Students’ preferences for teaching and exam delivery modes in accounting education post-COVID-19 pandemic

References

• Ahmadi, M., Dileepan, P., & Wheatley, K. (2019). Teaching quantitative courses online: Are learning tools offered by publishers effective?. The Journal of Educators Online, 16(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2019.16.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Aldahray, A. (2024). Do accounting students always perform better online? The COVID-19 experience. Accounting Education, 33(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2147799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldamen, H., Al-Esmail, R., & Hollindale, J. (2015). Does lecture capturing impact student performance and attendance in an introductory accounting course? Accounting Education, 24(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2015.1043563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mahameed, M., Riaz, U., & Gee, L. (2022). From unrequited love to sleeping with the enemy: COVID-19 and the future relationship between U.K. universities and professional accounting bodies. Accounting Research Journal, 35(3), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2021-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almossa, S. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., & Hwang, A. (2015). What are the 100 most cited articles in business and management education research, and what do they tell us? Organization Management Journal, 12(3), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15416518.2015.1073135
   Google Scholar
• Azzali, S., Mazza, T., & Tibiletti, V. (2023). Student engagement and performance: Evidence from the first wave of COVID-19 in Italy. Accounting Education, 32(4), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2081813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baber, H. (2022). Social interaction and effectiveness of the online learning–A moderating role of maintaining social distance during the pandemic COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(1), 159–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylis, R. M., & Beynon, M. J. (2024). Investigating the ‘when viewed’ engagement with lecture capture material of accounting students. Accounting Education, 33(2), 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatson, N., De Lange, P., O’Connell, B., Tharapos, M., & Smith, J. K. (2021). Factors impacting on accounting academics’ motivation and capacity to adapt in challenging times. Accounting Research Journal, 34(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-08-2020-0240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, D., Knight, E., & Rowley, J. (2020). The role of hybrid learning spaces in enhancing higher education students’ employability. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1188–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braune, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, C., Davies, C. L., Crookes, P., McGhee, S., & Roxburgh, M. (2020). COVID 19: Disruptive impacts and transformative opportunities in undergraduate nurse education. Nurse Education in Practice, 46, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr-Chellman, A., & Duchastel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, E., & Fleming, M. (2003). A comparison of In-class and online quizzes on student exam performance. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940941
   Google Scholar
• Doran, M. (2021). We need to talk about post-pandemic lecture. Nature Career Column. Retrieved July 1, 2023, from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02112-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., Godfrey, J. M., & Gyles, N. (2003). Do hybrid flexible delivery teaching methods improve accounting students’ learning outcomes? Accounting Education, 12(4), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928032000154512
   Google Scholar
• Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out? Retrieved June 16, 2022, from https://workforce.com/news/why-online-learners-drop-out.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, B. (2015). Online learning revealing the benefits and challenges. Retrieved June 18, 2022, from https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1304&context=education_ETD_masters.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Jaurena, I., & Domínguez, D. (2022). Adaptation of the final exam in a distance education course: From face-to-face to online assessment. Envisioning Report, 2020, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, B. (2021). Expanding interaction in online courses: Integrating critical humanizing pedagogy for learner success. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09888-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2016). Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6923–6947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P., Birt, J., De Lange, P., Fowler, C., Kavanagh, M., Mitrione, L., Rankin, M., Slaughter, G., & Williams, A. (2023). Integrity of assessments in challenging times. Accounting Education, 32(5), 501–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsch, C., Müller-Karabil, A., & Buchminskaia, E. (2021). Addressing the challenges of interaction in online language courses. System, 103, 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., Creely, E., & Henderson, M. (2020). Folk pedagogies for teacher transitions: Approaches to synchronous online learning in the wake of COVID-19. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 201–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, S. I., Nistor, N., & Scheibenzuber, C. (2021). Online teaching and learning in higher education: Lessons learned in crisis situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzweiss, P. C., Joyner, S. A., Fuller, M. B., Henderson, S., & Young, B. (2014). Online graduate students’ perceptions of best learning experiences. Distance Education, 35(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Government. (2022). Timeline of U.K. government coronavirus lockdowns and restrictions. Accessed June 15, 2022, from https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.U.K./charts/U.K.-government-coronavirus-lockdowns.
