff D. Supervisors’ views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(1):93–106. ·doi:10.1007/s10926-006-9041-4.
  • Lemieux P, Durand MJ, Hong QN. Supervisors’ perception of the factors influencing the return to work of workers with common mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(3):293–303. doi:10.1007/s10926-011-9316-2.
  • Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, et al. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17. doi:10.1007/s10926-014-9511-z.
  • Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Work-Ready Group., et al. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: a qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2101–2114. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00131-x.
  • Franche R-L, Baril R, Shaw W, et al. Workplace-Based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–542. doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8032-1.
  • Jetha A, LaMontagne AD, Lilley R, et al. Workplace social system and sustained return-to-work: a study of supervisor and Co-worker supportiveness and injury reaction. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(3):486–494. doi:10.1007/s10926-017-9724-z.
  • Joosen MCW, Lugtenberg M, Arends I, et al. Barriers and facilitators for return to work from the perspective of workers with common mental disorders with short, medium and long-term sickness absence: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;32(2):272–283. doi:10.1007/s10926-021-10004-9.
  • Jansen J, Boot CRL, Alma MA, et al. Exploring employer perspectives on their supportive role in accommodating workers with disabilities to promote sustainable RTW: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2022;32(1):1–12. doi:10.1007/s10926-021-10019-2.
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Boot CRL, Bosma AR. How qualitative studies can strengthen occupational health research. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021;47(2):91–93. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3943.
  • Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.
  • McGuire C, Kristman VL, Shaw WS, et al. Supervisors’ perceptions of organizational policies are associated with their likelihood to accommodate back-injured workers. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(4):346–353. doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1141245.
  • Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, et al. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–48. doi:10.1007/s10926-009-9208-x.
  • Woods M, Matthewson ML. Managing and mitigating suffering in the return-to-work process. Front Psychol. 2021;12:805855. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.805855.
  • Jansen J, Snippen N, Koning P, Boot CRL, van Ooijen R, Brouwer, S. Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):525. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15038-7.