PhD students’ relatedness, motivation, and well-being with multiple supervisors

References

• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, R. P., & Lyons, P. (2012). Instructor care and consideration toward students—What accounting students report: A research note. Accounting Education, 21(5), 515–527. doi:10.1080/09639284.2011.602511
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. J., Williams, E. A., & Stassen, M. L. A. (2012). Dissecting doctoral advising: A comparison of students’ experiences across disciplines. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 36(3), 309–331. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2011.614933
   Google Scholar
• Barry, K. M., Woods, M., Warnecke, E., Stirling, C., & Martin, A. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468–483. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastalich, W. (2017). Content and context in knowledge production: A critical review of PhD supervision literature. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1145–1157. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehe, D. M. (2016). Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 399–414. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2019). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 19(2), 424–445. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R. L., & Heiland, D. (2007). Accountability, assessment and PhD education: Recommendations for moving forward. European Journal of Education, 42(3), 351–362. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00311.x
   Google Scholar
• Cable, D. M., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. (2013). Breaking them in or eliciting their best? Reframing socialization around newcomers’ authentic self-expression. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 1–36. doi:10.1177/0001839213477098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, A., & Greene, K. (2016). Social penetration theory. In C. Berger & M. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1–4). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic160.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. (2016). Postgraduate research experience 2015: A report on the perceptions of recent higher degree research graduates. Graduate Careers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, J. (2019). External relational attributions: Attributing cause to others’ relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 541–553. doi:10.1002/job.2360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., Taylor, J., Williams, J., & Tong, K. (2016). Student satisfaction and perceptions of quality: Testing the linkages for PhD students. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(6), 1153–1166. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1160873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Roberts, S. K. (2008). Chinese students in US accounting and business PhD programs: Educational, political and social considerations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(2), 199–216. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2006.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Cozby, P. C. (1972). Self-disclosure, reciprocity and liking. Sociometry, 35(1), 151–160. doi:10.2307/2786555
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dai, N. T., Free, C., & Gendron, Y. (2019). Interview-based research in accounting 2000–2014: Informal norms, translation and vibrancy. Management Accounting Research, 42, 26–38. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2018.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Skills and Employment. (2019). Table 2.3: All students by level of course and broad field of education, full year 2018, Retrieved file:///D:/Downloads/2018_section_2_-_all_students%20(2).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2021). Australia Awards Scholarships policy handbook. https://www.dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/australia-awards-scholarships-policy-handbook
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1246–1264. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., Bexley, E., & Richardson, S. (2011). Regenerating the academic workforce: The careers, intentions and motivations of higher degree research students in Australia: Findings of the National Research Student Survey. Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Rio, J., Cecchini, J. A., Mendez-Gimenez, A., & Carriedo, A. (2021). Mental well-being profiles and physical activity in times of social isolation by the COVID-19: A latent class analysis. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(2), 1–15. doi:10.1080/1612197X.2021.1877328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K. A. (2018). The manufacture of the academic accountant. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 57, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Tribble, L. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (2019). The missing link? Implications of internal, external, and relational attribution combinations for leader-member exchange, relationship work, self-work, and conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 554–569. doi:10.1002/job.2349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, P., & Burnard, P. (2008). The student–supervisor relationship in the PhD/doctoral process. British Journal of Nursing, 17(10), 668–671. doi:10.12968/bjon.2008.17.10.29484
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goemaere, S., Van Caelenberg, T., Beyers, W., Binsted, K., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2019). Life on Mars from a self-determination theory perspective: How astronauts’ needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness go hand in hand with crew health and mission success-results from HI-SEAS IV. Acta Astronautica, 159, 273–285. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti, & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–427). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606632.023
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92. doi:10.1080/03075070902906798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J., & Carson, S. (2015). Supervising practice: Perspectives on the supervision of creative practice higher degrees by research. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 47(12), 1243–1249. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1094904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., & Grant, C. (2015). Exploring of new models of research pedagogy: Time to let go of master–apprentice style supervision? Teaching in Higher Education, 20(5), 556–566. doi:10.1080/13562517.2015.1036732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemer, S. R. (2012). Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research & Development, 3(6), 827–839. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.674011
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, A. J., & Maxwell, B. (2017). Supporting and inhibiting the well-being of early career secondary school teachers: Extending self-determination theory. British Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 168–191. doi:10.1002/berj.3261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmans, J., Dóci, E., Solinger, O. N., Choi, W., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Capturing the dynamics of leader–follower interactions: Stalemates and future theoretical progress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 4(3), 382–385. doi:10.1002/job.2317
   Google Scholar
• Howells, K., Stafford, K., Guijt, R., & Breadmore, M. (2017). The role of gratitude in enhancing the relationship between doctoral research students and their supervisors. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(6), 621–638. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M. (2017). Improving doctoral support through group supervision: Analysing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 533–550. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Bazarova, N. N., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). The disclosure‒intimacy link in computer-mediated communication: An attributional extension of the hyperpersonal model. Human Communication Research, 37(1), 58–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., & Yerrabati, S. (2017). A review of the literature on professional doctorate supervisory styles. Management in Education, 31(4), 166–171. doi:10.1177/0892020617734821
   Google Scholar
• Joinson, A. N., & Paine, C. B. (2007). Self-disclosure, privacy and the internet. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, & T. Postmes (Eds.), Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 237–252). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 219–266). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khosa, A., Burch, S., Ozdil, E., & Wilkin, C. (2020). Current issues in PhD supervision of accounting and finance students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. British Accounting Review, 52(5), 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2017). Reflections on change in doctoral education: An Australian case study. Studies in Graduate & Postdoctoral Education, 8(2), 78–87. doi:10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 267–281. doi:10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, X., Kaplan, S. A., Dye, C. E., & Wong, C. M. (2019). On the subjective experience and correlates of downtime at work: A mixed-method examination. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(3), 360–381. doi:10.1002/job.2336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2008). Small groups: Key readings. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors watching supervisors: The deconstructive possibilities and tensions of team supervision. Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 29–37. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316informit.424318263696740
   Google Scholar
• Martela, F., Hankonen, N., Ryan, R. M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2021). Motivating voluntary compliance to behavioural restrictions: Self-determination theory–based checklist of principles for COVID-19 and other emergency communications. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 305–347. doi:10.1080/10463283.2020.1857082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.590979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGagh, J., Marsh, H., Western, M., Thomas, P., Hastings, A., Mihailova, M., & Wenham, M. (2016). Review of Australia’s research training system. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Montani, F., Maoret, M., & Dufour, L. (2019). The dark side of socialization: How and when divestiture socialization undermines newcomer outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(4), 506–521. doi:10.1002/job.2351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntoumanis, N., Ng, J. Y., Prestwich, A., Quested, E., Hancox, J. E., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Lonsdale, C., & Williams, G. C. (2021). A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: Effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychology Review, 15(2), 214–244. doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1718529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omarzu, J. (2000). A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 174–185. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Meanings for closeness and intimacy in friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(1), 85–107. doi:10.1177/0265407596131005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, M. (2012). Building bridges: Higher degree student retention and counselling support. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 34(2), 187–199. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2012.662743
   Google Scholar
• Revelo, R. A., & Loui, M. C. (2016). A developmental model of research mentoring. College Teaching, 64(3), 119–129. doi:10.1080/87567555.2015.1125839
   Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019). The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(7), 1243–1260. doi:10.1037/edu0000322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2017). Aspects of mentorship in team supervision of doctoral students in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 44(4), 409–424. doi:10.1007/s13384-017-0241-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, F., Monteiro, D., Teixeira, D. S., & Cid, L. (2020). The relationship between teachers and peers’ motivational climates, needs satisfaction, and physical education grades: An AGT and SDT approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6145. doi:10.3390/ijerph17176145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/110003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & La Guardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (pp. 795–849). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2019). Toward a social psychology of authenticity: Exploring within-person variation in autonomy, congruence, and genuineness using self-determination theory. Review of General Psychology, 23(1), 99–112. doi:10.1037/gpr0000162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Huang, J., & Li, D. (2016). The research of motivation for word-of-mouth: Based on the self-determination theory. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 10(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, M., Thomas, P., & Chui, W. H. (2010). International students: A vulnerable student population. Higher Education, 60(1), 33–46. doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9284-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J., & Urquhart, V. (2018). UK PhD assessment in accounting and finance: Social capital in action. Accounting Education, 27(2), 160–182. doi:10.1080/09639284.2018.1431553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano, C. H., & Dunnam, M. (1985). Two’s company: Self-disclosure and reciprocity in triads versus dyads. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48(2), 183–187. doi:10.2307/3033613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, J. B., & Park, S. S. (2014). Academic experiences of international PhD students in Australian higher education: From an EAP program to a PhD program. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 9(1), 26–37. doi:10.1080/18334105.2014.11082017
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, C., Dimmock, J. A., Lonsdale, C., & Jackson, B. (2016). Modeling indicators and outcomes of students’ perceived teacher relatedness support in high school physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 26, 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, N., & Roberts, R. (2020). Does workload and institutional pressure on accounting educators affect academia at Australian universities? Accounting & Finance, 60(1), 471–506. doi:10.1111/acfi.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, D., & Bergin, R. (2006). Methodology or ‘methodolatry’? An evaluation of focus groups and depth interviews. Qualitative Market Research, 9(1), 26–37. doi:10.1108/13522750610640530
   Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., & Kumar, V. (2010). Feedback and self-regulated learning: Insights from supervisors’ and PhD examiners’ reports. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/14623940903525140
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff, & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Sage annual reviews of communication research: Vol. 14. Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 257–277). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, P. J., Marques, M. M., Silva, M. N., Brunet, J., Duda, J. L., Haerens, L., La Guardia, J., Lindwall, M., Lonsdale, C., Markland, D., Michie, S., Moller, A. C., Ntoumanis, N., Patrick, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., Sebire, S. J., Standage, M., Vansteenkiste, M., … Hagger, M. S. (2020). A classification of motivation and behavior change techniques used in self-determination theory-based interventions in health contexts. Motivation Science, 6(4), 438–455. doi:10.1037/mot0000172
   Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. (2015). Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015. Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Town, J. P., & Harvey, J. H. (1981). Self-disclosure, attribution, and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(4), 291–300. doi:10.2307/3033898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2013). The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1102–1112. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. H., Chang, Y. S., Chang, H. T., & Lin, Y. W. (2021). Running on a social exercise platform: Applying self-determination theory to increase motivation to participate in a sporting event. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106523. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2018). UK Quality Code for Higher Education UK Standing Committee for Quality Assessment. www.qaa.ac.uk/quality-code
   Google Scholar
• Unda, L. A., Khosa, A., Burch, S., & Wilkin, C. (2020). Sustainability of the accounting and finance academic profession: Students' and supervisors' views about the PhD supervision process.. Accounting & Finance, 60(3), 3103–3132. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: Not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2008). Understanding international postgraduate research students’ challenges and pedagogical needs in thesis writing. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 4(3), 88–96. doi:10.5172/ijpl.4.3.88
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A. M., Brennan, N. M., & Wylie, J. (2021). Enrolment motivation of accounting doctoral students: Professionally qualified and non-professionally qualified accountants. Accounting Forum, 1–24. doi:10.1080/01559982.2021.2001127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. L., Bennie, A., Vasconcellos, D., Cinelli, R., Hilland, T., Owen, K. B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103247. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, C. L., Khosa, A., & Burch, S. (2022). Identity in doctoral supervision: perspectives on agency and structure. Journal of Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2089513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. (2015). International students’ motivation to pursue and complete a PhD in the US. Higher Education, 69(5), 719–733. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9802-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar