Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: an explorative study

References

• AACSB. (2013). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: Author. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/standards/businessstds_2013_update-3oct_final.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Anson, R., & Goodman, J. A. (2014). A peer assessment system to improve student team experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 89(1), 27–34. doi: 10.1080/08832323.2012.754735
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. F. (2008). Peer assessment in small groups: A comparison of methods. Journal of Management Education, 32(2), 183–209. doi: 10.1177/1052562907310489
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J. A., & McCourt Larres, P. (2007). Cooperative learning: A pedagogy to improve students’ generic skills? Education and Training, 49(2), 126–137. doi: 10.1108/00400910710739487
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, P. A., Erev, I., Kimmel, M., & Oref-Chen, T. (2005). Peer assessment, individual performance, and contribution to group processes the impact of rater anonymity. Group & Organization Management, 30(4), 344–377. doi: 10.1177/1059601104267619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996a). Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1080/0260293960210101
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1996b). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. doi: 10.1007/BF00138871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire, England: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240405
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education learning for the longer term. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L. (1998). Teaching teamwork skills. Lexington, Massachusetts: MIT Teaching and Learning Laboratory. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/fnl/vol/104/breslow.html
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C. M., & Ammons, J. L. (2003). Free riding in group projects and the effects of timing, frequency, and specificity of criteria in peer assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 78(5), 268–272. doi: 10.1080/08832320309598613
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, S. M., & Albring, S. M. (2006). Effective team building: Guidance for accounting educators. Issues in Accounting Education, 21(3), 241–265. doi: 10.2308/iace.2006.21.3.241
   Google Scholar
• Bui, B., & Porter, B. (2010). The expectation-performance gap in accounting education: An exploratory study. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 19(1/2), 23–50. doi: 10.1080/09639280902875556
   Google Scholar
• Bushell, G. (2006). Moderation of peer assessment in group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 91–108. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262395
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, S. (2006). Developing employability skills: Peer assessment in higher education. Education and Training, 48(7), 508–517. doi: 10.1108/00400910610705890
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., Jones, K. T., & Moreland, K. (2010). Virtual groups in a cost accounting course: Group dynamics, outcomes, and participant satisfaction. Advances in Accounting Education, 11, 153–170. doi: 10.1108/S1085-4622(2010)0000011010
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997). Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 233–239. doi: 10.1080/03075079712331381064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243–255. doi: 10.1080/135625100114885
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. M. (2009). Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58(4), 563–584. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. A., Fletcher, M., Cameron, C., & Bodle, K. (2013). Online self and peer assessment of team work in accounting education. Accounting Research Journal, 26(3), 222–238. doi: 10.1108/ARJ-04-2012-0029
   Google Scholar
• Dochy, F. J., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279–298. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6
   Google Scholar
• Dyball, M., Reid, A., Ross, P., & Schoch, H. (2007). Evaluating assessed group-work in a second-year management accounting subject. Accounting Education: an International Journal, 16(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1080/09639280701234385
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, N., & Higgins, A. (2005). Self and peer assessment – does it make a difference to student group work? Nurse Education in Practice, 5(1), 40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2004.03.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer feedback marking: Developing peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training Internationa, 32(2), 175–187. doi: 10.1080/1355800950320212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. (1995). Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(3), 289–300. doi: 10.1080/0260293950200305
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., & Hancock, P. (2011). A brave new world: Australian learning outcomes in accounting education. Accounting Education, 20(3), 265–273. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2011.580915
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M., & McKenzie, J. (2002). Spark, a confidential web–based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 551–569. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gates, A. Q., Delgado, N., & Mondragon, O. (2000). A structured approach for managing a practical software engineering course. Proceedings of the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Kansas City.