   Google Scholar
• Jaradat, S., & Ajlouni, A. (2021). Undergraduates’ perspectives and challenges of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case from the University of Jordan. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. D., Hornik, S., & Salas, E. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(5), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Jones, A., Packham, G., Thomas, B., & Miller, C. (2007). It’s all in the mix: The evolution of a blended e-learning model for an undergraduate degree. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 9(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260710839210
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.09.005
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, D. J. (2021). Structural relationship of key factors for student satisfaction and achievement in asynchronous online learning. Sustainability, 13(12), 6734. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1999). Learning style inventory, version 3. Trg Hay/Mcber Training Resources Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lockman, A. S., & Schirmer, B. R. (2020). Online instruction in higher education: Promising, researchbased, and evidence-based practices. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.130.152
   Google Scholar
• Lux, G., Callimaci, A., Caron, M., Fortin, A., & Smaili, N. (2023). COVID-19 and emergency online and distance accounting courses: A student perspective of engagement and satisfaction. Accounting Education, 32(2), 115–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2039729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, G. (2021). Factors affecting students’ intentions to undertake online learning: An empirical study in Vietnam. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6629–6649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10465-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malan, M. (2020). Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: An action research study. Accounting Education, 29(4), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1787855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, J., & Henneberry, S. (2012). What characteristics of college students influence their decisions to select online courses? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(5), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, D. E. (2002). Factors influencing participation and perseverance in online distance learning courses: A case study in continuing professional education. The Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., Kusaila, M., & Grasso, L. (2019). Intermediate accounting and auditing: Does course delivery mode impact student performance? Journal of Accounting Education, 46, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2018.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motteram, G., & Forrester, G. (2005). Becoming an online distance learner: What can be learned from students’ experiences of induction to distance programmes? Distance Education, 26(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500291330
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Vocational Education Research, Leabrook (Australia). (2002). Flexibility through online learning at a glance. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.
   Google Scholar
• Niglas, K. (2004). The combined use of qualitative and quantitative methods in educational research. Tallinna Pedagoogikaülikooli Akadeemiline Raamatukogu.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimwe, G., Kamali, S., Gatesi, E., & Wong, R. (2022). Assessing the perceptions and preferences between online and in-person classroom learning among university students in Rwanda. Journal of Service Science and Management, 15(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2022.151003
   Google Scholar
• Norton, L. S. (2019). Action research in teaching and learning – A practical guide to conducting pedological research in universities (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education in the post COVID-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences, 11(10), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., & Aleksieva, L. K. (2021). The effect of the teachers’ experience in online education during the pandemic on their views of strengths and weaknesses of e-learning (SU case). In CompSysTech '21: International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (pp. 1–11). Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120983481
   Google Scholar
• Rahnert, K. (2022). The teaching hand in remote accounting education: Bringing mirror neurons into the debate. Accounting Education, 31(5), 482–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2020). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623–2656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp-McCall, L. A., & Anyikwa, V. (2016). Active learning strategies and instructor presence in an online research methods course: Can we decrease anxiety and enhance knowledge? Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18060/20871
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (2001). Is online learning right for you? American Agent and Broker, 73(6), 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sangster, A., Stoner, G., & Flood, B. (2020). Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), 431–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: The group comparison between male and female. Quality & Quantity, 55(3), 805–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sher, A. (2009). Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(2).
   Google Scholar
• Soffer, T., Kahan, T., & Nachmias, R. (2019). Patterns of students’ utilization of flexibility in online academic courses and their relation to course achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3), https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.3949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & Maher, G. (2000). Building knowledge building communities: Consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.2190/W4G6-HY52-57P1-PPNE
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wandler, J., & Imbriale, W. (2017). Promoting undergraduate student self-regulation in online learning environments. Online Learning Journal, 21(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Werhner, M. J. (2010). A comparison of the performance of online versus traditional on-campus earth science students on identical exams. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(5), 310–312. https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559697
   Google Scholar
• White, C. (2004). Independent language learning in distance education: Current issues. In Proceedings of the independent learning conference 2003 (pp. 1–9).
   Google Scholar
• Woldeab, D., Yawson, R. M., & Osafo, E. (2020). A systematic meta-analytic review of thinking beyond the comparison of online versus traditional learning. E-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 14(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and in-between: Comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9707-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeşilyurt, F. (2021). The learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and university students’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Zarzycka, E., Krasodomska, J., Mazurczak-Mąka, A., & Turek-Radwan, M. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ communication and collaboration and the role of social media. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1953228. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1953228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar