595
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Web conferencing-based tutorials: student perceptions thereof and the effect on academic performance in accounting education

, &
Pages 531-546 | Received 10 Apr 2017, Accepted 20 Nov 2017, Published online: 18 Dec 2017

References

  • Alexander, S., McKenzie, J., & Geissinger, H. (1998). An evaluation of information technology projects for university learning (executive summary). Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/cutsd/publications/exsummary.html
  • Barac, K. (2015). Helping disadvantaged students: Findings from the Thuthuka programme. Accounting Education, 24(2), 75–101. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2015.1010171
  • Barron, A., Schullo, S., Kromrey, J., Hogarty, K., Venable, M., Barros, C., Hilbelink, A., Hohlfeld, T., Loggie, K., et al. (2005). Synchronous E-learning: Analysing teaching strategies. In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2005 (pp. 3060–3067). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Bell, S. (2003). Cyber guest lectures: Using webcasts as a teaching tool. TechTrends, 47(4), 10–14. doi: 10.1007/BF02763506
  • Borstorff, P. C., & Lowe, S. K. (2007). Student perceptions and opinions toward e-learning in the college environment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 11(2), 13–29.
  • Branon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education: A survey of instructors. TechTrends, 45(1), 36–42. doi: 10.1007/BF02763377
  • Britt, P. (2006). Seven reasons you need web conferencing. Network computing. Retrieved from http://www.networkcomputing.com/channels/networkinfrastructure/showArticle.jhtml?articleD=191600459
  • Chiu, C. F., Lee, G. C., & Yang, J. H. (2006). A comparative study of post-class lecture viewing. Proceedings of the 5th IASTED international conference on Web-based education, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico (pp. 126–130).
  • Clark, R. L., & Sweeney, R. B. (1985, July). Admission to accounting programs: Using a discriminant model as a classification procedure. The Accounting Review, 508–518.
  • Coetzee, S. A., Schmulian, A., & Kotzé, L. (2014). Communication apprehension of South African accounting students: The effect of culture and language. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(4), 505–525. doi: 10.2308/iace-50850
  • Copley, J. (2007). Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus-based students: Production and evaluation of student use. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 387–399. doi: 10.1080/14703290701602805
  • Dale, C., & Pymm, J. (2009). Podagogy: The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84–96. doi: 10.1177/1469787408100197
  • De Freitas, S., & Neumann, T. (2009). Pedagogic strategies supporting the use of synchronous audiographic conferencing: A review of the literature. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 980–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00887.x
  • De Gara, C., & Boora, R. (2006). Using Elluminate as a simple solution for telehealth initiatives for continuing medical education. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 476–480). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Doran, B. M., Bouillon, M. L., & Smith, C. G. (1991, Spring). Determinants of student performance in accounting principles I and II. Issues in Accounting Education, 74–84.
  • Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning instruction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Duemer, L., Fontenot, D., Gumforty, K., Kallus, M., Larsen, J., & Schafer, S. (2002). The use of online synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1–12.
  • Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education, 13, 409–430. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306800
  • Engelbrecht, M. (2005). Adapting to changing expectations: Postgraduate students’ experience of an e-learning tax program. Computers & Education, 45, 217–229. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.001
  • Eskew, R. K., & Faley, R. H. (1988, January). Some determinants of student performance in the first college-level financial accounting course. The Accounting Review, 137–147.
  • Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & Education, 50(2), 491–498. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.016
  • Fletcher, C. R. (1994). Levels of presentation in mempry for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–607). San Diego: Academic Press Inc.
  • French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). An examination of indicators of engineering students’ success and persistence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 419–425. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00869.x
  • Gao, T., & Lehman, J. D. (2003). The effects of different levels of interaction on the achievement and motivational perceptions of college students in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 367–386.
  • Giannakos, M. N., & Vlamos, P. (2012). Educational webcasts’ acceptance: Empirical examination and the role of experience. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 125–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01279.x
  • Giannakos, M. N., & Vlamos, P. (2013). Using webcasts in education: Evaluation of its effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 432–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01309.x
  • Gist, W. E., Goedde, H., & Ward, B. H. (1996). The influence of mathematical skill and other factors on minority student performance in principles of accounting. Issues in Accounting Education, 11(1) (Spring), 49–60.
  • Grace, E. V., & Black, T. G. (2011). Performance predictors in a graduate accounting program. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 12, 117–138. doi: 10.1108/S1085-4622(2011)0000012008
  • Graunke, S. S., & Woosley, S. A. (2005). An exploration of the factors that affect the academic success of college sophomores. College Student Journal, 39(2), 367–377.
  • Hamburg, I., & Lindecke, C. (2003). Social aspects of e-learning and blending learning methods. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference E-Comm-Line, Bucharest, Romania.
  • Hammond, T., Clayton, B. M., & Arnold, P. J. (2009). South Africa’s transition from apartheid: The role of professional closure in the experiences of black chartered accountants. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 705–721. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.09.002
  • Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121. doi: 10.1017/S0958344006000711
  • Harris, H., & Park, S. (2008). Educational usages of podcasting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 548–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00788.x
  • HBX. (2017). Engage with Global Business Leaders—In Real Time. Retrieved from http://hbx.hbs.edu/learning-platforms/hbx-live
  • Hotcomm. (2003). Synchronous tools and the emerging online learning model. Retrieved from http://hotcomm.com/tec/dlwp.pdf
  • Hunter, J. A. (2007). An exploration of student and faculty interactions within web-based distance nursing education, a major essay for Masters of Science Nursing. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  • Ingram, R. W., & Petersen, R. J. (1987, January). An evaluation of AICPA tests for predicting the performance of accounting majors. The Accounting Review, 215–223.
  • Jansen, J. (2011). We need to talk. Johannesburg, ZA: Bookstorm.
  • Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2007). Scaffholding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with mesaage constraints and message labels. Computers and Education, 48(3), 427–445. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.002
  • Johnson, G. M. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational context: A review of recent research. TechTrends, 50(4), 46–53. doi: 10.1007/s11528-006-0046-9
  • Johnson, I. (2008). Enrolment, persistence and graduation of in-state students at a public research university: Does high school matter? Research in Higher Education, 49, 776–793. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9105-8
  • Johnson, T., Wisniewski, M. A., Kuhlemeyer, G., Isaacs, G., & Krzykowski, J. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72.
  • Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donalan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers and Education, 58(3), 953–963. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.015
  • Keller, C., & Cernerud, L. (2002). Student’s perceptions of E-learning in University Education. Journal of Educational Media, 27(1–2), 55–67.
  • Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Moon, R. C., & Rho, J. J. (2010). E-government skills identification and development: Toward a staged-based user-centric approach for developing countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00346.x
  • Knowlton, D. S. (2005). A taxonomy of learning through asynchronous discussion. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(2), 155–177.
  • Lam, D., Ardington, C., & Leibbrandt, M. (2011). Schooling as a lottery: Racial differences in school advancement in urban South Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 121–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.005
  • Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49, 1066–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
  • Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kuptits, V. W. (2006). Online vs. Blendid Learning: Differences in Instructional Outcomes and Learner Satisfaction. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resources Development (AHRD) International Conference, Columbus, OH.
  • Loch, B., & Reushle, S. (2008, November 30–December 3). The practice of web conferencing: where are we now? In Hello! Where are we now in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of Ascilite conference, Melbourne (pp. 562–571).
  • Loizzo, J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2016). MOOCocracy: The learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1–20. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9444-7
  • Maag, M. (2006). IPod, uPod? An emerging mobile learning tool in nursing education and students’ satisfaction. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from ASCILITE website: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p92.pdf
  • Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 129–138. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1999.152085.x
  • Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
  • Montgomery, S. E. (2010). Online webinars! Interactive learning where our users are: The future of embedded librarianship. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2–3), 306–311. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2010.497467
  • Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., & Schuster, J. (1999). Predicting the retention of university students. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 355–371. doi: 10.1023/A:1018755201899
  • New York University (NYU). (2017). What is web conferencing? Retrieved from https://www.nyu.edu/faculty/teaching-and-learning-resources/strategies-for-teaching-with-tech/instructional-video-and-web-conferencing/web-conferencing.html
  • O’Flaherty, J. A., & Laws, T. A. (2014). Nursing student's evaluation of a virtual classroom experience in support of their learning bioscience. Nurse Education in Practice, 14(6), 654–659. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.07.004
  • O’Reilly, T., & Battelle, J. (2004, October 5). Opening welcome: State of the internet industry. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/web2con/view/e_sess/5854
  • Pan, C. C., & Sullivan, M. (2005). Promoting synchronous interaction in an eLearning environment. The Journal, 33(2), 27–30.
  • Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. International Reading Association, 58(3), 272–280.
  • Pena-Shaff, J., Altman, W., & Stephenson, H. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool of learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409–430.
  • Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffenson, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366. doi: 10.2307/747524
  • Sartorius, K., & Sartorius, B. (2013). The comparative performance of chartered accountancy students in South Africa: The impact of historical legacies. Development Southern Africa, 30(3), 401–416. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2013.817307
  • Shahid, U. A. (2005, August 4–7). E-Learning in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities Bangladesh perspective. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on e-Learning for Knowledge-Based Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as Network Creation. Retrieved from e-Learning Space.org website: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
  • Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2008). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 3(2), 57–67.
  • Skinner, E. (2009). Using community development theory to improve student engagement in online discussion: A case study. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 17(2), 89–100. doi: 10.1080/09687760902951599
  • Southern African Consortium on Monitoring Education Quality (SACMEQ II). (2011). Retrieved from http://www.sacmeq.org/?q=sacmeq-projects/sacmeq-ii/readingmathscores
  • Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009
  • Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interactions through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3), 1–24.
  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135. doi: 10.3102/00346543076001093
  • Tan, V. (2007). Using IT tools in teaching – IVLE, webcast lectures and powerpoint. Cdtlink, 11(3), 1–2.
  • University College London (UCL). (2017). Web conferencing. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/digital-education/web-conferencing
  • Van der Berg, S. (2008). How effective are poor schools? Poverty and educational outcomes in South Africa. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(3), 145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.07.005
  • Van Zanten, R., Somogyi, S., & Curro, G. (2012). Purpose and preference in educational podcasting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 130–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01153.x
  • Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1
  • Wang, S., & Hsu, H. (2008). Use of the webinar tool (elluminate) to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from student-trainers’ perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(3), 175–194.
  • Wang, Q., & Woo, H. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face-to-face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 272–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00621.x
  • Wieling, M. B., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54, 992–998. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002
  • World Bank. (2014). World development indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.