   Google Scholar
• Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365–377. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240401
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, D. (2009). Students give group assignments a failing grade. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com
   Google Scholar
• Haberyan, A. (2007). Team-based learning in an industrial/organizational psychology course. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, O. A., Fox, A., & Hannah, G. (2014). Self and peer-assessment: Evidence from the accounting and finance discipline. Accounting Education, 23(3), 225–243. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2014.905259
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. H., Lethbridge, T. C., & Port, D. (2003). Evaluating individual contribution toward group software engineering projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and CPA Australia. (2012). Professional accreditation guidelines for higher education programs. Retrieved from https://www.charteredaccountants.com.au/~/media/Files/Students/Educators/Professional%20Accreditation%20Guidelines%20for%20Australian%20Accounting%20Degrees.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Jackling, B., & De Lange, P. (2009). Do accounting graduates’ skills meet the expectations of employers? A matter of convergence or divergence. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 18(4/5), 369–385. doi: 10.1080/09639280902719341
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. J. (2005). Peer assessment in group projects: Is it worth it?Paper presented at the Australian Computing Education Conference, Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. (2005). The changing student experience: Who’s driving it and where is it going?Proceedings of the Student Experience Conference, Good Practice iUniversity, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., & Farrow, S. (1996). A survey of methods of deriving individual grades from group assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 267–280. doi: 10.1080/0260293960210306
   Google Scholar
• Loddington, S. (2008). Peer assessment of group work: A review of the literature WebPA project. London: Faculty of Engineering, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Loughry, M. L., Moore, D. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2007). Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 505–524. doi: 10.1177/0013164406292085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahenthiran, S., & Rouse, P. (2000). The impact of group selection on student performance and satisfaction. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14(6), 255–265. doi: 10.1108/09513540010348043
   Google Scholar
• Maiden, S. (2004, 10 June). Graduates ‘failing the uni of life’. The Australian.
   Google Scholar
• Melles, G. (2004). Understanding the role of language/culture in group work through qualitative interviewing. The Qualitative Report, 9(2), 216–240.
   Google Scholar
• Miglietti, C. (2002). Using cooperative small groups in introductory accounting classes: A practical approach. Journal of Education for Business, 78(2), 111–115. doi: 10.1080/08832320209599707
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., & Layton, R. A. (2000). Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. ASEE annual conference. ASEE, St. Louis.
   Google Scholar
• Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., … Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 609–630. doi: 10.5465/amle.2010.0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2012). Improving student satisfaction in a first-year undergraduate accounting course by team learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 53–82. doi: 10.2308/iace-10217
   Google Scholar
• Opdecam, E., Everaert, P., Van Keer, H., & Buysschaert, F. (2014). Preferences for team learning and lecture-based learning among first-year undergraduate accounting students. Research in Higher Education, 55(4), 400–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(4), 195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1990). Introduction by Seymour Papert. In I. Harel (Ed.), Constructionist learning (pp. 13–28). Boston: MIT Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Pond, K., Coates, D., & Palermo, O. A. (2007). Student perceptions of peer review marking of team projects. Retrieved from http://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/2134/3040/1/IJMEPaper%20190%20%23%20final2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, J. S., Bizo, L. A., & Stratford, R. J. (2006). The educational impact of team-skills training: Preparing students to work in groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 119–140. doi: 10.1348/000709904X24564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sobral, D. T. (1997). Improving learning skills: A self-help group approach. Higher Education &Training, 33(1), 39–50. doi: 10.1023/A:1002997022123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, R. W., & Bailey, J. J. (2007). Team conflict self-efficacy and outcome expectancy of business students. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5), 258–266. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.82.5.258-266
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, I. B., & Wilcox, S. (1996). Peer and self-assessment of group work: Developing an effective response to increased enrolment in a third-year course in microclimatology. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 20(3), 343–353. doi: 10.1080/03098269608709377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J. T., & Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 61–67. doi: 10.1177/027347539001200208
   Google Scholar
• Tempone, I., Kavanagh, M., Segal, N., Hancock, P., Howieson, B., & Kent, J. (2012). Desirable generic attributes for accounting graduates into the twenty-first century: The views of employers. Accounting Research Journal, 25(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1108/10309611211244519
   Google Scholar
• Treleaven, L., & Voola, R. (2008). Integrating the development of graduate attributes through constructive alignment. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(2), 160–173. doi: 10.1177/0273475308319352
   Google Scholar
• Vass, E. (2002). Friendship and collaborative creative writing in the primary classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(1), 102–110. doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00216.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. (2007). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in the context of work-based learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(1), 79–87. doi: 10.1080/02602930600848309
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Imbrie, P. K. (2010). Students’ peer evaluation calibration through the administration of vignettes. Paper presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, R. (2004). Group work and assessment: The handbook for economics lecturers. Economics Network. Retrieved from http://www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/handbook/printable/groupwork.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wells, P., Gerbic, P., Kranenburg, I., & Bygrave, J. (2009). Professional skills and capabilities of accounting graduates: The New Zealand expectation gap? Accounting Education, 18(4/5), 403–420. doi: 10.1080/09639280902719390
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2009 , July). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment to engage students and increase their desire to learn. SEFI 37th Annual Conference, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Young, C. B., & Henquinet, J. A. (2000). Viewpoint: A conceptual framework for designing group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 76(1), 56–60. doi: 10.1080/08832320009599051
   Google Scholar